well, Evolutionist Science have fact's about mostly things, and that includes that Jesus, really lived 2000 years ago, but god havent existed, never have, as i said, the word " God " is made by man's imagination, so, the man put a character to the word " God " and then it just evolved.
perhaps Jesus made the first bible, and the ten commandments.
Again, this is so much like the Ori in Stargate universe.
well, Evolutionist Science have fact's about mostly things, and that includes that Jesus, really lived 2000 years ago, but god havent existed, never have, as i said, the word " God " is made by man's imagination, so, the man put a character to the word " God " and then it just evolved
You spewing conjecture and half-developed ideas is in no way 'proof'. Surely your beloved 'Evilutionist Science' has published papers on the non-existence of God which offer the empirical evidence you hold so dear?
Of course it's no surprise that an unbeliever would trot out such blasphemy.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. - 1 Corinthians 2:14
See the Bible warned us about your type thousands of years before you were even born!
Is that not proof of the Bible's divine authorship?
No, it's just proof that cowardly men 2 thousand years ago thought ahead to try to falsify any belief that they did not agree with themselves.
The Bible is Man's interpretation. A "spirit" cannot enter someone and speak through them...except maybe in a fantasy novel or a movie...pure fiction.
well, Evolutionist Science have fact's about mostly things, and that includes that Jesus, really lived 2000 years ago, but god havent existed, never have, as i said, the word " God " is made by man's imagination, so, the man put a character to the word " God " and then it just evolved.
perhaps Jesus made the first bible, and the ten commandments.
Again, this is so much like the Ori in Stargate universe.
Wrong. God did not write the Bible. Over-religious zealots wrote what they thought would be agreeable with their god. The Bible is not God himself...it is what Man thinks of God and Christianity.
Analyzing ANY religion is subjective. One needs to pull himself away from such things in order to be fully objective about the matter at hand.
Wrong. God did not write the Bible. Over-religious zealots wrote what they thought would be agreeable with their god. The Bible is not God himself...it is what Man thinks of God and Christianity.
Got any evidence of that?
I have clear eyewitness evidence for what went on. Did you even read my quote? Peter is speaking from personal experience. You, however, are just throwing out prejudice and simply making things up based on feelings in your heart. Find me proof people made up the Bible. Because over and over the evidence stacks against you.
You say the Bible can't be used to prove itself. It doesn't have to. Would you say an affidavit doesn't prove itself and therefore has no value in law? Where else but in the Bible would you expect to find assertions about the reality of God?
Wrong. God did not write the Bible. Over-religious zealots wrote what they thought would be agreeable with their god. The Bible is not God himself...it is what Man thinks of God and Christianity.
Analyzing ANY religion is subjective. One needs to pull himself away from such things in order to be fully objective about the matter at hand.
Of course it's no surprise that an unbeliever would trot out such blasphemy.
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. - 1 Corinthians 2:14
See the Bible warned us about your type thousands of years before you were even born!
Is that not proof of the Bible's divine authorship?
It clearly states in the Bible itself, which comes from God Himself
Wrong. God did not write the Bible. Over-religious zealots wrote what they thought would be agreeable with their god. The Bible is not God himself...it is what Man thinks of God and Christianity.
Analyzing ANY religion is subjective. One needs to pull himself away from such things in order to be fully objective about the matter at hand.
Just like no one (even you) can prove you either go to heaven or hell when you die.
And do not say "it says so in the Bible" because that is DEFINITELY NOT any kind of empirical proof.
But of course it's true because it's in the Bible. What is wrong with you people?
It clearly states in the Bible itself, which comes from God Himself, that everything in it is true and perfect. Where else would you expect to find such a statement?
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2 Peter 1:16-21 16For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17For he received from God the Father honor and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. 18And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount. 19We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto you do well that you take heed, as to a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: 20Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
I really don't see how anyone can turn their backs on such wisdom.
And do not say "it says so in the Bible" because that is DEFINITELY NOT any kind of empirical proof.
As an unrepentant heathen, Mr. Didymus would likely never use the Bible as any sort of evidence or proof. However, empirical or not, the Holy Word of God is all the proof anyone should ever require. For anything.
Once again your grasp of the "correct" language used here is less than adequate but I would advise that you not delve into explaining brain chemistry just yet in this place.
Sit back and observe what goes on from a scientific viewpoint.
Leave a comment: