[Tingly Bill]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

you would expect donor blood to undergo fairly stringent testing to ensure this does not happen. bare in mind that it is also possible to contract hiv from your mother at birth

hiv is not a punishment for being gay, its thought to have originated from chimpanzees

[BrianAddams]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

My deepest sympathies. But no it is a myth that only gays get HIV. Anyone can get it. You think they'd test the blood donors. Unless your attracted to men you're straight.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

It'll take about as much time as the fanatics on this site to become smart...

Well, aren't you lucid? I take it your Ambilify is kicking in? I suggest doing a few shots to wash it down.

[IllLogicalBunny]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

It'll take about as much time as the fanatics on this site to become smart...

[Nobar King]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

Dumber than bumps on a log...

Do you count how many bumps? Is there a threshold level at which enough log-bumps become smart?

[IllLogicalBunny]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

Dumber than bumps on a log...

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

[...]If God said homosexuality was good ( I mean now, in whatever form you would be believe), would you then believe that you should all be homers?

Absolutely - but He didn't so we don't.

You're slowly getting the idea of Christianity.

[Nobar King]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

No need for that really, it was a genuine question.

We're still trying to get a handle on MDP being a protected class, now (mentally deficient person).

[Steve Macenroe]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

We can see the first-born being slaughtered (which is good when it was done by God, but bad when it was done by Herod)

One rule for one and one for another?

If that is the case and sometimes murder is good, surely sometimes being a 'homer' is good? What about respecting your wife - sometimes good, if God says so?

If God said homosexuality was good ( I mean now, in whatever form you would be believe), would you then believe that you should all be homers?

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

That just isn't true, in the slightest.

Do you completely disagree with any form of scientific reason for the passing on of disease?

I think the real question here is Are You for Real? I can't believe how ignorant and myopic you are!

All it takes is a look at some well-known homolebrities to see the Wrath of God(c) in action.

• Boy George. Led top of the pop charts. Engaged in homosexuality. Got busted for coke possession. Failed career.
• Greg Louganis. Won gold medals at the 1984 and 1988 Olympics for diving. Engaged in homosexuality. Got AIDS. Failed career.
• George Michael. Conquered the Billboard(tm) charts with Wham! and a rising solo career. Won a Grammy(tm) award in 1988. Engaged in homosexuality. Got busted by a cop for soliciting gay sex in a public restroom. Failed career.
• Freddie Mercury. Ruled the rock world. Engaged in homosexuality. God AIDS. Failed career.

And so on, and so on, and so on. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to show that God does not hesitate to punish those who lead themselves astray of His Word(c).

I think some wise slant-eyed chink once said: "Wise men learn from their mistakes. Wiser men learn from other people's mistakes"

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

[...]That just isn't true, in the slightest.

...read on and be enlightened...

Do you completely disagree with any form of scientific reason for the passing on of disease?

Of course not, Biblical epidemiology shows us clearly that the source of all plagues is God. We can see the first-born being slaughtered (which is good when it was done by God, but bad when it was done by Herod) and say, "The death requires a primary position amongst siblings."

Thus, having established the scientific method, we can look at AIDS and see that being a homer leads to AIDS; homers all carry AIDS; homers deceive the ugodly into their lifestyle and thus, viewing homer porn is used to seduce the weak-willed and fashionable and is thus a leading cause of catching AIDS.

Deny it if you can!

[Steve Macenroe]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

You are of limited intellect aren’t you?

No need for that really, it was a genuine question.

Viewing homosexual porn will incur the Wrath of God®. God with then smite you in His Righteous Fury® with AIDS. That is how the internet gives you AIDs.

That just isn't true, in the slightest.

Do you completely disagree with any form of scientific reason for the passing on of disease?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

[…]I have a question then - if you are either commanded or entitled to beat your wives, do you believe that you should do so because that is what God wants, or do you consider that you would suffer in the eyes of the law and hence surely become a sinner?

You are of limited intellect aren’t you? Look at that question – go on, look at it! “suffer in the eyes of the law”? What does that mean? Does it mean, “get arrested”? “surely become a sinner”? I’m not sure that’s right.

Acts 5:29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

• There are some secular laws which are Biblical laws and these must be obeyed – e.g. Thou shalt not steal
• There are some secular laws which are not Biblical Laws and we should try to keep them – e.g. do not drive when drunk
• There are some secular laws which run against Biblical Laws and one should try to keep away from situations where there might be a conflict. Homers should be stoned to death. Here Landover is in the lead for working towards a theocracy so that the Biblical Laws will be the correct ones.
• There are Biblical Laws that are so common sense that you simply keep them – e.g. keeping a woman under control and teaching here right from wrong. A good woman will see that this is right and a man’s duty and thus the law is not involved.

So we thus see that some secular laws would involve sin and others not.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

The 'Word of God' is a registered trademark?? What is 'apologetics free Christianity'?

Apologetics is the nonsense some weak and false Christians put out to compromise with the secularist and pagans who accuse us Christians of being "evil"

That's ridiculous - if that is the case, why are people needing to check if AIDs can be transferred through the internet?? Your argument makes no sense, if someone gets AIDs through sin, why would any form of contact (over the internet or otherwise) cause you to contract the disease?

Viewing homosexual porn will incur the Wrath of God(r). God with then smite you in His Righteous Fury(r) with AIDS. That is how the internet gives you AIDs.

I have a question then - if you are either commanded or entitled to beat your wives, do you believe that you should do so because that is what God wants, or do you consider that you would suffer in the eyes of the law and hence surely become a sinner?

That is the counter argument to beating your wife. God commands us to follow secular low in Hebrews. Until we Christians (with Jesus' help) have this unjust law change we can not beat our wives. Otherwise God would approve of it 100%.

[Steve Macenroe]

Re: Dire question, brothers! I am truly frightened!

The 'Word of God' is a registered trademark?? What is 'apologetics free Christianity'?

That's ridiculous - if that is the case, why are people needing to check if AIDs can be transferred through the internet?? Your argument makes no sense, if someone gets AIDs through sin, why would any form of contact (over the internet or otherwise) cause you to contract the disease?

I have a question then - if you are either commanded or entitled to beat your wives, do you believe that you should do so because that is what God wants, or do you consider that you would suffer in the eyes of the law and hence surely become a sinner?