[{Anna}]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Except you people can't even agree on the "answers" today.

It is not about not agreeing
it is how some scientists interpret something they discovered
and we won't know until is one is proven(by new information)
Information which we don't have

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Science can only answer questions
with the information available at the time.
Science can answer some questions but not all
because not all information is available all the time.

Except you people can't even agree on the "answers" today.

[{Anna}]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

So once again you prove that "scientists" can't agree on anything, but we're supposed to "have faith" in them to fix everything.

Yeah, I'll put my faith in the creator. Thanks anyway.

Science can only answer questions
with the information available at the time.
Science can answer some questions but not all
because not all information is available all the time.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Do you know that some scientist says
global warming could cause an ice age
How?

So once again you prove that "scientists" can't agree on anything, but we're supposed to "have faith" in them to fix everything.

Yeah, I'll put my faith in the creator. Thanks anyway.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Your grammar is horrible, but I get the gist.

You don't need the laws of thermodynamics to confirm global warming. The average termperature is rising on earth because of the greenhouse gases created by humans. Pretty simple.

Of course the average temperature is rising. Spring is right around the corner

Why do we never hear about 'global warming' in October?

[{Anna}]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

None of this really makes any sense as the Bible (KJV1611) indicates that the earth is only about 6,000 years old. Anyway, it's pretty cold out right now and we could use some warming and if some "scientists" are correct we need to do all we can do to prevent another ice age.

Do you know that some scientist says
global warming could cause an ice age
How?

In quick summary, if enough cold, fresh water coming from the melting polar ice caps and the melting glaciers of Greenland flows into the northern Atlantic, it will shut down the Gulf Stream, which keeps Europe and northeastern North America warm. The worst-case scenario would be a full-blown return of the last ice age - in a period as short as 2 to 3 years from its onset - and the mid-case scenario would be a period like the "little ice age" of a few centuries ago that disrupted worldwide weather patterns leading to extremely harsh winters, droughts, worldwide desertification, crop failures, and wars around the world.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Your grammar is horrible, but I get the gist.

You don't need the laws of thermodynamics to confirm global warming. The average termperature is rising on earth because of the greenhouse gases created by humans. Pretty simple.

According to "scientists" we are in the Cenozoic period and are still in an "ice age" that started 3 million years ago. There are even "scientists" that claim that all the warming since 1850 is just recovering from the "little ice age".

None of this really makes any sense as the Bible (KJV1611) indicates that the earth is only about 6,000 years old. Anyway, it's pretty cold out right now and we could use some warming and if some "scientists" are correct we need to do all we can do to prevent another ice age.

[Tool of satan]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

No. Not unless you can prove it. Temperatures may be increasing but you have no reason to believe it is anthroengendered.

YIC

There's evidence for it, go look it up.

Humans may not be the cause, or may only be part of the cause, but the evidence supporting the theory that human activities increase the rate of global warming is pretty strong.

Obviously, you think God is doing this or that it isn't happening. So continue believing that.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Your grammar is horrible, but I get the gist.

You don't need the laws of thermodynamics to confirm global warming. The average termperature is rising on earth because of the greenhouse gases created by humans. Pretty simple.

No. Not unless you can prove it. Temperatures may be increasing but you have no reason to believe it is anthroengendered.

YIC

[Tool of satan]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

I find it interesting that there are laws in nature that can't be made by any governments.
It is a fact that laws are created but in nature only God can made them.
Someone know any laws in thermodynamics that says global warmings are true? I guess not!

Your grammar is horrible, but I get the gist.

You don't need the laws of thermodynamics to confirm global warming. The average termperature is rising on earth because of the greenhouse gases created by humans. Pretty simple.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Here informacions about color
No it is illustration of macroevolution

Sorry Anna, but you are wrong. Again. You are showing us just queer shades of color that God gave us. Not one of those colors is alive and changing. How long do you want me to watch them? How long will it take for them to change into a monkey and throw its' poop?

[Titus Templeton]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

I find it interesting that there are laws in nature that can't be made by any governments.
It is a fact that laws are created but in nature only God can made them.
Someone know any laws in thermodynamics that says global warmings are true? I guess not!

[{Anna}]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Of course not! Finally, we are getting though that enormously thick and incredibly empty head of yours. All it illustrates is girly color.
God created all the colors. If you want to know more about them, pray to Him for a Divine Truth.

Here informacions about color
No it is illustration of macroevolution

[James Hutchins]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

....
No,of course that colors don't evolve
That is to illustrate macroevolution

Of course not! Finally, we are getting though that enormously thick and incredibly empty head of yours. All it illustrates is girly color.
God created all the colors. If you want to know more about them, pray to Him for a Divine Truth.

[{Anna}]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Now you're claiming that Gnomes evolve?

No
I said genome