X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dr Laurence Niles
    replied
    Originally posted by toadtanker View Post
    What do they have to defend from children ? Are you all serious ?!
    2 Kings 2:23 And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.

    2 Kings 2:24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.

    Bears, guns: it's all the same to The Lord

    Praise Jesus.
    Posted via Mobile Device

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by toadtanker View Post
    Shooting and killing any unarmed person is unacceptable and wrong. They had no reason nor right to "defend" their property from and unarmed person(s). What do they have to defend from children ? Are you all serious ?!
    That reminds me of one of my favorite action scenes from the pages of the Holy Bible.

    Under God's direction, Moses' army defeats the Midianites. They kill all the adult males, but take the women and children captive. When Moses learns that they left some live, he angrily says: "Have you saved all the women alive? Kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." So they went back and did as Moses (and presumably God) instructed, killing everyone except for the virgins. In this way they got 32,000 virgins --captive girl children virgins! ---- Numbers 31:1-54

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by toadtanker View Post
    Shooting and killing any unarmed person is unacceptable and wrong. They had no reason nor right to "defend" their property from and unarmed person(s). What do they have to defend from children ? Are you all serious ?!
    I would say the thing about you Sir, are you serious when you say someone can force themselves into the privacy of your own home and you can't defend yourself by randomly shooting up the vehicle they are in???

    This is America, we have the Second Amendment.
    Bill of Rights: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

    Leave a comment:


  • toadtanker
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Shooting and killing any unarmed person is unacceptable and wrong. They had no reason nor right to "defend" their property from and unarmed person(s). What do they have to defend from children ? Are you all serious ?!

    Leave a comment:


  • BelieverInGod
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by Max The Cat View Post
    You folks are seriously misinformed about this case. The Coffeys and their companions never set foot on the Muhs property. They were unrinating on the side of a PUBLIC road. They were also shot on public land. Don't take my word for it - look it up for yourself.

    Have you forgotten that a seven-year-old child is dead? Even if they did trespass (Which, as I said, didn't happen, was it worth his life). The Muhs fired blindly into a pitch-black might at two fleeing vehicles. Any novice gun owner knows you don't pull the trigger unless you know what you're shooting at.

    Suppose the Muhs shot one of your children - how many of you would feel justified killing the Muhs in revenge? Think my friends, before you make statements like, "I'd shoot anyone who set foot on my property." You may have to one day.
    My children wouldn't be urinating on a public road, they're not animals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nathan B. Forrest
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by Max The Cat View Post
    You folks are seriously misinformed about this case. The Coffeys and their companions never set foot on the Muhs property. They were unrinating on the side of a PUBLIC road. They were also shot on public land. Don't take my word for it - look it up for yourself.

    Have you forgotten that a seven-year-old child is dead? Even if they did trespass (Which, as I said, didn't happen, was it worth his life). The Muhs fired blindly into a pitch-black might at two fleeing vehicles. Any novice gun owner knows you don't pull the trigger unless you know what you're shooting at.

    Suppose the Muhs shot one of your children - how many of you would feel justified killing the Muhs in revenge? Think my friends, before you make statements like, "I'd shoot anyone who set foot on my property." You may have to one day.
    Hello, and welcome to God's Favorite Forum!

    Please introduce yourself here in the aptly named "Introduction Forum."

    Let us know what church you attend, how you came to find Jesus, your favorite Bible verse... you know, the really important stuff that matters! It's good to meet you, Praise Jesus!

    I hope that we can become friends some day, I'm excited!

    ~ Nate

    Leave a comment:


  • Max The Cat
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    You folks are seriously misinformed about this case. The Coffeys and their companions never set foot on the Muhs property. They were unrinating on the side of a PUBLIC road. They were also shot on public land. Don't take my word for it - look it up for yourself.

    Have you forgotten that a seven-year-old child is dead? Even if they did trespass (Which, as I said, didn't happen, was it worth his life). The Muhs fired blindly into a pitch-black might at two fleeing vehicles. Any novice gun owner knows you don't pull the trigger unless you know what you're shooting at.

