
Originally posted by Scottish Rachel
View Post
An agnostic beleives there is not enough evidence to decide whether God is real. Is this really a logical position to hold?
There is mountains of evidence that Jesus existed in a non spiritual form in the Bible(KJV1611). This is positive evidence. That fits with secular sciences own rules. But what about evidence that God does NOT exist?
Well here's the thing: by the scientific methodology (look it up on wiki) negative evidence (eveidence that something is not true or proving a negative) is in admissible as evidence if one is using the scientific method.
So where does that leave us? With a mountian of evidence to say Jesus is real but no admissible evidence that God is a fairy tale.
As an agnostic (and following the scientific methodology) where does that leave your decision on Jesus?
God bless.

<--- you
Leave a comment: