X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nurse Clampett
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by Vavoline Johnson View Post
    Next thing yo gonna say that iffen I keep picking up my Chihuawa dog and carry him round all da time, he legs be fallin off. It jist done make any sense at all.
    This kid will probably tell you the Chihuahua will evolve into some sort of mutant Mexican't hot dog.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vavoline Johnson
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    HA....HA...HA....really now, can you pat ur self on the back of do u want me? as in theory, it does not happen over the course of only say 100 years, its 1,000s so, when shoes become more regularly available u don't need the pinky toes, cause extram help with a ballnce is not needed and i used another example, your spleen, because 1,000s of years ago we ate very corse hard to break down food so we had two stomachs to break it down, over time the need for it dwindeled and so did the second stomach (well its realy the first one :] ) .
    Next thing yo gonna say that iffen I keep picking up my Chihuawa dog and carry him round all da time, he legs be fallin off. It jist done make any sense at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary O'Bryan Thorne
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Deary me. I've read through 43 posts in this thread and out of the 13 or so written by this Tolerance person, I still have not a clue as to what this person is saying. Young man or young woman, please put the crack pipe down and back away slowly - get out of the house before you become consumed by the fumes. You aren't making a bit of sense - rambling on about hating your pinky toe to the point of chopping it off, is truly a sign that those psychedelics in which you also indulge are making you completely mad. You're stumbling your way to hell.


    Mary

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jim Osborne
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    I did read your post and gave you a perfectly logical rebuttal towards it. Why don't you read for a change? People are not going to lose their pinky toes, get off the subject. As much as I hate that sinful movie The Big Lebowski, I do think Walter's advice is warranted here...

    FORGET ABOUT THE @#&@#&@#* TOE!

    Leave a comment:


  • tolarence
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Why don't you read,im not talking about the future im talking about the past, i said 1,000s of years in the past to now, and really sleep in their shoes....never knew i walked around in my sleep, regardless i never said anything about monkeys, now did i, i said after God made man READ SIR READ!!

    Even if i don't have the pinky toe right, i do still have the spleen

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jim Osborne
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    HA....HA...HA....really now, can you pat ur self on the back of do u want me? as in theory, it does not happen over the course of only say 100 years, its 1,000s so, when shoes become more regularly available u don't need the pinky toes, cause extram help with a ballnce is not needed and i used another example, your spleen, because 1,000s of years ago we ate very corse hard to break down food so we had two stomachs to break it down, over time the need for it dwindeled and so did the second stomach (well its realy the first one :] ) .
    Seriously, what are you smoking? Now you're laying claim that you can see into the future thousands of years from now? Okay, if you say so, Nostradamus.

    But let's look at your interesting pinky theory. People have been wearing shoes for thousands of years...no one is being born without pinky toes. Even so, you realize people in the future will not wear shoes any more than we do now, right? What, you think they're going to sleep in their shoes? Shower in their shoes? If they lose their pinky toes, what happens when they take off their shoes? Pretty screwed, huh?

    Your spleen argument is completely vapid as well. You evolutionists claim we evolved from monkeys...how come monkeys don't have two stomachs? Gorillas don't have two stomachs and they eat pretty coarse food. The only animals that I know of that have multiple stomachs are ruminants...you know, cattle, goats, sheep, and the like.

    Seriously, friend, put the crack pipe down and pick up a Bible!

    Leave a comment:


  • tolarence
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by Rev. Jim Osborne View Post
    I agree Nurse. Despite it's small size and apparent uselessness, the smallest toe is vital for balancing, as your friend has shown. This "tolerance" person must be smoking some bad crack to claim that evolution is causing people to lose pinky toes. I've never heard of such a thing. Then again, you'd have to be a crack smoker in the first place to believe in evolution!

    HA....HA...HA....really now, can you pat ur self on the back of do u want me? as in theory, it does not happen over the course of only say 100 years, its 1,000s so, when shoes become more regularly available u don't need the pinky toes, cause extram help with a ballnce is not needed and i used another example, your spleen, because 1,000s of years ago we ate very corse hard to break down food so we had two stomachs to break it down, over time the need for it dwindeled and so did the second stomach (well its realy the first one :] ) .

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jim Osborne
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    I agree Nurse. Despite it's small size and apparent uselessness, the smallest toe is vital for balancing, as your friend has shown. This "tolerance" person must be smoking some bad crack to claim that evolution is causing people to lose pinky toes. I've never heard of such a thing. Then again, you'd have to be a crack smoker in the first place to believe in evolution!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nurse Clampett
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    NO , im saying evolution is not about getting stronger just adapting.
    What can you possibly adapt to without a pinkie toe??
    Loss of a pinkie toe is the weakest, stupidest excuse for evolution I've heard!

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    NO , im saying evolution is not about getting stronger just adapting.
    You are an utter idiot. There is no such thing as evolution, only God.

    Leave a comment:


  • tolarence
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    NO , im saying evolution is not about getting stronger just adapting.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    Woah, wait, losing parts, evolving does not mean " to get stronger or more powerful" i think you might be a little confused on that.
    Now what are you yammering about, child? Losing body parts makes a person weaker.

    Leave a comment:


  • tolarence
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Woah, wait, losing parts, evolving does not mean " to get stronger or more powerful" i think you might be a little confused on that.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by tolarence View Post
    Yes i get God can do that, but can i believe in both?
    No

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Tolerance

    Originally posted by Nurse Clampett View Post
    I wish I had video of that. It might have taught our teen troll that when you start dropping parts you're on a down slope, not "evolving."
    So true Sister, a picture or Video is worth a thousand words. Praise Jesus!

    Leave a comment:

Working...