X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mrs.Elizabeth
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
    Your daughters look, um, very young for their age.

    I think your parents did a poor job choosing your husband. (I bet it was because it was your mother's choice. That's what happens when the man allows his wife to make a decision). How come your husband allows you to murder your unborn babies every month? Doesn't he know that he's sending you to Hell? You should start making Christian babies ASAP!
    That is a very old photo, they were just babies back then, full of sin and dirty diapers, but now they're very virtous young ladies, and they're in their way to be God fearing Christian wives someday in a near future. And no, my mother didn't choose my husband. You see, my husband father had the idea that he should propose to me in our prom, so he did it and we got married not long after, my parents actually were happy with the decision, because Adam (that's my husband's name by the way) was the perfect Christian husband, and my father knew he will do a good job with my discipline, like he did with me. And don't worry, we're now working in a new baby, we will continue tonight when he come back home. Please pray for us

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr Laurence Niles
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by alex.siegel View Post
    So if masturbation and such are not supposed to be done, then why do our brains tell us to do so, and why does it feel so damn good?
    Why do people rape children?

    Because we are scum.

    That is where Jesus comes in handy.

    God bless.

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    It must have been awful being Eve. There must have been a time when she had consumed the fruit but had not yet given any to Adam.

    And in between then and when God came looking for them. I know that no-one had bothered to give her a name yet (although warthogs and wallabies had been named as we know from Genesis 2) but there she would be in the garden absolutely pouncing with sin with no Adam around or did she trot off into the jungle for a while. I don't want to think what she got up to, Mrs Etheldreda, I would almost cirtainly vomit and then she found Adam and all she could do was pervert him. What a trollop.

    But then, with their "brains" running on sin and before God arrived on the scene the degradation must have been oceanic. Being naked didn't seem to phase them until God turned up and we know that old serpent was on full voltage too, leering at them like a leering thing probably up a tree he probably made sure they ate plenty of toadstools and sweet bosm what a disgusting mess they must have been no wonder they were ashamed Genesis 3. This is from when God arrived:
    GENESIS 3
    8
    And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.
    9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
    10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
    KJV

    No mention of fear or hiding oneself before the arrival of God. Only after the arrival of God. Now I know they made themselves aprons of fig leaves: God says as much. But that was not because they were ashamed. So it can only have been a "brain" idea, a satanic theme soon to nipped in the bud, and Christian marriage is not some orgy of eroticism. Not at all an excuse for Eve's daughters (eventually Adam named her) to revert to form as we all would without the guidance of responsible adults (other than heathens, pagans, animists and witchdoctors with those drinks they make how disgusting can you get) and of The Pastoral Team.

    Because that is not the focus of Christian marriage it should never raise its head at all. Brides who tart themselves are outright strumpets imagine what your husband would think on that first night when you disrobed and he saw that he would be so disappointed.

    Perhaps it would be better if the bride were not even there.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by alex.siegel View Post
    So if masturbation and such are not supposed to be done, then why do our brains tell us to do so, and why does it feel so damn good?
    The short answer: Sin

    The long answer: The LORD created us with free will so we could freely choose to love and obey Him, or freely choose the consequences of rejecting Him. When the serpent tempted Eve with the concept of being higher than God, Eve freely chose sin (Genesis 3:1-24). Since that time, sin has been passed down through all the generations of mankind and we, Adam’s descendants, have inherited sin from him. Romans 5:12 tells us that through Adam sin entered the world, and so death was passed on to all men because "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23). In short, things that go against God's will "feel so damn good" because sin feels good. It's the feeling of ultimate power, but this power is naught but an illusion.

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by alex.siegel View Post
    why do our brains
    Satan controls "brains"
    .–.Jesus is the Answer

    Leave a comment:


  • alex.siegel
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Heathen_Basher View Post
    Personally, I believe there is no reason to do, um, THAT, with a woman unless she's, er, um, excuse the vulgarity here...in that time of the month when she's "ovulating". So, yes, if your honeymoon isn't then, you should hold on. SEX IS FOR REPRODUCTION AND NOTHING ELSE!
    So if masturbation and such are not supposed to be done, then why do our brains tell us to do so, and why does it feel so damn good?

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Mrs.Elizabeth View Post


    I introduce you to my beautiful daughters, we took them this photo in their first birthday in a photographic studio near to our church, the dresses were a gift from my mother. The one of the right is Emily and the other one is her sister Emma. We conceived them in 1996, in august, and they born in 1997, in may. My husband was very serious about we shouldn't have s-e-x until he considered we were ready for children. Of course we don't have s-e-x since the day they were born because he don't want more girls in the house, but since I'm still young we'll try again when they leave after their wedding. If you don't mind, I hope you pray for us to have a beautiful little boy, if that doesn't happen maybe my husband leave me for a woman with the capacity to have a male child, but I wouldn't blame him anyway
    Your daughters look, um, very young for their age.

