Tweet
It's time for another installment of Pope Watch - we chew the gristle coming from the Vatican so you don't have to.
Lost in the MSM's fawning over vacuous socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the obvious answer - head on down to Venezuela for that shithole experience. As usual, commie Cortez prefers the infantile response of preferring to pee and defecate where she stands to share the shithole experience with the rest of us.
Now the cathylicks have some bull dyke lezbean nuns complaining about the lack of career advancement opportunities to which the obvious should apply, head on over to the Church of England or your local Anglican't franchise - they have wafers too, and some say the music is better.
Now where is that "rainbow" love amongst the LGBTQ "community" - where lezbean nuns realize that the "clericalism" is none other than the "patriarchy" of the homers that run the Vatican? So far there are no reports of priests wanting to become nuns, but that's probably due to the fact that there's not enough soy in those "gluten free" wafers yet. Meanwhile, the makers of "pussy hats" are having second thoughts while realizing that there are some "women" that have tallywhackers.
No one at the NFL kneels for Jesus - turn off the TV, fall is coming and it's time to lay in a supply of popcorn for the winter.
Lost in the MSM's fawning over vacuous socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the obvious answer - head on down to Venezuela for that shithole experience. As usual, commie Cortez prefers the infantile response of preferring to pee and defecate where she stands to share the shithole experience with the rest of us.
Now the cathylicks have some bull dyke lezbean nuns complaining about the lack of career advancement opportunities to which the obvious should apply, head on over to the Church of England or your local Anglican't franchise - they have wafers too, and some say the music is better.
Now where is that "rainbow" love amongst the LGBTQ "community" - where lezbean nuns realize that the "clericalism" is none other than the "patriarchy" of the homers that run the Vatican? So far there are no reports of priests wanting to become nuns, but that's probably due to the fact that there's not enough soy in those "gluten free" wafers yet. Meanwhile, the makers of "pussy hats" are having second thoughts while realizing that there are some "women" that have tallywhackers.
No one at the NFL kneels for Jesus - turn off the TV, fall is coming and it's time to lay in a supply of popcorn for the winter.
Popcorn Moment! James Keenan, SJ, and his 8 women cardinals!
Posted on 8 September 2018 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
At Fishwrap(*), which is ever devolving into the delusions they have fomented over the years, you can read about the devious Jesuit promoter of sodomy – I know, I know – James Keenan. Weigel’s notes on Keenan’s antics are helpful.
Keenan penned a patently sycophantic piece about making women cardinals. He provides eight candidates!
After you stop laughing, take a look at his list. It’s a hoot. You’ll laugh until you stop!
Included among The Keenan 8™ are the likes – I promise I am not making this up – of the heretical Srs. Elizabeth Johnson and Margaret Farley.
Margaret, whose work was censured by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, is a promoter of masturbation and same-sex activity. In her censured book, she wrote: “My own view, as should be clear by now, is that same-sex relationships and activities can be justified according to the same sexual ethic as heterosexual relationships and activities.” Yep. Let’s make her a Cardinal.
Sr. Mary Ann Hinsdale is a colleague of Keenan at Jesuit BC, so that’s not at all self-serving. She is a great admirer of the late ex-priest homosexual Gregory Baum (so venerated by certain of Team Francis).
Sr. Mary Catherine Hilkert is one of the 16 signers of the ultra-feminist Mandeleva Statement calling for an end to patriarchalism in the Church and acceptance of homosexuality. I’m sensing a theme.
Sr. Theresa Forcades, a darling of the wymyn who want ordination and, it seems, carnal knowledge of other women, is feted at the site of the Conference for the … no no… WOC: Women’s Ordination Conference for her “queer theology”. She is against capitalism and, in an interview, said: “I do call my church structurally misogynist. It’s not just a couple of priests here and there or a particular bunch of cardinals. The whole structure needs to be undone. Fully. Because it’s based on clericalism, and clericalism is based on ordination, and only males can be ordained and access the places where decisions are made. I find this completely sinful.” Yeah… she should be one of Keenan’s cardinals, too.
And there is, of course, our old pal and promoter of women’s ordination Phyllis Zagano!
No, really.
That’s enough for now. You can do your own digging. What do you want to bet a certain theme keeps coming up in their work.
Now that I think about it…
A dominating criterion for Keenan’s list seems to be along the lines of ex-Card. McCarrick’s proclivities. Is that the Jesuit standard for making someone a cardinal?
Inquiring minds want to know.
At his octogenarian level, perhaps Keenan could be forgiven for some of his crazy notions. After all! But, then again, I know some really sharp nonagenarians.
No. I think he really means it.
Notions, by the way, are what these heterodox Jesuits and Fishwrappers generally proffer.
Notions are found in sewing baskets, not in serious discourse.
Amusing as this all is, I find it deeply tacky to issue it on the Feast of the Nativity of Mary.
Posted on 8 September 2018 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
At Fishwrap(*), which is ever devolving into the delusions they have fomented over the years, you can read about the devious Jesuit promoter of sodomy – I know, I know – James Keenan. Weigel’s notes on Keenan’s antics are helpful.
Keenan penned a patently sycophantic piece about making women cardinals. He provides eight candidates!
