X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Phebe Carlyle
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    I find it interesting that this scherzo fellow tends to want conflict.

    I asked him a simple question, not actually related to faggotry and he completely and utterly ignored me.

    Perhaps he only wants to deal with the men in the church, knowingly wanting to cause tension and distress! Brothers, take from that what you will!

    You should know though, Mr Scherzo, that yes, whilst I am merely a woman, here in LBC, I am several rungs up the ladder from you, so you ARE to treat me with the utmost respect and if I ask you a question, you WILL surely answer it.

    I await your reply.

    YIC,

    Mrs.P.Wintersnow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    What I want is to say, 'hello' as this is an introduction post. I do not wish to address "free will" at all, but it is pleasant to exercise one's mind in fellowship. How else can I accept correction if not by speaking and asking questions
    Why do I get the feeling that you would accept correction as easily as I would accept Satan at Sunday dinner?

    Leave a comment:


  • scherzo
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by Rubicon View Post
    You are a foul troll and I know what you want. You want to address "free will"?
    What I want is to say, 'hello' as this is an introduction post. I do not wish to address "free will" at all, but it is pleasant to exercise one's mind in fellowship. How else can I accept correction if not by speaking and asking questions

    Leave a comment:


  • Seth Campbell
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by aim for heaven View Post
    Computerand internet will not be found in the Bible, and may I say you are wasting yours and many others time with your inane semantics.
    Very true, and as was pointed out to another one of these trolls, neither is breathing. Better stop that one right away.

    Leave a comment:


  • Seth Campbell
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    no, I do not lend credit by accepting that homosexuals exist as a living being like fish, dogs, or people.

    by creating a term, "homosexual" you have added to God's word too much. Is God's law not good enough for you? Is it not enough to know that men lying with men is an abomination and one should choose not to lye with another? The mythical homosexual is one that does not choose because they act as homosexuals do, just like a cat will act like a cat, or a fish act like a fish. You do not see fish acting like a man do you? A fish that walks on the land and builds a church in which to worship God? I have never seen such a thing.
    So you don't use words that aren't in the Bible. Must be very difficult to discuss things with your mechanic. Oh, and just to let you know, cats aren't mentioned in the Bible either. In fact out of your post the following words are not in the KJV Bible

    - credit
    - creating
    - term
    - lye
    - mythical

    So you may want to be more careful if that is the rules you're going to try and live your life by.

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    post #21 can be found in any dictionary, the only book worth reading is the KJV of the bible. You should account yourself to the loss of time in reading a dictionary, when you should have been reading God's word. it is no wonder you are lost on the path of righteousness. Homosexual is a term found in the dictionary and not in the KJV

    here is a link to the letter 'H' in the King James Concordance



    There is absolutely no word "homosexual" in the Bible, it is a term made up by the leftist government to add special recognition for legislative purposes.
    Computerand internet will not be found in the Bible, and may I say you are wasting yours and many others time with your inane semantics.

    Leave a comment:


  • scherzo
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by aim for heaven View Post
    please see #21 of this thread
    post #21 can be found in any dictionary, the only book worth reading is the KJV of the bible. You should account yourself to the loss of time in reading a dictionary, when you should have been reading God's word. it is no wonder you are lost on the path of righteousness. Homosexual is a term found in the dictionary and not in the KJV

    here is a link to the letter 'H' in the King James Concordance



    There is absolutely no word "homosexual" in the Bible, it is a term made up by the leftist government to add special recognition for legislative purposes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Harold Porter
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    no, I do not lend credit by accepting that homosexuals exist as a living being like fish, dogs, or people.

    by creating a term, "homosexual" you have added to God's word too much. Is God's law not good enough for you? Is it not enough to know that men lying with men is an abomination and one should choose not to lye with another? The mythical homosexual is one that does not choose because they act as homosexuals do, just like a cat will act like a cat, or a fish act like a fish. You do not see fish acting like a man do you? A fish that walks on the land and builds a church in which to worship God? I have never seen such a thing.
    You are a foul troll and I know what you want. You want to address "free will"? More than happy to accomodate you in another thread.

    However, you are perilously close to getting yourself banned here with what you think is a clever approach. You are fooling yourself.

    Have some respect. I've got a simple sermon in my signature that is meant for foul Philistines like you. Take it or leave it. Your choice.

    Yours in Christ!

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    no, I do not lend credit by accepting that homosexuals exist as a living being like fish, dogs, or people.

    by creating a term, "homosexual" you have added to God's word too much. Is God's law not good enough for you? Is it not enough to know that men lying with men is an abomination and one should choose not to lye with another? The mythical homosexual is one that does not choose because they act as homosexuals do, just like a cat will act like a cat, or a fish act like a fish. You do not see fish acting like a man do you? A fish that walks on the land and builds a church in which to worship God? I have never seen such a thing.
    please see #21 of this thread

    It seems that after someone shows you proof positive that you are wrong you will not admit it. If you disregard something so easy to correct as a spelling error it is no wonder you fight so much when someone tries to point out a real error of your ways.

    Leave a comment:


  • scherzo
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    Why should I believe some unsaved faggot over a True Christian™ Man of God?
    You do not need to take my word for it, ask HTannor if he has seen me do it. As a good Christian he will speak the Truth and you can believe his word over mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • scherzo
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by Seth Campbell View Post
    Are you one of those fags that believes their only a fag during the act? That it's some sort of light switch? Because that's the argument I'm hearing.
    no, I do not lend credit by accepting that homosexuals exist as a living being like fish, dogs, or people.

    by creating a term, "homosexual" you have added to God's word too much. Is God's law not good enough for you? Is it not enough to know that men lying with men is an abomination and one should choose not to lye with another? The mythical homosexual is one that does not choose because they act as homosexuals do, just like a cat will act like a cat, or a fish act like a fish. You do not see fish acting like a man do you? A fish that walks on the land and builds a church in which to worship God? I have never seen such a thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • scherzo
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post


    why do you have a photograph of Benny Hinn as your avatar?
    you asked me to change the one I had to less offensive one

    Leave a comment:


  • Seth Campbell
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    Htannor has implied that either I am a homosexual, or my church is

    As I have never nor currently am humping a man, he must be referring that homosexuality is something other than a man humping a man
    Are you one of those fags that believes their only a fag during the act? That it's some sort of light switch? Because that's the argument I'm hearing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phebe Carlyle
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    Originally posted by scherzo View Post
    Show me one homosexual God has created without using the ACT of man lying with another man to establish that man is a homosexual. What physical evidence can you offer me that makes any man a homosexual that is separate from the ACT itself? is there a skin colour, or hair colour, language, eye colour, any one physical feature that establishes that a man is a homosexual?
    Well yes, they tend to lisp a lot and have an eye for fashion.

    I didn't think Benny Hinn is gay as is obvious from his white suits.

    Oh as to your introduction, AFK.. Anglican Fellowship, yes?

    YIC,

    Mrs.P.Wintersnow

    Leave a comment:


  • James Dewitt
    replied
    Re: I had to adopt

    scherzo why have you not told us of your Love for Jesus?
    Jesus died( temporally ) for you, why do you continue to ignore Him? What is the name of your church, I ran AFK through the DoF data base and found no results. Why are you defending the death style of homersexurals, are you one of them?

    Leave a comment:

Working...