peanut butters prove that evilution not true

[Petal]

next times i see a athiest i gonna slaps them wiv a fish an ram a peanut butter sanwich in thier evil mouths, yay!

[Talitha]

Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

With all this abundance of proof, I'm surprised these Scientists still have the cheek to carry on lying to us.
God Created everything. You cannot get something from nothing.

Petal, did you know that God hides a Baby Bunny in every Peanut?

Here is the proof:

[Petal]

Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

Petal, did you know that God hides a Baby Bunny in every Peanut?

them peanut baby bunnys be so bootiful, Miss.Talitha! they be proofs that lord God create everythang. i gonna gets some peanuts rite nows an finds them bunnys an then i gonna puts them wiv my peanut baby Jesus, they gonna watch over him

[Aristotle]

Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

next times i see a athiest i gonna slaps them wiv a fish an ram a peanut butter sanwich in thier evil mouths, yay!

Why would evolution caused a plant to grow something that can so easily be turned into peanut butter? If the evilutionists were right, the peanut would be either poisonous or too hard to make into butter. GOD obviously designed the plant to help American parents make sandwiches for their children.

[Aristotle]

follow on video

I found this follow-on video providing even more evidence

[AllieM]

Re: follow on video

Abiogenesis and the BBT are NOT evolution. If you are going to "disprove" something, please know the basics of which you are attempting to disprove. Thank you.

It's embarrassing that people feel qualified to debate evolution, yet need this explained.

[Paper_Cut]

Re: follow on video

Find me a jar of peanut butter that is over a billion years old and attempt to make your case. This argument shows just how little you understand about evolution. You cannot possibly hope to "disprove it" without first understanding it.

Fact is evolution isn't a set theory. Every day it adapts to new evidence. Despite overwhelming evidence against a passage written thousands of years ago who still hadn't discovered micro-organisms you fail to adapt or give way.

So, go ahead and continue to stick your head in the sand; we need someone to laugh at.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: follow on video

Find me a jar of peanut butter that is over a billion years old and attempt to make your case. This argument shows just how little you understand about evolution. You cannot possibly hope to "disprove it" without first understanding it.

Ha! You ramble on with nonsense like "a billion years" and then try to mock us?!? If you had ANY grasp of REAL science, you'd know that a billion years is impossible because the world is only between 6000-10,000 years old!

[Talitha]

Re: follow on video

Find me a jar of peanut butter that is over a billion years old and attempt to make your case. This argument shows just how little you understand about evolution. You cannot possibly hope to "disprove it" without first understanding it.

Fact is evolution isn't a set theory. Every day it adapts to new evidence. Despite overwhelming evidence against a passage written thousands of years ago who still hadn't discovered micro-organisms you fail to adapt or give way.

So, go ahead and continue to stick your head in the sand; we need someone to laugh at.

Now you're just being silly.
I just looked in the Larder and even the Peanut Butter at the back was only out of date by 3 years.
How can ANYTHING be a Billion years old when the Earth is only 6000 years?

[Paper_Cut]

Re: follow on video

Ha! You ramble on with nonsense like "a billion years" and then try to mock us?!? If you had ANY grasp of REAL science, you'd know that a billion years is impossible because the world is only between 6000-10,000 years old!

Oh? If you'd like to split that hair, can you prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Earth is only 6-10 thousand years old?

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: follow on video

Oh? If you'd like to split that hair, can you prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Earth is only 6-10 thousand years old?

http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers#/topic/young-age-evidence

Cased closed, God-mocker!

[James Hutchins]

Re: follow on video

........................Fact is evolution isn't a set theory. Every day it adapts ...............................
So, go ahead and continue to stick your head in the sand; we need someone to laugh at.

Sure, change it every day to suit. Right.....
What ever occurred in the past is history, fact. Case closed It cannot be modified on a daily basis. Are you really that incredibly stupid? Creationism never changes. It states how and why and that is that.

The laughing you hear is people laughing at you. They cover their faces because it is rude to laugh directly at someone. Sorry, it was uncontrollable.

[Paper_Cut]

Re: follow on video

Now you're just being silly.
I just looked in the Larder and even the Peanut Butter at the back was only out of date by 3 years.
How can ANYTHING be a Billion years old when the Earth is only 6000 years?

The formation of life required oxygen, there isn't any oxygen in a sealed bottle of peanut butter.

[Paper_Cut]

Re: follow on video

Sure, change it every day to suit. Right.....
What ever occurred in the past is history, fact. Case closed It cannot be modified on a daily basis. Are you really that incredibly stupid? Creationism never changes. It states how and why and that is that.

The laughing you hear is people laughing at you. They cover their faces because it is rude to laugh directly at someone. Sorry, it was uncontrollable.

Every day new evidence comes in, the inability to adapt to this information would make evolutionists as close minded as you are.

[James Hutchins]

Re: follow on video

The formation of life required oxygen, there isn't any oxygen in a sealed bottle of peanut butter.

Of course there is. Everything has O2 in it.

Oh I get it, you are a kidder. Well, you got me. Very funny.

But please, make your future posts serious ones, we are not here to play kiddie games.