Originally posted by tom111
View Post
X
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
Looks like your bias is clear, friend. Ask your professor to come talk to us. You are grossly unqualified.
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
Sadly, tom has played out as an idiot. No other way to put it. Simple 'science' questions that any grade schooler can answer, he was clueless. Even the simplest one of all, the difference between hemispheres of a female brain. He had nary a clue.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
No it hasn't! What evolutionary advantage has there been in the concave hemoglobin? Why do not humans and camels rule the earth side by side? Why was there not an Jesus equivalent of a camel? (and don't give me anything about the Hunchback of Notredame - he was a catlick!)Originally posted by tom111 View Post[...]the direct question that has been put to me has been answered, what is your question.
PS, we think that Mormons are morons; please do not confuse Independent Baptists with any other "social gathering".
Another question - Why the platypus? Whither the echidna? Whence the nigra? Why for the virus, which is probably not even alive?
Do the wonders of God not abound?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
No tom, we understand exactly what you say. You thought you'd argue that we came from fish or monkeys. However, part of that argument also covers the questions we asked that you had zero answer for. You, a biologist from the mighty Oxford. You are an embarrassment to the free Godly world. You should be ashamed.
Such a witty salutation!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
you people seem to diliberately misunderstand everything i say, their is no point persuing this further.Originally posted by James Hutchins View PostBut tom... I am the (in your words) 'mormon', what could I possibly know.
The reality here, tom, is that it appears I have a much stronger education than you. In fact, I think you'll find, nearly ever member in good standing has more knowledge than you.
See tom, you came to a battle of wits unarmed. Not a good choice though, knowing you as I do now, I am not surprised. You simply did not know any better.
Your best chance of saving any respect is admit your massive mistakes, stay and learn.
oh well, hail satan, good night.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
But tom... I am the (in your words) 'mormon', what could I possibly know.Originally posted by tom111 View Postthe reason it took me that long is because there is a time limit between posts for me and my infarction.
dont ask me questions you know the answer to.
The reality here, tom, is that it appears I have a much stronger education than you. In fact, I think you'll find, nearly ever member in good standing has more knowledge than you.
See tom, you came to a battle of wits unarmed. Not a good choice though, knowing you as I do now, I am not surprised. You simply did not know any better.
Your best chance of saving any respect is admit your massive mistakes, stay and learn.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
the reason it took me that long is because there is a time limit between posts for me and my infarction.Originally posted by James Hutchins View PostIt took you five minutes to ask this?
OK, it seems I'll have to walk you to the evilutionist answer...
Man....Woman----> They are different
Brain, has a right and left side...... Woman----->How do they think (hint---Evilutionists have a 'excuse')
Difference in the brain????? Gee.... Which side is dominant and therefore a greater mass?
tom, I thought you might be a tad entertaining. Instead, you are turning out to be an utter dolt. You should show the registrar this thread and demand a refund from Oxford. Use the money to learn how to dig ditches.
dont ask me questions you know the answer to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
It took you five minutes to ask this?Originally posted by tom111 View Postwhat does that have to do with evolution and creationism.
OK, it seems I'll have to walk you to the evilutionist answer...
Man....Woman----> They are different
Brain, has a right and left side...... Woman----->How do they think (hint---Evilutionists have a 'excuse')
Difference in the brain????? Gee.... Which side is dominant and therefore a greater mass?
tom, I thought you might be a tad entertaining. Instead, you are turning out to be an utter dolt. You should show the registrar this thread and demand a refund from Oxford. Use the money to learn how to dig ditches.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
what does that have to do with evolution and creationism.Originally posted by James Hutchins View PostOK, what is the difference in mass between the right and left hemispheres of the average female brain.
Remember, no peeking.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
Come on tom, I am not getting any younger. This is a easy one, just like the blood question.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
OK, what is the difference in mass between the right and left hemispheres of the average female brain.Originally posted by tom111 View Posthow many times must i answer a question with fact before you consider it answered, you don't have to believe my answer to be true, (considering the nature of the website you probably won't) but i have answered the question with scientific fact.
next question.
Remember, no peeking.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
how many times must i answer a question with fact before you consider it answered, you don't have to believe my answer to be true, (considering the nature of the website you probably won't) but i have answered the question with scientific fact.Originally posted by James Hutchins View PostB.S. answer. Either answer it or leave and never return. I tire of your silliness.
next question.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
Time is up, little tom.
No I am no biologist, my degree was in Organic Chemistry (only a masters) from Princeton, so I did not know the exact explanation, though Ihad an idea.
I got this:
From here.Mammalian erythrocytes are biconcave disks: flattened and depressed in the center, with a dumb-bell shaped cross section. This shape (as well as the loss of organelles) optimizes the cell for the exchange of oxygen with its surroundings. The cells are flexible so as to fit through tiny capillaries, where they release their oxygen load. Erythrocytes are circular, except in the camel family Camelidae, where they are oval.
Bye tom.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
B.S. answer. Either answer it or leave and never return. I tire of your silliness.Originally posted by tom111 View Posti have already answered that, their are many types of the heamaglobin protien in many different animals, the fact that the human and camel heamaglobin molecule have the same chemical structure is down to prabability.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.
i have already answered that, their are many types of the heamaglobin protien in many different animals, the fact that the human and camel heamaglobin molecule have the same chemical structure is down to prabability.Originally posted by James Hutchins View PostSure do! Being you are a Oxford biologist, you will have the scientific (lies) answer to this:
Only camels and humans have concave hemoglobin. Why is this?
I know you will give me a real answer (and some wiki BS) as you are so qualified and came here to be challenged.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: