What did Jesus do? In a similar situation, frequently, the authorities made decisions which went against God—as Jesus saw things—and since God is Jesus, surely His opinion is the important one? Here the Scribes and Pharisees are addressed directly in response to some nit-picking they had going on, even as they arrogated privilege to themselves at the expense even of parents over whom they ruled. Did Jesus let this maladministration slide? No. He did not.
Mark 7:1,9-13 Then came together unto him the Pharisees, and certain of the scribes, which came from Jerusalem . . . And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
They'd cooked up a system employing Vatican-style methods to get their mitts on the stuff whether they were morally entitled to it or not (and of course they weren't) the acid test being: who suffered as a result? But Jesus knew that decisions have consequences and where are the Pharisees today?
The parallel is exact. Seeking a stable business opportunity enabling the means to care for a parent in later life: the authorities had a different idea. Nit-picking over details would free the daughter from any obligation she'd taken on board to provide in the future, bureaucracy opined, and sure enough the Pharisees have a new recruit among their ranks, beyond the pale with goblins.