Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

[Jedediah]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Yet the liebrals will go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to "prove" that the Bible isn't true.

All so they can ignore God's commandments.

It's because of their addiction to sin. Just like a dope addict will think nothing of sticking a knife in your ribs so he can steal your shoes to buy another pack of marihuana cigarettes, liberals don't spare a second thought to committing the most egregious acts of intellectual dishonesty if it will provide cover for them to continue wallowing in sin and depredation. It's sad.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Yet the liebrals will go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to "prove" that the Bible isn't true.

All so they can ignore God's commandments.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

I've lost count of the number of times I've seen science disproving science. There are too many examples to mention but they can never make their minds up. It's like they are just blind to the contradictions in their dogma and just focus on what makes them feel good.

Just today they reckon they've found our common ancestor and it's some sort of rat that ate bugs.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21350900

Yeah, not only do we descend from this ridiculous critter (note it's just a drawing) but so do whales. I can see its little flippers

So first we're all monkeys and now we're all rats. What's next? Fish?

[Jedediah]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Like... the Sun? Also nice for tanning.

Clearly the Second Law of Thermondynamics is too complex for your feeble mind to comprehend. Let the men talk.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Like... the Sun? Also nice for tanning.

And who made the Sun?

Idiot.

YIC

[Dutch Girl]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Such a phenomenon (which I might add, is entirely theoretical) would require a large external power source, supplying the earth with huge amounts of energy. If there was such an energy source, one would expect that secular "scientists" would know about it.

Like... the Sun? Also nice for tanning.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evilution

Quite right Brother Jedediah,

Using their silly scientific notions we should all be moving back to Africa to climb trees, then get gills and go back into the water. If their ideas were right we would all be rocks again by now. They actually do believe that we came from wet rocks .

Humans from rocks? ridiculous. We came from dust.

Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Of course there is a large external power source, supplying the earth with huge amounts of energy, God. He supplies everything we need, it's just that they see Him but they deny Him.

Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.


YIC

Jack

[Jedediah]

One of the most basic scientific principles is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This states that, over time, entropy (disorder) in an environment will increase.

Evilution, on the other hand, argues that we start off simple and, gradually over time, grew more complex. By the Second Law of Thermodynamics, that just isn't possible, since we would be trending toward disorder rather than complexity.

Such a phenomenon (which I might add, is entirely theoretical) would require a large external power source, supplying the earth with huge amounts of energy. If there was such an energy source, one would expect that secular "scientists" would know about it.

Without accounting for an external source of energy, the evilutionist conspiracy falls apart at the seams. Not only does the Bible provide evidence against Darwinist evilution, even secular science confirms that the Bible is true and evilution is false.