[Shadoe_Hare]

Not everyone in Kentucky has guns. And if someone here shoots at you or does something illegal, they usually don't get arrested because they're often related to the cop that comes out.


Yes, Stephen King lives in Bangor, Maine.


That'd be nice to just be free, but life isn't. I write to make extra money to afford things like food, clothing, bills, etc.


That and I enjoy writing anyway, so I'd continue to write no matter how much money I had.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

Actually, it's a book containing three stories that take place in different times [. . .] There's not any bestiality or erotica going on, but each story [. . .] I'm sure at least one person here will think it's pornographic-lol!

Oh, so you wrote a collection of stories.

When you mentioned having written something called "Timeless Tails", I assumed that you were using the unfortunately crass expression "tail" as a euphemism for sex. And as many animals do indeed, have tails and a common synonym for the word "story" is the word "tale", whereas you have used the homonym "tail", then yes, bestiality does come to mind.


Perhaps, as someone who has aspirations of becoming a professional writer, you might wish to learn the appropriate spellings and meanings of any number of one syllable words.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

They (True Christians™) do it with Biblical justification (verses on request) so okay.

You (not True Christian™) do it so porn.

Easy, huh?

I do what?

[Roland]

Hi handmaiden,

I love your innocence. The ´tails´ might be on purpose. Perhaps this person is a Furry?

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

I do what?

Really? The bit from your post that I quoted: "spanking kids and their wives", do you see that?

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Oh, so you wrote a collection of stories.

When you mentioned having written something called "Timeless Tails", I assumed that you were using the unfortunately crass expression "tail" as a euphemism for sex. And as many animals do indeed, have tails and a common synonym for the word "story" is the word "tale", whereas you have used the homonym "tail", then yes, bestiality does come to mind.


Perhaps, as someone who has aspirations of becoming a professional writer, you might wish to learn the appropriate spellings and meanings of any number of one syllable words.

The word 'tail' is a play on words since the book has spanking in it.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

The word 'tail' is a play on words since the book has spanking in it.

Don't give up the day job, just yet.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by Roland

Hi handmaiden,

I love your innocence. The ´tails´ might be on purpose. Perhaps this person is a Furry?

Yes, the 'tails' was on purpose. And yes, I'm a Furry.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

Yes, the 'tails' was on purpose. And yes, I'm a Furry.

Okay. Now we get to the flea-bitten heart of the matter.

Please note that there is a discussion thread on the subject of Furries here at , . That is where you need to go now and start reading.


Honestly, you could have saved us all a lot of time and trouble if you had just declared your perversion in your actual introduction post. That's kind of what it's for.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

Honestly, you could have saved us all a lot of time and trouble if you had just declared your perversion in your actual introduction post. That's kind of what it's for.

There's nothing perverted about being a Furry-lol!

I saw no need to need to mention it until someone wondered about it.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

There's nothing perverted about being a Furry...

Going by the second definition here. Now, your average Kentuckian may be a furry as you are claiming, but community standards at Landover (Bible based ofc., again verses on request, furry thread has 'em) may be slightly different.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

There's nothing perverted about being a Furry-lol!

If that's so, point out a single thing not perverted in this photograph.

[The Attention Seeker Jen (On Moderation)]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

If that's so, point out a single thing not perverted in this photograph.

The weeping willows behind the furries. Anything that's God's original creation can't be perverted.

[Elmer G. White]

Originally Posted by The Attention Seeker Jen

The weeping willows behind the furries. Anything that's God's original creation can't be perverted.

Dear Glutton,

I know that you are uneducated and mostly beyond Salvationary™ hope that this assertion or yours needs to be rectified. In fact, God's original Creation has been perverted countless times because of the Fall from Grace by the first woman who displayed gluttony for fruit (Genesis 3:6). Everything God Created used to be good (Genesis 1:10; Genesis 1:12; Genesis 1:18, Genesis 1:25) and everything that God Created has been soiled by perversions, such as sodomy, emancipation, and gluttony (Romans 8:22). Even the perfect Document that God wrote can be twisted for perverted uses.

Jeremiah 23:36
And the burden of the LORD shall ye mention no more: for every man's word shall be his burden; for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God.

It is not enough to just try to mirror some utterances of Real Actual True Christians™ thus trying to gain the acceptance of this Community of Christ. Actual study and actual research beyond your favorite cooking shows is necessary. For many (if there was reincarnation which there isn't) it would take several lifetimes or incarnations to get there and still - to our chagrin - most would still fail. Being uneducated is not necessarily the fault of a sinner - not making an effort once a sinner realizes its/his/her/their/whatever's ignorance is.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Roland]

Originally Posted by The Attention Seeker Jen

The weeping willows behind the furries. Anything that's God's original creation can't be perverted.

