[Alvin Moss]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

the reason I am an atheist is that I have read the KJ bible from cover to cover and realised how simply stupid it was. All your credibility is zero as you don't believe in gravity, heliocentrism, evolution ect.

Why do so many unsaved, atheist wretches come here and claim to have read the KJV "from cover to cover"? They even use the same expression, over and over. No one believes you, fool, not even the God mocker above.

[Didymus Much]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

the reason I am an atheist is that I have read the KJ bible from cover to cover and realised how simply stupid it was...

Bullshit, or you would have known that the Bible says unicorns exist.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

the reason I am an atheist is that I have read the KJ bible from cover to cover and realised how simply stupid it was. All your credibility is zero as you don't believe in gravity, heliocentrism, evolution ect.

[Didymus Much]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

...And who cares what it says it the bible, it's just complete nonsense anyway

Says the ostrich that hasn't even read it. Your credibility approaches zero.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

Just by my definition, I said the sunis at the centre of the SOLAR SYSTEM, not the universe. And who cares what it says it the bible, it's just complete nonsense anyway

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

Heliocentric is simply the idea of anything with a star at the centre. The facts are the heliocentric model of our solar system, nobody said anything about the universe.

Even by your twisted cherry-picked so-called definition - what difference does it make to anyone?

And if it doesn't make a difference, where's the problem in your believing it?

Why be hateful and persecute Christians?

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

I'm sure that if the Sun was considered the center of the universe that God would've mentioned that in the Bible at some point.




Since He didn't, well...it ain't.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

Heliocentric is simply the idea of anything with a star at the centre. The facts are the heliocentric model of our solar system, nobody said anything about the universe.

[Basilissa]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

No, heliocentrism is the name for a sun centred solar system, not universe

Heliocentric model:

Based on ongoing observations of the motions of the planets, as well as previous theories from classical antiquity and the Islamic World, Copernicus’ proposed a model of the Universe where the Earth, the planets and the stars all revolved around the Sun.

Go back to school, kid, and try not to sleep through classes this time.

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

No, heliocentrism is the name for a sun centred solar system, not universe

[Basilissa]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

I really don't care about your preposterous nit pickings of language, but what proof do you have that evolution, heliocentrism ect is not true

Wait, what?

So you actually think that the Sun is the center of the entire universe?

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

I really don't care about your preposterous nit pickings of language, but what proof do you have that evolution, heliocentrism ect is not true

[VictoryOS]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

Round earthism? Is that really what they call it?

[Elmer G. White]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

If you are stupid enough not to believe in facts like atomic theory, round earthism, heliocentrism, gravity and evolution, then it is not worth my time trying to explain them to you. If it were not for all those things, you would not exist.

Mr. Snark,

I have underlined in your nice post the part that requires some more attention. I've done it for your benefit to help to revise your reply and to develop your skills in debate.

Calling someone stupid is simply an appeal to person. It is called the ad hominem fallacy. People may be stupid and still know the Truth™. If a retard can tell you that falling from a rooftop might kill you, is his information flawed because of his inadequate brain capacity. Of course it isn't. In addition to this fallacy your post contains absolutely no evidence material but you claim we are wrong based on our personality and our characteristics.

Matthew 5:3
Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Even if we were stupid, you would still have to assess the actual content of the opening post. This is where you have failed miserably. However, I'd be more than happy to discuss the actual issues with you if and when we can discard the ballast of fallacies from your replies.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[GoldenShower]

Re: The 10 worstly mistaken fields of secular science!

If you are stupid enough not to believe in facts like atomic theory, round earthism, heliocentrism, gravity and evolution, then it is not worth my time trying to explain them to you. If it were not for all those things, you would not exist.