Tweet
No, it's not our "Mueller" (the one that looks like Lurch "your rang" from the Addams Family) - the cathylicks have their own "Müller" in the person of Cardinal Gerhard Müller. Both share a common attribute - they are squirming around like a bunch of wet ferrets in a fuse box.
What Cardinal Müller is complaining about is Francis' latest embracing of Amazon rain forest savages as a model to transform the Vatican church into a more "universal" religion. Evidently Francis has never visited California where he can choose any number of models for a "new age" religion - everything from Oprah Winfrey to bulimic yoga weight loss cults.
With Jeffrey Epstein in jail, you would think that Francis would be looking to add underage girls to the world's longest running and largest sodomy cult, but his Marxist Jesuits now have their eyes set on communism.
I'm surprised that Francis' Jesuits haven't attacked him for Amazon "cultural appropriation". With more than enough abstruseness for one day, we conclude another installment of Pope Watch.
What Cardinal Müller is complaining about is Francis' latest embracing of Amazon rain forest savages as a model to transform the Vatican church into a more "universal" religion. Evidently Francis has never visited California where he can choose any number of models for a "new age" religion - everything from Oprah Winfrey to bulimic yoga weight loss cults.
With Jeffrey Epstein in jail, you would think that Francis would be looking to add underage girls to the world's longest running and largest sodomy cult, but his Marxist Jesuits now have their eyes set on communism.
I'm surprised that Francis' Jesuits haven't attacked him for Amazon "cultural appropriation". With more than enough abstruseness for one day, we conclude another installment of Pope Watch.
Cardinal Müller Exposes Amazon-Party Ideology
en.news - Jul 16
The main problem of the Amazon Instrumentum Laboris (IL) are unclear and overused key terms, Cardinal Gerhard Müller writes in a July 16 statement.
He names slogans like “synodal,” “integral development,” “Samaritan missionary,” “open Church,” “a Church reaching out,” “Church of the Poor,” “Church of the Amazon.”
Müller analyses that the IL replaces the Bible and the Tradition with “self-referential” circling around the latest Francis documents. The Amazon is considered a “particular source of God's Revelation.” Müller calls this a “false teaching.”
The IL immunizes itself by calling objections “doctrinalism,” “dogmatism,” “ritualism,” clericalism,” “thinking of the pharisees”, and “pride of reason”.
Instead, it proposes “cosmovision,” “theologia indigena”, and an “eco-theology.” Müller calls it “a brainchild of social romantics.”
It turns incarnation into "inculturation," by abusing a quotation, wrongly attributed to Irenaeus of Lyon.
The IL claims that cultural diversity calls for a "more robust" incarnation in order to embrace "different ways of life and cultures.” (IL 113). Müller calls this “completely abstruse."
en.news - Jul 16
The main problem of the Amazon Instrumentum Laboris (IL) are unclear and overused key terms, Cardinal Gerhard Müller writes in a July 16 statement.
He names slogans like “synodal,” “integral development,” “Samaritan missionary,” “open Church,” “a Church reaching out,” “Church of the Poor,” “Church of the Amazon.”
Müller analyses that the IL replaces the Bible and the Tradition with “self-referential” circling around the latest Francis documents. The Amazon is considered a “particular source of God's Revelation.” Müller calls this a “false teaching.”
The IL immunizes itself by calling objections “doctrinalism,” “dogmatism,” “ritualism,” clericalism,” “thinking of the pharisees”, and “pride of reason”.
Instead, it proposes “cosmovision,” “theologia indigena”, and an “eco-theology.” Müller calls it “a brainchild of social romantics.”
It turns incarnation into "inculturation," by abusing a quotation, wrongly attributed to Irenaeus of Lyon.
The IL claims that cultural diversity calls for a "more robust" incarnation in order to embrace "different ways of life and cultures.” (IL 113). Müller calls this “completely abstruse."
Comment