X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Originally posted by Peter Roy View Post
    It isn't really darwinian evolution when we speak about geological phenomenon.

    Don't mix different fields of science.
    But the evolutionist keeps telling us that rocks, pebbles, us, TB bacteria and so on are all made out of the same stuff. How could that be if the "stuff" didn't "evolve" from 0 cells [rock] to 1 cell to 2 cells and all the way to whales?

    Are you suggesting that living things were a separate creation? We already know that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Shout GLORY!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Originally posted by Peter Roy View Post
    It isn't really darwinian evolution when we speak about geological phenomenon.

    Don't mix different fields of science.
    It is all the same subject, Genesis 1,

    YIC

    Jack

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Originally posted by Peter Roy View Post
    It isn't really darwinian evolution when we speak about geological phenomenon.

    Don't mix different fields of science.
    All science is the same field: looking for reasons to deny God's creation of the earth and firmament.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Roy
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Originally posted by Mary Etheldreda View Post
    Typical Darwinist solution - demand evidence / ignore evidence / demand evidence.
    It isn't really darwinian evolution when we speak about geological phenomenon.

    Don't mix different fields of science.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Originally posted by Peter Roy View Post
    The hammer is not petrified, it is encased in stone. This makes it a concretion instead of a true fossil. That means someone lost his hammer in a hole or empty space that filled up with sediment, then the sediment was cemented together, forming the concretion, whereupon the concretion came loose from the surrounding matrix and was ultimately found by Carl Baugh. Scientists are well aware that concretions can form in only a few years, and that they can include fossils from older sediments.
    The claim that it was found in Cretaceous rocks is unsupported. In fact, different accounts place Baugh's hammer in different sediments, including Ordovician, and Devonian layers, as well as Cretaceous. In actuality, the hammer was found loose, not embedded in any rock strata. Baugh has repeatedly refused to have actual scientific dating methods applied to the hammer or the rock. As such, until he actually allows his hammer to be verifiably tested, he can not legitimately claim that it is "old." He has no justification at all for claiming it is Cretaceous just because some nearby rocks were Cretaceous anymore than me finding a warm bag of french fries in a sixty year old building proves french fries can stay fresh for sixty years.
    Scientists do not claim the Earth is old because fossils take a long time to fossilize. In fact, scientists are well aware that some kinds of fossils form quickly, like insects being trapped in tree resin.
    Typical Darwinist solution - demand evidence / ignore evidence / demand evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Roy
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    The hammer is not petrified, it is encased in stone. This makes it a concretion instead of a true fossil. That means someone lost his hammer in a hole or empty space that filled up with sediment, then the sediment was cemented together, forming the concretion, whereupon the concretion came loose from the surrounding matrix and was ultimately found by Carl Baugh. Scientists are well aware that concretions can form in only a few years, and that they can include fossils from older sediments.
    The claim that it was found in Cretaceous rocks is unsupported. In fact, different accounts place Baugh's hammer in different sediments, including Ordovician, and Devonian layers, as well as Cretaceous. In actuality, the hammer was found loose, not embedded in any rock strata. Baugh has repeatedly refused to have actual scientific dating methods applied to the hammer or the rock. As such, until he actually allows his hammer to be verifiably tested, he can not legitimately claim that it is "old." He has no justification at all for claiming it is Cretaceous just because some nearby rocks were Cretaceous anymore than me finding a warm bag of french fries in a sixty year old building proves french fries can stay fresh for sixty years.
    Scientists do not claim the Earth is old because fossils take a long time to fossilize. In fact, scientists are well aware that some kinds of fossils form quickly, like insects being trapped in tree resin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    Glory to GOD!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Evilutionists: Explain THIS!

    AMEN!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Originally posted by Andreas View Post


    I guess, God is not very confident.
    Jesus is confident enough to send you screaming into hellfire. Good luck spouting off with your mouth full of sulfur and your bum full of demon boner. You think you're clever mocking God, don't you...

    Leave a comment:


  • Andreas
    replied
    Exodus 20:3
    Thou shalt have no other gods before me.


    I guess, God is not very confident.

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Originally posted by Andreas View Post
    I bet Muslims claim exactly the same...

    I like Landover but I'm also keen on Buddhism.
    I guessed as much! A worshipper of the Fat Chink with Slitty eyes.
    Your kind are not liked much around these parts.

    Exodus 20:3
    Thou shalt have no other gods before me.


    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Andreas
    replied
    There is NO OTHER point of view.
    I bet Muslims claim exactly the same...

    With so many religions and churches, I don't know which one to choose. I like Landover but I'm also keen on Buddhism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Al E Pistle
    replied
    You must have misread my earlier post. The COW-RAN is mostly copied from the Bible. The Bible also correctly predicts that the antiChrist will fool many people AND that there is more than one antiChrist. MOOHAMMAD is one. The pope is the other one. They are now working together to start the Tribulation.

    That is fact. No questions are anticipated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Originally posted by Andreas View Post
    Qou'ran is a mixture of Judaism, Christianity and Arab traditional religions.

    Another book claims there are many anti-that-book's-god's, Christianity being one of them.

    You must look things from different points of view!
    If there's one thing that get's on my nerves It's a Lieberal Towel-head lover.

    There is NO OTHER point of view.

    The Bible (KJV1611) is the word of GOD. There being only one God, he being on our side means that there is only one Truth.

    When the Mudslimes from Talibanistan bomb your kiddiewinks in their sleep, you'll wish you had listened to us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...