[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Symbolism

Yet you say religion is defined by God so how in fact can God be defined by a religion and that relgion be true if it is religion that defines God? …

very thought provoking - I will be thinking about that sentence all night.
often we dream answers, but I can't comment how reliable dreams might be .. ..

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Symbolism

Yet you say religion is defined by God so how in fact can God be defined by a religion and that relgion be true if it is religion that defines God? Therefore the interpretation of man.

You've been smoking nigra weed, haven't you.

I'll bet you think you're making sense.

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

Yet you say religion is defined by God so how in fact can God be defined by a religion and that relgion be true if it is religion that defines God? Therefore the interpretation of man.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Symbolism

There in lye the rub. God is not defined by a religion. And therefore can not be, in good consciousness, attributed to what man has created. Only though man and their need to control does god ahve a place.

The entire bible is based on experience of man and what man considered to be god. Yet I have seen not one story about God itself.

So I say "God is not defined by a religion"
..and you reply: Aha! but "..God is not defined by a religion"
We DO NOT attribute divine attributes to what man has created, YOU DO. Geometry & mathematics (which includes arithmetic and algebra before you start deifying them too) are incomplete and imperfect human inventions used to describe the world around us. If they were complete or perfect there would be no new publications in academic journals.
Consider a right angle of 90°
It can be divided into 3 smaller angles of 30° each and OH LOOK AT THAT one of those smaller angles IS EXACTLY HALF OF THE REMAINING THREE!
..er yes, we divided the right angle into three equal parts.
AND LOOK! AND LOOK! THERE ARE 3 ANGLES AND EACH ONE IS 30° AND 3x30 IS 90!! sorry, that isn't magic. It's just because we describe a circle as 360° -- and before you say THAT is magic, we don't ONLY define a circle as 360°, we also describe angles as radians
(..in which case there are 2pi radians in a circle)

I don't normally use lye, by the way




I usually use sugar soap, but cloudy ammonia also gets good reports



I hope this is helpful. Someone else will be along soon to discuss radians with you, perhaps.

[Levi Jones]

Re: Symbolism

There in lye the rub. God is not defined by a religion. And therefore can not be, in good consciousness, attributed to what man has created. Only though man and their need to control does god ahve a place.

The entire bible is based on experience of man and what man considered to be god. Yet I have seen not one story about God itself.

Who are you trying to convince of this, Roman? Us or yourself? You'll never convince us that the Bible isn't 100% fake!

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

God is not defined by a religion, it is the other way around: True religion is defined by - and through grace given to us - by God.
Ephesians 1:9 .. Ephesians 2:5 .. III John 1:11

We follow what comes to us from God - He does not manufacture Himself in our image, as you suggest.

There in lye the rub. God is not defined by a religion. And therefore can not be, in good consciousness, attributed to what man has created. Only though man and their need to control does god ahve a place.

The entire bible is based on experience of man and what man considered to be god. Yet I have seen not one story about God itself.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Symbolism

Every thing you have just said can just as easily be directed toward you. All you have proven is your inability to think that you might actually be wrong. This is why more people have died fighting religious battles than any other.

And it's always nice to see how you assume I don't believe in God just becasue you think your description of God is somehow correct.

We have the KJV Bible, God's Holy Word to back up our assertions

You have the voices in your head

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

There are many facets to the life dynamic of mere human beings, so why not of God? Why are you always trying to "fit" God where YOU want Him to be?
You aren't His GOD!

That is where you lack your understanding. You make God a clinical or spirographic study based on what twerps trying to "define" God as being, for themselves. It's morons like you who tend to take someone else's "theory" OF God, over what God actually IS, hence losing the REAL LORD in the process.

Oh and RomanK, it's obvious that your life without God in it, is a permanent infraction.

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

Every thing you have just said can just as easily be directed toward you. All you have proven is your inability to think that you might actually be wrong. This is why more people have died fighting religious battles than any other.

And it's always nice to see how you assume I don't believe in God just becasue you think your description of God is somehow correct.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Symbolism

And you think god would be so petty as to be defined by a religion. But I can't tell you anything. You still think a trinity >3 is somehow 1.


Oh wait an infraction is inorder

God is not defined by a religion, it is the other way around: True religion is defined by - and through grace given to us - by God.
Ephesians 1:9 .. Ephesians 2:5 .. III John 1:11

We follow what comes to us from God - He does not manufacture Himself in our image, as you suggest.

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Symbolism

And you think god would be so petty as to be defined by a religion. But I can't tell you anything. You still think a trinity >3 is somehow 1.


Oh wait an infraction is inorder

There are many facets to the life dynamic of mere human beings, so why not of God? Why are you always trying to "fit" God where YOU want Him to be?
You aren't His GOD!

That is where you lack your understanding. You make God a clinical or spirographic study based on what twerps trying to "define" God as being, for themselves. It's morons like you who tend to take someone else's "theory" OF God, over what God actually IS, hence losing the REAL LORD in the process.

Oh and RomanK, it's obvious that your life without God in it, is a permanent infraction.

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

And you think god would be so petty as to be defined by a religion. But I can't tell you anything. You still think a trinity >3 is somehow 1.


Oh wait an infraction is inorder

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Symbolism

Us is Plural and Royalty use it as a seperation from commoners, family entitlement.

US was a Sumerian Tribe. You know the race that has been credited with our creation as slaves.

You presume GOD has no entitlement but mere human royalty is allowed to?

WOW, you are clutching at any straw, rather than having to deal with the reality OF GOD HIMSELF!

Oh... are you a nigra, Mr RomanK?

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

Us is Plural and Royalty use it as a seperation from commoners, family entitlement.

US was a Sumerian Tribe. You know the race that has been credited with our creation as slaves.

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Symbolism

Just one problem with your little quote. A little word called us! If God had written the bible then it should had said I.

And as far as us being able to do with the earth as we will. Yeah we might to do this, but one day we wont have it to do with and bye bye us. Or more to the point you.

WHY would it have to be I? Royality use "WE" and "US" when they are referring to a single entity(being self) too, so who are you to say that GOD HIMSELF cannot use "us"?

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

[RomanK]

Re: Symbolism

Ge:1:26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Just one problem with your little quote. A little word called us! If God had written the bible then it should had said I.

And as far as us being able to do with the earth as we will. Yeah we might to do this, but one day we wont have it to do with and bye bye us. Or more to the point you.