X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Father Maurice Lester View Post
    Not one but TWO Mormons in the race and not a Baptwit in sight.

    At least their cult could muster up a viable 'candidate'... you guys can barely elect a dog-catcher let alone a President.

    With any luck we will get another Catholic back in charge and finally get rid of Roe v. Wade.



    Bless you, my hurt in the butt buffoons,
    Father Mo




    .
    Jesus doesn't like Catholics in the White House – in case you didn't notice (and that election was stolen from Godly Richard Nixon by some vote cheating drunken Irish street gang cathylicks in Chicago).

    Bless you, my transubstantiating incense addict.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    I did see some possible good news tonight.

    'Gott' Mit 'Uns' Romney may not have won after all!
    Yes Rodimer, it isn't who votes that matter's it's who counts the vote.

    Leave a comment:


  • Father Maurice Lester
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Not one but TWO Mormons in the race and not a Baptwit in sight.

    At least their cult could muster up a viable 'candidate'... you guys can barely elect a dog-catcher let alone a President.

    With any luck we will get another Catholic back in charge and finally get rid of Roe v. Wade.



    Bless you, my hurt in the butt buffoons,
    Father Mo




    .

    Leave a comment:


  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Father Maurice Lester View Post
    So Baptwits got about what... 0% of the vote?

    How about the Catholic tally... say around 40%?

    Not bad for a predominantly non-Catholic (Hell-bound) bunch of turnip truck drivers!



    Bless you, my Mormon in the White House enablers,
    Father Mo





    .
    More like a muslim in the White House now.

    If you silly papists had not gotten all dressed up in drag and instead wiped them out in the Crusades back in the 11th Century we would not be faced with this dilemma today.


    Bless you too, my pedestrian pope pusher

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    I did see some possible good news tonight.

    'Gott' Mit 'Uns' Romney may not have won after all!

    Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum said he was "not surprised to hear" that the vote total for ex-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney may have been overcounted by 20 in the final tally of Iowa caucus-goers, but both he and his campaign were declining to weigh in on the story that broke Thursday night.

    Speaking to a large gathering of New Hampshire voters at Windham High School, the Pennsylvania Republican said he was unaware that a local television station in Iowa had aired a report on a potential vote count discrepancy that would alter the winner of the caucus two days ago.

    The station, KCCI, reported that in Appanoose County, a vote-counter had discovered an inconsistency between the number of the 50 votes he had monitored and what the Republican Party of Iowa had recorded.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    A lot of Iowans thought that greasy papist wop Santorum was a Christian. That's the problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johny Joe Hold
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Father Maurice Lester View Post
    So Baptwits got about what... 0% of the vote?

    How about the Catholic tally... say around 40%?

    Not bad for a predominantly non-Catholic (Hell-bound) bunch of turnip truck drivers!

    .
    Father Maurice, for once I have to agree. You Catlicks have been stealing Baptists away from us right under our noses here in Iowa.

    I know what you do. You sprinkle tap water on the corn fields. The price of corn goes up, and, the farmers turn Catlick.

    We need to teach these farmers more money can bring new temptations. They need to be Baptists to ward off the powers of Satan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Father Maurice Lester
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    So Baptwits got about what... 0% of the vote?

    How about the Catholic tally... say around 40%?

    Not bad for a predominantly non-Catholic (Hell-bound) bunch of turnip truck drivers!



    Bless you, my Mormon in the White House enablers,
    Father Mo





    .

    Leave a comment:


  • HTannor
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    With all due respect, Brother Cranky, if she had Jesus on her side, why would she have failed so miserably and become such a laughingstock?
    I don't believe she had Jesus on her side. She is, after all, married to a queer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post
    Duh! Michele Bachmann should have won! She has Jesus on her side. I am certain she will become our president somewhere in our future.
    With all due respect, Brother Cranky, if she had Jesus on her side, why would she have failed so miserably and become such a laughingstock?

    Leave a comment:


  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post
    Duh! Michele Bachmann should have won! She has Jesus on her side. I am certain she will become our president somewhere in our future.
    While that is one of the more penetrating observations COM, I'd take Governess Sara Palin over Michele Bachman any day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cranky Old Man
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    Yes, but I noticed that "Other" and "No Preference" got votes, as did Michele Bachmann!
    Duh! Michele Bachmann should have won! She has Jesus on her side. I am certain she will become our president somewhere in our future.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Scopes
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Brother Enoch View Post
    I really can't see Gingrich being backed up by Santorum.
    From a purely scientific and objective point of view the terms "backed up" in regards to these particular individuals is interesting. Thank you for the well reasoned input to this discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • WilliamJenningsBryan
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by Brother Enoch View Post
    I just found out Santorum is a friggin Papist like Gingrich.

    With a name like Santorum I should have guessed. I guess it's Ron Paul for me.
    Praise the sweet Name of the Baby Jesus Brother Enoch, finally I've found someone around here that agrees with me. At first I was willing the give Newt some benefit of the doubt, but let's face it – he has changed religions about as many times as he's changed wives.

    There is no way that Jesus is going to tolerate a cathylick in the White House – you might as well change the address to 666 Pennsylvania Avenue and install the hot lines directly to the Vatican. Let me remind everyone the last time a cathylick was in the White House – it was 1960 when JFK stole the election from Godly Republican Richard Nixon (due to voter fraud in Chicago – the same place Obama is from I might add).

    We've all had to suffer through over 40 years of conspiracy theories when in fact it was Jesus that took care of that little problem.

    I still don't know what to think of Wrong Paul, his lack of commitment to killing mooselimbs bothers me. Then there is still Rick Perry – a Methodist, straight through the lineage from the Anglicants to the cathylicks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Enoch
    replied
    Re: What is WRONG with you Iowans??

    Originally posted by John Scopes View Post
    Were I interested in politics I would have gone and voted for Sperman Cain purely for the entertainment value.

    Considering the genetically recessive traits of evangelical christians the typical American I expect a Santorum-Gingrich ticket this fall.
    I really can't see Gingrich being backed up by Santorum.

    Leave a comment:

Working...