X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Betty Lambskin
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Cactusses ?



    They'll be no cussing in here, mr science-pants!

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    The cactus were are at the top of the floating vegetable mats, thus high and dry out of the waters. Other plants rested on top of them keeping the rain off them.

    Anymore questions Mr. Science?
    Cactusses are the only plants in the desert, so how do you think they get on the "vegetable mats"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Betty Lambskin
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    It's equally amazing how Noah's boys were able to canoe it up to the Polar Ice Caps to retrieve the penguins and polar bears! Now that's gumption!

    Don't make children like they used to, eh LORD?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Do you actually believe that? There are plants (eg: cactus) who wouldn't survive so much water. So how come they are still here? The flood never happened.
    The cactus were are at the top of the floating vegetable mats, thus high and dry out of the waters. Other plants rested on top of them keeping the rain off them.

    Anymore questions Mr. Science?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    From a fully grown olive tree.

    The plants detached themselves from the soil during the flood and formed vast mats of vegetation. This is why the plants didn’t drown. Once the waters drained away into the ocean or evaporated. the olive tree was beached in the mud, took root and began growing.
    Do you actually believe that? There are plants (eg: cactus) who wouldn't survive so much water. So how come they are still here? The flood never happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    No, science never changes, it just gets more detailed. The bible is the same old fairytale as then (the people who wrote it, the disciples, were a stupid bunch of rednecks).
    How is The Bible a fairy tale? Assuredly you must have read of how the story is confirmed by Sumerian records like The Kings List?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    "Continental drift" was abandonded as a theory back in the 1960's, even by your monkey worshiping scientists. "Plate tectonics" is the new fashionable theory. Which I'm sure will be tossed out soon, only to be replaced with another eqally ridiculous pile of nonsense.

    You see, we worship God, not science. God never changes, science changes all the time.

    No, science never changes, it just gets more detailed. The bible is the same old fairytale as then (the people who wrote it, the disciples, were a stupid bunch of rednecks).

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Good point Brother Williams. It was probable that the Ark was towing the hydrophonic vegetation mats behind it during the Flood period. The mats must have been quite dense to provide the necessary amount of plants to support the quick species population recoveries scene.

    These large mats would allow Noah and his family to tend to the plants and gather fodder for the animals on the Ark. The mass of vegetation mats would dampen the wave action on the sea about the Ark making it even more stable and reduced animal stress on the Ark. Noah’s family would easily be able to work on the mats by simply walking on them.
    I have to give you points for vivid imaginations.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by WilliamJenningsBryan View Post
    I have to weigh in with you on this one, Pastor BJ. If the dung was sent overboard, either through a toilet system (and archeologists keep finding earlier examples of these) or shoveled, it would have provided a nutrient rich floodwater for the plants to thrive in. This would have been an example of the first hydroponics.
    Good point Brother Williams. It was probable that the Ark was towing the hydrophonic vegetation mats behind it during the Flood period. The mats must have been quite dense to provide the necessary amount of plants to support the quick species population recoveries scene.

    These large mats would allow Noah and his family to tend to the plants and gather fodder for the animals on the Ark. The mass of vegetation mats would dampen the wave action on the sea about the Ark making it even more stable and reduced animal stress on the Ark. Noah’s family would easily be able to work on the mats by simply walking on them.

    Leave a comment:


  • G-Baby
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    You see, we worship God, not science. God never changes, science changes all the time.
    Like I said, sciense is PROGRESSIVE...

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by WilliamJenningsBryan View Post
    I have to weigh in with you on this one, Pastor BJ. If the dung was sent overboard, either through a toilet system (and archeologists keep finding earlier examples of these) or shoveled, it would have provided a nutrient rich floodwater for the plants to thrive in. This would have been an example of the first hydroponics.

    Hydroponic olive trees? Now I've heard it all.

    Leave a comment:


  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of crap!

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    From a fully grown olive tree.

    The plants detached themselves from the soil during the flood and formed vast mats of vegetation. This is why the plants didn’t drown. Once the waters drained away into the ocean or evaporated. the olive tree was beached in the mud, took root and began growing.
    I have to weigh in with you on this one, Pastor BJ. If the dung was sent overboard, either through a toilet system (and archeologists keep finding earlier examples of these) or shoveled, it would have provided a nutrient rich floodwater for the plants to thrive in. This would have been an example of the first hydroponics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by G-Baby View Post
    Sister Talitha,

    Can I please beg you to give us some answers WORHTY of reading?

    It isn't mentioned in the bible, because the bible is so wrong.
    I would admit: If I give you only one element to compare between the bible and the reality, than I would be wrong. But I gave a lot of comparisons lately, didn't I.


    Continential drift or erosion isn't mentioned in the bible because the bible was written long ago and the people and writer than didn't have much knowledge of science. They tried to seek answers to questions of people every day. They never thought that one day science would proof Christian religion wrong. But it DID. And THAT's why those 2 things aren't mentioned in the bible, because the bible has fell behind with the modern human.

    PS: Try to keep the intellectual level high here, please...
    "Continental drift" was abandonded as a theory back in the 1960's, even by your monkey worshiping scientists. "Plate tectonics" is the new fashionable theory. Which I'm sure will be tossed out soon, only to be replaced with another eqally ridiculous pile of nonsense.

    You see, we worship God, not science. God never changes, science changes all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • G-Baby
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    You really do have "Tunnel Vision" about all this don't you?

    There is absolutely no mention of Continental Drift OR Erosion in any Bible!

    Get Real!
    Sister Talitha,

    Can I please beg you to give us some answers WORHTY of reading?

    It isn't mentioned in the bible, because the bible is so wrong.
    I would admit: If I give you only one element to compare between the bible and the reality, than I would be wrong. But I gave a lot of comparisons lately, didn't I.


    Continential drift or erosion isn't mentioned in the bible because the bible was written long ago and the people and writer than didn't have much knowledge of science. They tried to seek answers to questions of people every day. They never thought that one day science would proof Christian religion wrong. But it DID. And THAT's why those 2 things aren't mentioned in the bible, because the bible has fell behind with the modern human.

    PS: Try to keep the intellectual level high here, please...

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Now that's a lot of doodoo!

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    You really do have "Tunnel Vision" about all this don't you?

    There is absolutely no mention of Continental Drift OR Erosion in any Bible!

    Get Real!

    And you say I have tunnel vision?

    Leave a comment:

Working...