[Adam Fag]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!

https://newdiscourses.com/translations-from-the-wokish/

What is BAME? I looked it up but it's not there.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!

"Voices" as in "listen to black voices" = "spokespeople for rich white yuppies'' as in "listen to black spokespeople for rich white yuppies".

And by "spokespeople" I mean rhetorical human shields, (see the first post above.)

Ever wonder why the CTRL-Left says "listen to [identity] voices" instead of "listen to [identity] people"?

It's because [identity] people usually don't agree with the CTRL-Left. But the CTRL-left doesn't want to you listen to [identity] people.

They admit this. That's why they talk about "internalized oppression" and "false consciousness" and say "you ain't black" to people who obviously are.

Who gets to decide who has true consciousness? Who gets to decide who is black and who "ain't"? Rich white yuppies, of course.

When the CTRL-left looks at [identity] people, they don't see people - they see "voices": human shields and cannon fodder.

This is why black people riot: it's the only way they can get any sympathy from the white yuppie democrats who control the cities. Blacks are saying "look at me, I'm violent, I'm good cannon fodder for your revolution." And then the white democrats do nothing beyond gestures, knowing that they can direct the anger at country people who have nothing to do with how cities are run. Then white yuppies keep mismanaging the cities. They see blacks as attack dogs who get more vicious the more you abuse them.

This is why republican riots don't work. If violence had ever becomes a part of our plan, we will simply shoot all the democrats overnight. Your ability to dress like a shaman and steal the Senate podium provides nothing to our coalition.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!

Do you want corporate monopolies censoring the political arena? Congratulations, you're a "free speech moderate". Don't trust corporate monopolies to censor politics? You're a "free speech absolutist" you radical weirdo you.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!


larger here 700px


How is a monopolist different from an oligarch? For anyone interested, those represented are: Salt, Paper¹ [various], Coal, Tin, Sugar, Iron, Oil, Copper and Steel² [various]


1 = envelopes, paper bags
2 = beams, nails, agricultural equipment

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!

A monopolist is someone who faces no competition. If your bookstore chain is the only place anyone can buy books, you get to burn books you don't like and nobody can do anything about it.

Monopoly-by-monoculture is where an industry faces no cultural competition. In this case, you have multiple bookstores owned by different people, all of whom are strict Mormons who burn any books that aren't Mormon enough for them.

An oligarch is a member of an oligarchy, which is a tiny group of people that rule a nation. Nobody agrees on how small the group has to be, or how much power it needs to have, in order to be called an oligarchy.

If you are a journalist, or Hollywood scriptwriter, "oligarch" means "any Slav who isn't a low-level gang member". Journalists and scriptwriters get away with using racist stereotypes because they have monopoly-by-monoculture.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Demagogues Dictionary! A blistering blizzard of buzzwords!

Thank you for the distinction. Sometimes words change over time, quite rapidly when demagoguery is involved. There was mention of a couple of terms in earlier posts but no entries of their own.

identify

This seems expected to cause 3rd parties to see the 1st party in the same way they see themselves. Friends, whom you've advised already, are 2nd parties here so a 3rd party [me, for instance] magically now sees the group "correctly" and will adjust language appropriately. This seems to reverse the usual usual sequence of identification.

EXAMPLE 1

What is that over there? [a bird] [a plane] [a rock] [a potato] Identifying the object involves walking closer and applying specific tests. Does it have feathers? [no] Does it have wings? [no] Can I cut it? [no] Must be a rock. Obviously there'd been other categories eliminated [hot air balloon] [atomic bomb] [worm] at an early stage so we're choosing from a limited range of options in this example. The point is that identification starts with the observer and flows outwards. The object does not identify itself and transmit by telepathy.

EXAMPLE 2

As we saw, above, information is necessary to identify an object. If the object has language, it could announce information about itself but until that happened there'd be no way to discern how it chose to identify itself or if it cared how others perceived it to be. Travel between different exotic (or tedious) locations reveals a wide range of perceptions! How I'm referred to is a matter of supreme indifference to me. "Identify" in the woke paradigm however is the primum mobile within which all other offences live and move and have their being, whether they've told you or not, whether telepathic beams are being transmitted or not and whether you care or not. And in this case, I don't.

phobic

Being in a generous mood, I'll allow 3 types of -phobic. One concerns minerals. A good example would be over-dry soil; when watered by your watering can the water just runs off [left] or pools in a little hollow [right] and won't soak in. This type of soil is hydrophobic. Most gardeners will have seen this and know how to fix it.

This can also refer to an irrational fear – or perhaps in the case of spiders, snakes, man-eating tigers and so on an excessive degree of fear. Any of Cain's children not having this fear would be well & truly out of the breeding stock by Noah's day and although not everyone is arachnophobic, most people have a sense of caution. Same with snakes and tigers. The 3rd type is what happens to dogs when they get rabies. Hydrophobia is one of the symptoms and was sometimes used as a name for the disease.

In bizarro land however, this word has some other meaning altogether. It's never explained what that meaning is and the residents there never adjust their use of language to accommodate me (actually that would be NOT adjusting language at all but simply going with common usage from the time of Henry VIII or earlier) while taking umbrage if I don't use a reinvented usage to accommodate them. Even if the telepathy failed and I don't know how they identify in the first place.

These 2 words have appeared before but not under their own entry.