    I think your parents did a poor job choosing your husband. (I bet it was because it was your mother's choice. That's what happens when the man allows his wife to make a decision). How come your husband allows you to murder your unborn babies every month? Doesn't he know that he's sending you to Hell? You should start making Christian babies ASAP!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs.Elizabeth
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    If you were my wife I'd beat you every day.
    With the due respect I think I must make you a little question about this

    Maybe you're right pastor,
    Can you please point me my mistake? I need lo learn, so I need to know where is the problem in that part, maybe I forget that is "Pastor" and not just "pastor"? I want to be very respectful to you so I need how to write your title well

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Ms.Elizabeth View Post
    Maybe you're right pastor, I'm sorry if my bad grammar ofended you, please feel free to write to my husband's e-mail to let him now about that problem, maybe I just need more discipline

    GodIsMySavior94@hotmail.com (this is the account I borrowed from my husband, so he can know about all the news of this website and he can be sure I'm not in troubles)

    If you were my wife I'd beat you every day.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs.Elizabeth
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    I'm going to be contacting your husband, and asking him to belt you a good one every time you fail to properly capitalize or use decent American grammar. How's that?
    Maybe you're right pastor, I'm sorry if my bad grammar ofended you, please feel free to write to my husband's e-mail to let him now about that problem, maybe I just need more discipline

    GodIsMySavior94@hotmail.com (this is the account I borrowed from my husband, so he can know about all the news of this website and he can be sure I'm not in troubles)

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    I'm going to be contacting your husband, and asking him to belt you a good one every time you fail to properly capitalize or use decent American grammar. How's that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs.Elizabeth
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon



    I introduce you to my beautiful daughters, we took them this photo in their first birthday in a photographic studio near to our church, the dresses were a gift from my mother. The one of the right is Emily and the other one is her sister Emma. We conceived them in 1996, in august, and they born in 1997, in may. My husband was very serious about we shouldn't have s-e-x until he considered we were ready for children. Of course we don't have s-e-x since the day they were born because he don't want more girls in the house, but since I'm still young we'll try again when they leave after their wedding. If you don't mind, I hope you pray for us to have a beautiful little boy, if that doesn't happen maybe my husband leave me for a woman with the capacity to have a male child, but I wouldn't blame him anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Etheldreda
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by tlars699 View Post
    I was merely attempting to point out that our pastor is mistaken about his choice of descriptors, if he wishes to praise effectively.
    You're quite mistaken, friend. Pastor Flint is a True Christian™ pastor, and close, personal friend of Jesus Christ Himself. I fully expect God to bump Elijah off the chariot of fire and send it down to Freehold to escort the good man to Heaven come the day the LORD calls him home. There is practically no man on earth who is closer to the person of Jesus Christ Himself as our own dear pastor. To suggest he is mistaken is to suggest Jesus Christ Himself is mistaken. It's blasphemy, in my own opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • tlars699
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by James Hutchins View Post
    Vanity- it is a sin you know.
    1 Corinthians 15:1-58
    1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
    2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
    3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
    4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
    5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:
    6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep.
    7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles.
    8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time.
    9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
    10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.
    11 Therefore whether it were I or they, so we preach, and so ye believed.
    12 Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead?
    13 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen:
    14 And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
    15 Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not.
    16 For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ raised:
    17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.
    18 Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.
    19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
    20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
    21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
    22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
    23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
    24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
    25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
    26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
    27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
    28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
    29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
    30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour?
    31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.
    32 If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.
    33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.
    34 Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame.
    35 But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come?
    36 Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
    37 And that which thou sowest, thou sowest not that body that shall be, but bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some other grain:
    38 But God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him, and to every seed his own body.
    39 All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
    40 There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another.
    41 There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory.
    42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
    43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
    44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
    45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
    46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
    47 The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.
    48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
    49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
    50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
    51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
    52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
    53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
    54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
    55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?
    56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.
    57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
    58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
    And now you call me vain, for simply pointing out that God's works *are* Holy, and therefore artful, and beautiful upon the eye to behold? Beauty may only be skin deep, but surely Ezekiel's inner beauty doth shine through, as you yourself have mentioned?

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: You don't HAVE to do 'it' on the honeymoon

    Originally posted by tlars699 View Post
    Ah, but "winked" in this case, by God, in absence of association with the word "stud", means something entirely different. In your passage, clearly it means that God 'winked' the 'times of ignorance' away, as if they did not exist, for that is within his power.
    The clear association of the word "stud" in the profile lends the winking of said avatar its lasciviousness. "stud" as you very well know, has a certain unmentionable connotation with which I full disagree, especially concerning his marital status.
    What a filthy, filthy mind.

    A 'stud' is a supporting piece of lumber, used in a wall, to support those above. The kind and gentle Pastor is merely a tool of God used by Him to support and put forth the Love of Jesus.

    Job 15:12
    Why doth thine heart carry thee away? and what do thy eyes wink at,

    What do you think the answer is?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X