X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    OK
    Earth is spherical
    It rotates araoud Sun and around its axis
    As Earth rotates around its axis to us it seams that
    Sun rotates but it is standing
    So you say...
    God says different
    There is conflict
    So I'm going to believe God

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    You don't see the sun move across the sky? It doesn't move fast. You have to look away for a bit then look back. Surely you notice it rise in the morning and set in the evening on the other edge of the earth...
    OK
    Earth is spherical
    It rotates araoud Sun and around its axis
    As Earth rotates around its axis to us it seams that
    Sun rotates but it is standing

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Really
    What do you think Sun revolves Earth
    And did you look at links?
    You don't see the sun move across the sky? It doesn't move fast. You have to look away for a bit then look back. Surely you notice it rise in the morning and set in the evening on the other edge of the earth...

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    The sun is part of the earth and firmament. It's inside the firmament. How is that external? Maybe you don't understand words.
    Really
    What do you think Sun revolves Earth
    And did you look at links?

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Yes they do
    And I fail to see point of this post
    The Sun is that what you call "large external energy source"
    The sun is part of the earth and firmament. It's inside the firmament. How is that external? Maybe you don't understand words.

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Zechariah Smyth View Post
    Last time I checked, I didn't see any extension cords going up to the sun.


    Energy from Sun comes from via sunlight
    created in its core by nuclear fusion
    Solar energy

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr Laurence Niles
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Second law of thermodynamics could be applies only if
    Earth is was closed isolated system
    But it isn't
    "Large external energy source" as you called it is the Sun
    Let's think about this shall we?

    If all of creation is a closed system the what is the energy source? Unless you fancy going down the route of infinite regression you have to logically conclude God.

    Next?

    YIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Second law of thermodynamics could be applies only if
    Earth is was closed isolated system
    But it isn't
    "Large external energy source" as you called it is the Sun
    Last time I checked, I didn't see any extension cords going up to the sun.

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Pim Pendergast View Post
    How do you, as a wiccan, think we got here, then? Do you believe in evolution, even though it's impossible according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics?

    Second law of thermodynamics could be applies only if
    Earth is was closed isolated system
    But it isn't
    "Large external energy source" as you called it is the Sun

    The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium—the state of maximum entropy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pim Pendergast
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Yes they do
    And I fail to see point of this post
    The Sun is that what you call "large external energy source"
    How do you, as a wiccan, think we got here, then? Do you believe in evolution, even though it's impossible according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics?

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Pim Pendergast View Post
    Scientists already know about the sun. Besides, we know that since evolution isn't true, this "large external energy source" doesn't exist.
    Yes they do
    And I fail to see point of this post
    The Sun is that what you call "large external energy source"

    Leave a comment:


  • Pim Pendergast
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by {Anna} View Post
    Maybe Sun
    Scientists already know about the sun. Besides, we know that since evolution isn't true, this "large external energy source" doesn't exist.

    Leave a comment:


  • {Anna}
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Second Law of Thermodynamics could be applies only if Earth is closed system

    Originally posted by Jedediah View Post
    Such a phenomenon (which I might add, is entirely theoretical) would require a large external power source, supplying the earth with huge amounts of energy. If there was such an energy source, one would expect that secular "scientists" would know about it.
    Maybe Sun

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by ToolJob View Post
    I can't tell whether this is just propaganda and you didn't expect anyone think about it or whether you really just don't know. Or if you actually wanted someone to say the answer so you could refute it with "God made the sun, checkmate".

    But anyways..
    Large external power source? The sun.
    Where does the sun's energy come from? Nuclear fusion.
    Who made the sun? No one. Gravity in part.
    Where does gravity come from? Warping of space. No clear answer yet(or if there is, sorry, I don't know about it). This is probably the point that you'd want to start "proving the Bible". However, it still doesn't mean the second law of thermodynamics disproves evolution.

    Hope this helped.
    Oh it helped alright. It helped illustrate just how hellbound you are!

    None of that hogwash you just stained God's favorite forum with amounts to a hill of beans. It's just satanic jibber-jabber.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tool of satan
    replied
    Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

    Originally posted by Jedediah View Post
    Such a phenomenon (which I might add, is entirely theoretical) would require a large external power source, supplying the earth with huge amounts of energy. If there was such an energy source, one would expect that secular "scientists" would know about it.
    I can't tell whether this is just propaganda and you didn't expect anyone think about it or whether you really just don't know. Or if you actually wanted someone to say the answer so you could refute it with "God made the sun, checkmate".

    But anyways..
    Large external power source? The sun.
    Where does the sun's energy come from? Nuclear fusion.
    Who made the sun? No one. Gravity in part.
    Where does gravity come from? Warping of space. No clear answer yet(or if there is, sorry, I don't know about it). This is probably the point that you'd want to start "proving the Bible". However, it still doesn't mean the second law of thermodynamics disproves evolution.

    Hope this helped.

    Leave a comment:

Working...