After you stop laughing, take a look at his list. It’s a hoot. You’ll laugh until you stop!
Included among The Keenan 8™ are the likes – I promise I am not making this up – of the heretical Srs. Elizabeth Johnson and Margaret Farley.
Margaret, whose work was censured by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, is a promoter of masturbation and same-sex activity. In her censured book, she wrote: “My own view, as should be clear by now, is that same-sex relationships and activities can be justified according to the same sexual ethic as heterosexual relationships and activities.” Yep. Let’s make her a Cardinal.
Sr. Mary Ann Hinsdale is a colleague of Keenan at Jesuit BC, so that’s not at all self-serving. She is a great admirer of the late ex-priest homosexual Gregory Baum (so venerated by certain of Team Francis).
Sr. Mary Catherine Hilkert is one of the 16 signers of the ultra-feminist Mandeleva Statement calling for an end to patriarchalism in the Church and acceptance of homosexuality. I’m sensing a theme.
Sr. Theresa Forcades, a darling of the wymyn who want ordination and, it seems, carnal knowledge of other women, is feted at the site of the Conference for the … no no… WOC: Women’s Ordination Conference for her “queer theology”. She is against capitalism and, in an interview, said: “I do call my church structurally misogynist. It’s not just a couple of priests here and there or a particular bunch of cardinals. The whole structure needs to be undone. Fully. Because it’s based on clericalism, and clericalism is based on ordination, and only males can be ordained and access the places where decisions are made. I find this completely sinful.” Yeah… she should be one of Keenan’s cardinals, too.
And there is, of course, our old pal and promoter of women’s ordination Phyllis Zagano!
No, really.
That’s enough for now. You can do your own digging. What do you want to bet a certain theme keeps coming up in their work.
Now that I think about it…
A dominating criterion for Keenan’s list seems to be along the lines of ex-Card. McCarrick’s proclivities. Is that the Jesuit standard for making someone a cardinal?
Inquiring minds want to know.
At his octogenarian level, perhaps Keenan could be forgiven for some of his crazy notions. After all! But, then again, I know some really sharp nonagenarians.
No. I think he really means it.
Notions, by the way, are what these heterodox Jesuits and Fishwrappers generally proffer.
Notions are found in sewing baskets, not in serious discourse.
Amusing as this all is, I find it deeply tacky to issue it on the Feast of the Nativity of Mary.
(*)Fishwrap
If we want to reform the church, let's make women cardinals
Sep 8, 2018
by James Keenan
In the reforms being mentioned in light of the contemporary crisis in the Catholic Church, I see lots of punitive proposals but I don't see enough constructive models of empowerment.
I believe that until women have power in the church, we will not be reformed.
By power, I don't think making women deacons is much of a step; I think making them cardinals is.
During the June 2017 consistory, the new Swedish Cardinal Anders Arborelius suggested the pope consider creating a special advisory body of women akin to the College of Cardinals to offer more opportunity for women's leadership in the church.
Acknowledging in an NCR interview that "the role of women is very, very important in society, in economics," Arborelius added, "In the church sometimes we are a bit behind."
He said that the advisory body "could be made more official": "We have a College of Cardinals, but we could have a college of women who could give advice to the pope."
When I heard that, I thought of the conversation a few years ago about making women cardinals. I prefer that earlier proposal. Having a women's advisory council, as the Swedish cardinal suggests, reminds me of the claims of "separate but equal" — a claim that never becomes true. A women's advisory council would inevitably be secondary if women were excluded from the College of Cardinals
It was only a hundred years ago that canon law decreed that cardinals had to be ordained. Before that, the College of Cardinals was made up of both ordained and lay men.
As I understand it, the then-"new" 1917 Code of Canon Law was looking for a way of curbing abuses in the making of cardinals. Some men had little knowledge of theology and others were, well, very young.
. . . .
If we want to reform the church, let's make women cardinals
Sep 8, 2018
by James Keenan
In the reforms being mentioned in light of the contemporary crisis in the Catholic Church, I see lots of punitive proposals but I don't see enough constructive models of empowerment.
I believe that until women have power in the church, we will not be reformed.
By power, I don't think making women deacons is much of a step; I think making them cardinals is.
During the June 2017 consistory, the new Swedish Cardinal Anders Arborelius suggested the pope consider creating a special advisory body of women akin to the College of Cardinals to offer more opportunity for women's leadership in the church.
Acknowledging in an NCR interview that "the role of women is very, very important in society, in economics," Arborelius added, "In the church sometimes we are a bit behind."
He said that the advisory body "could be made more official": "We have a College of Cardinals, but we could have a college of women who could give advice to the pope."
When I heard that, I thought of the conversation a few years ago about making women cardinals. I prefer that earlier proposal. Having a women's advisory council, as the Swedish cardinal suggests, reminds me of the claims of "separate but equal" — a claim that never becomes true. A women's advisory council would inevitably be secondary if women were excluded from the College of Cardinals
It was only a hundred years ago that canon law decreed that cardinals had to be ordained. Before that, the College of Cardinals was made up of both ordained and lay men.
As I understand it, the then-"new" 1917 Code of Canon Law was looking for a way of curbing abuses in the making of cardinals. Some men had little knowledge of theology and others were, well, very young.
. . . .
Comment