X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Warrior of God
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by Alleen View Post
    "MEET CHRISTIAN SINGLES! (5 Viewing)
    Who knows? The love of your life might be here! All the single men are GODLY and all the single ladies are virgins...........for the most part."

    All the single ladies are virgins for the most part? Just what does that mean.....?

    What are your standards for virginity?


    Bwhahaha, I love this forum.

    There are other circumstances where virginity can be 'restored', or even unsullied.
    Some women do , on occasion , need a corrective, indeed almost punitive experience of the ways they wantonly abuse their own bodies.
    Such a servie by a Gode-fearing man can , MUST , be seen as an act of God's will. It is God smiting the wanton in the very way she is abusing herself and flouting God's will and word. If such corrective use is made of the wanton she can be returned to astate that is, for the most part, virgin status.

    In my years of soldiering round the world I have encountered many faithless women ,who , though taking no payment , were to free with their favours because they had never known God and had always languished under the thrall of some false god-wannabe. Here to the harsh and frequent application of what would otherwise be a Man's base attentions can bring that type of heathen woman whore to a new awakwning in the TRUE GOD... there too she can achieve what is , for the most part, virgin status.

    At times a younger God-fearing woman might be sorely tempted to stray and indulge in ways of the flesh. Here to a punitive application of the very thing she seeks, in ways that would be seen as debased and depraved , might be just the thing to shock her back onto the straight and narrow. There are times when it is God's Will that a Chruchman, or even one such as myself, an experienced layperson who has walked in service of God's wrath , and nows his voice, can apply this educational encounter with salvation.
    God is a knowing and wise man. He is well aware that his Will can be best served in ways where he applies absolution dependent on outcome.

    Thus, when a God-fearing man serves God by offering correctional use of a wayward woman, that is a Godly act, motivated by God , and atracts no stink of sin.
    Similarly, when a straying female is lured towards wanton ways , it is sometimes necessary that she be exposed, at times punitively forced to experience the horrors of wilful wanton depravity , she too can shed sin. The very act of contirition that follows such learning can restore her to near enough virgin status...
    This can also work on Lezzers and the less bull-dykes...but not on homos. They are damned , damned , damned.
    NB...Contrition does not mean that once a week Papist confession shit.

    Hope that helps clear it up...

    Leave a comment:


  • Remy Lebeau
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by JawOfAnAss View Post
    Now I AM embarrassed. I just couldn't see the harm with a little romp in the petunias.

    We are very experienced in detecting code talk, boy! You code word for ravenous outdoor butt sex did not slip through the cracks!!!

    Thanks for setting me straight

    Don't play stupid with us. We know this is in reference to your fully engorged and throbbing 4 inch tallywhacker!!! You disgust me, sinner! You're probably m'ing right now as you read Jenny's posts!!!

    No more hiring those garden girls anymore. I have been standing on the precipice of hell and you grabbed me Sister.
    Sister Jenny has never seen your tallywhacker, much less grabbed it. I'm going to give you this one warning, heathen: DO NOT ATTEMPT TO "CYBER" WITH ANY TRUE CHRISTIAN EVER AGAIN This is not some dirty filth site like Myspace where sexual deviants can come to "hook up" and find the location of the nearest "glory hole".

    Leave a comment:


  • JawOfAnAss
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by JennyD View Post
    Very well. Thank you for being considerate of the weaker-willed visitors we have, who seek Jesus but are still distracted by earthly lusts.

    By the way, Jaw, you ARE aware that the "flowers" referred to in that Scripture are . . . well, they're not something growing in the garden, but rather are the reason a number of Landover's well-heeled ladies spend a week of each month at The Monthly Visitor!
    Now I AM embarrassed. I just couldn't see the harm with a little romp in the petunias.
    Thanks for setting me straight
    No more hiring those garden girls anymore. I have been standing on the precipice of hell and you grabbed me Sister.

    Leave a comment:


  • JennyD
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by JawOfAnAss View Post
    JennyD.
    Forgive me. Lust was the last thing on my mind when I posted the pictures of the young females laboring in the fields of flowers.
    God forbid I should cause a weak man or disgusting lesbo to lust.


    Lev 15:24 And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean.
    Very well. Thank you for being considerate of the weaker-willed visitors we have, who seek Jesus but are still distracted by earthly lusts.

    By the way, Jaw, you ARE aware that the "flowers" referred to in that Scripture are . . . well, they're not something growing in the garden, but rather are the reason a number of Landover's well-heeled ladies spend a week of each month at The Monthly Visitor!

    Leave a comment:


  • SayvedByTheLord
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Well if you ever want to unburden yourself, just click on the link at the bottom of my signature. All communications confidential.

    That goes for everyone.
    Thanks Pastor Zeke. It is inspiring to know you are guiding me in my journey.

    Leave a comment:


  • JawOfAnAss
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by JennyD View Post
    Mr. Ass, that is not appropriate imagery for this forum!

    Please do not post pornography here where gentlemen (and ex-Lezbeans) struggling on their path to reach Jesus may see it!

    Thank you.
    JennyD.
    Forgive me. Lust was the last thing on my mind when I posted the pictures of the young females laboring in the fields of flowers.
    God forbid I should cause a weak man or disgusting lesbo to lust.


    Lev 15:24 And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    I'm guessing it means that, well, not all the single ladies are virgins. Maybe they're widows. Or maybe more happens at bible study than they care to admit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    Far too graphic for this Godly Forum, Pastor Zeke. It was in my past, I have found Jesus.
    Well if you ever want to unburden yourself, just click on the link at the bottom of my signature. All communications confidential.

    That goes for everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • JennyD
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Mr. Ass, that is not appropriate imagery for this forum!

    Please do not post pornography here where gentlemen (and ex-Lezbeans) struggling on their path to reach Jesus may see it!

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vayhr of the Warhost
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    Far too graphic for this Godly Forum, Pastor Zeke. ERRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!!!

    !!!!!FAG ALERT!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • JawOfAnAss
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    I was thinking of the rubber sheets under the regular sheets. No point in ruining a perfectly good mattress.





    Composite Rubber underwear would be most advantageous. Kevlar reinforced for chastity and rubber to keep all that nasty effluent away from Godly men.

    Also works well in the garden.
    Admire these Godly virgins toiling away during their period of uncleanliness.


    Leave a comment:


  • SayvedByTheLord
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    You sound like you have personal experience with this, pal.

    Anything you'd like to share?
    Far too graphic for this Godly Forum, Pastor Zeke. It was in my past, I have found Jesus.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    I was thinking of the rubber sheets under the regular sheets. No point in ruining a perfectly good mattress.

    You sound like you have personal experience with this, pal.

    Anything you'd like to share?

    Leave a comment:


  • SayvedByTheLord
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by Glendora Christianson View Post
    I don't see the point of using rubber sheets. I think an inexpensive white sheet is best. The town's men will likely confiscate the sheet and parade it to the town's square where the decision whether to stone or not stone the bride will be made.
    I was thinking of the rubber sheets under the regular sheets. No point in ruining a perfectly good mattress.

    Leave a comment:


  • Glendora Christianson
    replied
    Re: Virgins for the most part?

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    (Shudder) Should she use rubber sheets Sister Glendie ?
    I don't see the point of using rubber sheets. I think an inexpensive white sheet is best. The town's men will likely confiscate the sheet and parade it to the town's square where the decision whether to stone or not stone the bride will be made.

    Leave a comment:

Working...