    Suppose the Muhs shot one of your children - how many of you would feel justified killing the Muhs in revenge? Think my friends, before you make statements like, "I'd shoot anyone who set foot on my property." You may have to one day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cursed
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by kneelb4me View Post
    Gale and Sheila list of things they did to us as neighbors

    1. Shot are dog when he was tied up for no reason with a 30-30
    2. Shot at my dad when he walked out on his porch
    3. Called the law on us for no reason
    4. Cause me to beat there son up

    They are not good people to be around they are sinners they will never get out in the real world again and for your information I know what happened the truth the kid was not on there property the were across the street which is the government so you people can raise all the money you can but it won't help them they are guilty
    You know I believe in having a gun but not shooting people for no reason you people are the sinners for helping the murderer get over yourself
    Hello, and welcome to God's Favorite Forum!

    Please introduce yourself here in the aptly named "Introduction Forum."

    Let us know what church you attend, how you came to find Jesus, your favorite Bible verse... you know, the really important stuff that matters! It's good to meet you, Praise Jesus!

    I hope that we can become friends some day, I'm excited!

    Leave a comment:


  • kneelb4me
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Gale and Sheila list of things they did to us as neighbors

    1. Shot are dog when he was tied up for no reason with a 30-30
    2. Shot at my dad when he walked out on his porch
    3. Called the law on us for no reason
    4. Cause me to beat there son up

    They are not good people to be around they are sinners they will never get out in the real world again and for your information I know what happened the truth the kid was not on there property the were across the street which is the government so you people can raise all the money you can but it won't help them they are guilty
    You know I believe in having a gun but not shooting people for no reason you people are the sinners for helping the murderer get over yourself

    Leave a comment:


  • Whip of Japheth
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by stavros View Post
    Drunks don´t know what they´re doing.
    We know very well.

    This year will enter the history. For the first time, a civilized nation has a complete weapons control. Our streets will be surer, our more efficient police and the world will follow our example in the future.
    Adolf Hitler

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by stavros View Post
    Drunks don´t know what they´re doing.
    Which makes gunfire not prosecutable if the participants are not able to differentiate between right and wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • stavros
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by Jeb Thurmond View Post
    Arizona has finally legalized concealed guns in bars. Finally!

    After all, my clothes are my private property, and if people fear mutually assured destruction via a bar-brawl-with-bullets, they will be less likely to spill their beer on my private property.

    Mutually Assured Destruction worked during the Cold War, why shouldn't it work in a bar? Remember, we're not talking about arming potheads here, just drunks.
    Drunks don´t know what they´re doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeb Stuart Thurmond
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Arizona has finally legalized concealed guns in bars. Finally!

    After all, my clothes are my private property, and if people fear mutually assured destruction via a bar-brawl-with-bullets, they will be less likely to spill their beer on my private property.

    Mutually Assured Destruction worked during the Cold War, why shouldn't it work in a bar? Remember, we're not talking about arming potheads here, just drunks.

    Leave a comment:


  • MidwestCatLady
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by WilliamJenningsBryan View Post
    If you read and comprehended the article, you would know that the time of the incident was 9:00 PM; i.e. it was dark – those people could have been Al-Qaeda terrorists.

    Sadly this is all due to modern education by the LIEbrals teaching socialism. They were all taught not to respect private property. They think they can just take anyone's property and use it as they please – just like Obama.
    So true. I see it all around me. Children with no respect for others in authority or another's personal property. It is a disgrace. Certainly, this could have been an accident since it was so dark but do not for a moment every underestimate that children can commit acts of violence, crime and sin. Usually, it is the result of poor upbringing by Heathen parents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob the Reviver
    replied
    Re: Texan gun owners persecuted for defending private property

    Originally posted by Jeb Thurmond View Post
    “Trespassers will be shot. Survivers will be reshot!! Smile I will”

    The warning was clear. Yet those sinners decided to keep committing revelery at an hour when Christians are a home asleep.

    Those permissive parents had their son awake past his bedtime. Well, he's finally getting some rest now.

    To donate to the Gale and Sheila Muhs Legal Defense Fund, please send me a PM or and email. Jesus will reward your sacrifice a hundredfold.
    Exactly. If people don't have common sense they should face punishment, whether it is a punch in the face or a gun shot. Why are these two kind souls being charged! They clearly had the correct signs, yet the idiots chose their fate. But the law is in their favor...

    Leave a comment:

Working...