Re: Does the Sun Even Emit Light?
I have been thinking about this, and looking at some of the source material.
Sister Lycia's comments have been very accurate, consistent (they are quoting and reflecting upon God's Word after all) and, as always, illuminating.
Additionally, Sister Adilene made this perceptive post:
JAMES 1:11 For the Sunne is no sooner risen with a burning heate, but it withereth the grasse; and the flowre thereof falleth, and the grace of the fashion of it perisheth: so also shall the rich man fade away in his wayes. ©1611
The focus of this text is "the rich man" relating/identifying the sun's having risen in such a way that we are to think of the rich man as having (similarly) risen (to his current status) - the high temperature associated with the sun could also be a burning wind BUT in the sense of its burning/withering property (as opposed to its "blowing").
In a way this is similar to the postulated "solar wind" of meagre "science" - but it is not the same.
The fading away of our rich man is associated with his rising to his estate, but is not the same as his estate. The contitions which produce his fading are akin to the conditions which accompany the sun's rising and which produce withering of vegetation, but are not a part of the sun any more than the equivalent conditions are a part of the rich man's wealth.
It would be possible to write the sentence (James 1:11) with the "rich man" bit first, but it would be a clumsy solution and James' elegant original stands in striking harmony with Moses' revelation in Genesis: altogether quite beautiful!
Originally posted by Lycia The Repentant
View Post
Sister Lycia's comments have been very accurate, consistent (they are quoting and reflecting upon God's Word after all) and, as always, illuminating.
Additionally, Sister Adilene made this perceptive post:
I'm probably wrong, but perhaps he meant light, like from candles? fire?
The focus of this text is "the rich man" relating/identifying the sun's having risen in such a way that we are to think of the rich man as having (similarly) risen (to his current status) - the high temperature associated with the sun could also be a burning wind BUT in the sense of its burning/withering property (as opposed to its "blowing").
In a way this is similar to the postulated "solar wind" of meagre "science" - but it is not the same.
The fading away of our rich man is associated with his rising to his estate, but is not the same as his estate. The contitions which produce his fading are akin to the conditions which accompany the sun's rising and which produce withering of vegetation, but are not a part of the sun any more than the equivalent conditions are a part of the rich man's wealth.
It would be possible to write the sentence (James 1:11) with the "rich man" bit first, but it would be a clumsy solution and James' elegant original stands in striking harmony with Moses' revelation in Genesis: altogether quite beautiful!
Comment