Tweet
Which kills more, guns or cartoons? Why Obama's USSA is so violent
During the panic after the Sandy Hook unpleasantness, people were freaking out, so it was not the time to discuss gun control (but was still the perfect time to talk about censorship). Now it's time to move on, (though it's still a good time to talk about censorship).
But Obama refuses to move on, in fact he even thinks we're going to trust him to lower crime. Really? Let's take a look at the murder rates of other nations, compared to Obama's USSA:
United States 5
Norway 0.6
Netherlands 0.93
Germany 0.86
Sweden 0.89
Switzerland 0.71
Denmark 1.01
France 1.31
Japan 1.02
You're five times more likely to be murdered in Obama's USSA than in Japan!
Almost ten Times more likely than in Norway!
In fact, when Obama took power in 2009 the murder rate became the same as in 1964 - the height of the Beatlemania crime wave!
Based on a record like that, can you really trust Obama when he says he's going to deal with crime?
Sure, he says he's only looking at small tweaks like limits on magazine sizes, or more background checks. Doesn't effect most gun owners, right?
Wrong. The slippery-slope to total gun control tyranny is real: let's imagine what would happen if the smallest gun control measures were taken. Let's say, background checks to stop the insane from getting machine-guns. What would happen if Adam Lanza had to settle for a shotgun?
First, the lower body count at Sandy Hook would mean less fears of gun-toting crazies, which is why people buy guns and ammo. Also, since Obama's election, fears of gun control have been a major reason for gun and ammo sales. Less fear means less sales, which means less money for the NRA, and therefore less money for Republican politicians.
So, in short, the NRA and Republican politicians have a vested interest in more school shootings. We get paid every time a 6-year-old gets shot.
I know it's brutal to think that we're basically in the dead-kid industry, but when you consider the consequences when the Dems win an election, the ends really do justify the means. On average, each dead kid is worth several million in campaign contributions, and I'd say that's worth it.
But let's continue to ponder what would happen if the gun control movement continues. Worst case scenario, we might end up with a gun control regime like Japans:
The only thing worse than gun control is bullet control. This tyrannical form of oppression is used in Switzerland, and also Japan:
So as you can imagine, Japan is a land of tyranny and violence. Think it's just a coincidence that North Korea is right next to Japan?
But overall, it's best to stay on the offensive. That means stop talking about guns and talk more about the real real reason America is more violent than other wealthy countries: because America, and only America, has violent media.
Just look at some of the insane violence that American children - and only American children - are watching. As baby-boomers, our generation grew up thinking cartoon violence meant Bugs Bunny dropping an anvil on someone. Well, get ready for a shock as you see what this generation of children is watching:
There seems to be a lot of swearing also, but since they're using some kind of urban slang ebonics thing I literally can't figure out a word they're saying.
While the British only watch teletubbies, American kids are watching this:
While the Japanese are watching Sailor Moon, and Astro-Boy, American kids are watching this:
While Canadian kids are watching their igloos melt, American kids are watching this:
Illegal crimmigrant anchor babies watch this one:
Any surprise that there's so much violence in Obama's USSA?
But Obama refuses to move on, in fact he even thinks we're going to trust him to lower crime. Really? Let's take a look at the murder rates of other nations, compared to Obama's USSA:
United States 5
Norway 0.6
Netherlands 0.93
Germany 0.86
Sweden 0.89
Switzerland 0.71
Denmark 1.01
France 1.31
Japan 1.02
You're five times more likely to be murdered in Obama's USSA than in Japan!
Almost ten Times more likely than in Norway!
In fact, when Obama took power in 2009 the murder rate became the same as in 1964 - the height of the Beatlemania crime wave!
Based on a record like that, can you really trust Obama when he says he's going to deal with crime?
Sure, he says he's only looking at small tweaks like limits on magazine sizes, or more background checks. Doesn't effect most gun owners, right?
Wrong. The slippery-slope to total gun control tyranny is real: let's imagine what would happen if the smallest gun control measures were taken. Let's say, background checks to stop the insane from getting machine-guns. What would happen if Adam Lanza had to settle for a shotgun?
First, the lower body count at Sandy Hook would mean less fears of gun-toting crazies, which is why people buy guns and ammo. Also, since Obama's election, fears of gun control have been a major reason for gun and ammo sales. Less fear means less sales, which means less money for the NRA, and therefore less money for Republican politicians.
So, in short, the NRA and Republican politicians have a vested interest in more school shootings. We get paid every time a 6-year-old gets shot.
I know it's brutal to think that we're basically in the dead-kid industry, but when you consider the consequences when the Dems win an election, the ends really do justify the means. On average, each dead kid is worth several million in campaign contributions, and I'd say that's worth it.
But let's continue to ponder what would happen if the gun control movement continues. Worst case scenario, we might end up with a gun control regime like Japans:
It's almost impossible to get to a gun in Japan, and selling one or owning one is a serious crime. Fire the gun? Possibly life imprisonment. Gun-control laws are taken so seriously that police will pursue a violator all the way to the grave — and maybe beyond...
"You have to bring your rifle in every year for inspection. You have to pass a drug test. You can't have a criminal record. A doctor has to certify you're mentally and physically healthy. You have to actually go to the firing range and show that you can use the weapon. If you have any sort of issue, we're going to take away your firearms," Detective X said.
"Sometimes, police officers even go to the neighborhoods where a gun owner lives and interview neighbors to make sure the owner isn't causing problems or having issues with his spouse,"…"
"You have to bring your rifle in every year for inspection. You have to pass a drug test. You can't have a criminal record. A doctor has to certify you're mentally and physically healthy. You have to actually go to the firing range and show that you can use the weapon. If you have any sort of issue, we're going to take away your firearms," Detective X said.
"Sometimes, police officers even go to the neighborhoods where a gun owner lives and interview neighbors to make sure the owner isn't causing problems or having issues with his spouse,"…"
The only thing worse than gun control is bullet control. This tyrannical form of oppression is used in Switzerland, and also Japan:
"The police are not given a free hand in using guns either. Internal controls make it very difficult for a gun or even a single bullet to fall into the hands of criminals.
"When we go to the firing range, we get an allotted number of bullets, Detective X said. "When we're done firing, we collect the shells and return the gun. If one shell is missing, the police station goes into a panic."
"…officer on duty used his gun to kill himself…He was charged posthumously to publicly show that even the dead can't get away with breaking the firearms laws..."
"When we go to the firing range, we get an allotted number of bullets, Detective X said. "When we're done firing, we collect the shells and return the gun. If one shell is missing, the police station goes into a panic."
"…officer on duty used his gun to kill himself…He was charged posthumously to publicly show that even the dead can't get away with breaking the firearms laws..."
So as you can imagine, Japan is a land of tyranny and violence. Think it's just a coincidence that North Korea is right next to Japan?
But overall, it's best to stay on the offensive. That means stop talking about guns and talk more about the real real reason America is more violent than other wealthy countries: because America, and only America, has violent media.
Just look at some of the insane violence that American children - and only American children - are watching. As baby-boomers, our generation grew up thinking cartoon violence meant Bugs Bunny dropping an anvil on someone. Well, get ready for a shock as you see what this generation of children is watching:
There seems to be a lot of swearing also, but since they're using some kind of urban slang ebonics thing I literally can't figure out a word they're saying.
While the British only watch teletubbies, American kids are watching this:
While the Japanese are watching Sailor Moon, and Astro-Boy, American kids are watching this:
While Canadian kids are watching their igloos melt, American kids are watching this:
Illegal crimmigrant anchor babies watch this one:
Any surprise that there's so much violence in Obama's USSA?
Comment