Thank you for pointing that Willow out. I disagree with you however. That Willow has become weeping due to human interference. I assume True Christians™ would believe that Willow to be an abomination.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

There's nothing perverted about being a Furry-lol!

I saw no need to need to mention it until someone wondered about it.

Yes, there was EVERY reason to mention it. I would call something like that a defining characteristic.

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

Going by the second definition here. Now, your average Kentuckian may be a furry as you are claiming, but community standards at Landover (Bible based ofc., again verses on request, furry thread has 'em) may be slightly different.

I can't believe that a horrible, disgusting (but grammatically precise*) atheist had to be the one pointing out the obvious, but I guess The Lord can use almost anything or anyone to His purpose.

Originally Posted by The Attention Seeker Jen

Anything that's God's original creation can't be perverted.

Once more: Read. The. Bible.

The perversion of God's original creation is the major theme of the third chapter of Genesis. Everything that happens past that point is God's clean up operation to deal with what happened to His original creation. The whole Jesus-being-born-without-sin-and-dying-then-coming-back-to-life thing had to happen because of that first definition of perversion that Didymus Much posted.

Perhaps, instead of saying things in your posts that are wildly inaccurate in a desperate attempt to ingratiate yourself to us**, you could read the Bible and/or our discussions about it and decide if you are really capable of toeing the line. ***


__________________________________________________ ________________________________
* Mr. Much does have a few redeeming qualities. (Not the kind of redemption that he needs, but he has established his usefulness here, at least.)


** Should that be "ingratiate to" or "ingratiate with"? Come on, Mr. Much, help me out here, you do need to earn your keep, after all.


*** Ha! THAT one I know is right! Learned it years ago, in between learning my Bible verses and how to grow herbs.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Shadoe_Hare

Furry

Hi. I was glad you chose Philippians —

4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.

Earlier, in chapter 3, Paul reminded the Philippians how important faith in Christ was. He wrote,

3:8-9 I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, and be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith.

Clearly by following mere legalistic requirements, trying to obligate God to overlook the sin nature as Paul was doing, nothing worthwhile can be achieved. What's required is to accept the price Jesus paid to set us free. That doesn't mean later on we can behave in ways God forbids. The difference is that Paul was following laws as THE MEANS to an end he could never attain. Christians, on the other hand, never contravene what Jesus asks as THE RESULT of being saved.

JESUS

Matthew 5:16-18 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

I've been outside this morning and EARTH IS STILL THERE. God's laws still exist, not as a means to gain Redemption from sin but as consistent with everything we do as a result of accepting Jesus – by letting one's light shine. Whatever Christians do, according to The Bible, will never contravene by one jot or tittle anything He has asked us to do. Or not do.

TITTLE

Zephaniah 1:7-9 Hold thy peace at the presence of the Lord GOD: for the day of the LORD is at hand: for the LORD hath prepared a sacrifice, he hath bid his guests. And it shall come to pass in the day of the LORD'S sacrifice, that I will punish the princes, and the king's children, and all such as are clothed with strange apparel. In the same day also will I punish all those that leap on the threshold, which fill their masters' houses with violence and deceit.

Some examples of strange apparel have already been posted. And by any standard such attire is strange. That is one of the details Jesus referred to – and I've highlighted another activity certain to be punished. Leaping like gazelles and dressing up for species appropriation come under the heading of jots and tittles.

That is why I'm glad you chose Philippians for your introduction. Paul was anxious that they didn't go off the rails like he had done and how to avoid that is so easy: Jesus explains it right there in Matthew. I hope you see the importance of understanding what God expects and again He sets a clear standard, available to all who believe in Jesus Christ.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

Now, your average Kentuckian may be a furry as you are claiming, but community standards at Landover (Bible based ofc., again verses on request, furry thread has 'em) may be slightly different.

I never said I was from kentucky. (I'm originally from Florida.)


I also never said that all Kentucky people were Furries either.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole

If that's so, point out a single thing not perverted in this photograph.

There's nothing perverted going on-LOL!


Everyone's just standing there having their picture taken.

[Shadoe_Hare]

Originally Posted by Roland

Thank you for pointing that Willow out. I disagree with you however. That Willow has become weeping due to human interference. I assume True Christians™ would believe that Willow to be an abomination.

Aspirin originally came from willow trees, so they can't be all bad. Everything has good in it if you look hard enough.