Yes, when I studied The Bible it soon became apparent that different "translations" existed. First one I noticed was "The Revised Version" which was easy enough to compare with KJV. Mostly it agreed but sometimes it DID NOT AGREE. "How could this be?" I wondered in my innocence. Next up was "The New English Bible" generating many questions no-one seemed able to answer.
Well, they could to their own satisfaction (in fact I doubt this) but not to mine. It's no new phenomenon. Romish catholicism has an agenda to push, initially furthered by prohibiting anyone from reading The Bible at all or at least not until they'd learned Latin, nowadays with collaborations between even more blatant heretics, Lutherans, Abyssinians, The Church of The East, Copts, Orthodox varieties (I stopped counting these a while ago) many of which publications are still available and should be avoided:
Luther's Bible | contains "apocrypha" |
---|
Matthew Bible | '' |
---|
Revised version |
Revised Standard Version | couldn't get it right the first time? |
---|
Living Letters | where you just make up what you wish it said |
---|
God Is For Real, Man | horrific |
---|
New American Standard Bible | one of many |
---|
New International Version |
New King James version |
New Revised Standard Version | how many revisions does it take? |
---|
English Standard Version |
Holman Christian Standard | is this the standard standard, or the standard standard standard? |
---|
New English Translation | "alternative sources" |
---|
Modern English Version | |
---|
Christian Standard Bible | so that's the standard standard standard standard standard standard
standard standard standard standard standard standard standard standard standard version |
---|