X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dennis Lukes
    Innkeeper for Christ
    True Christian™
    • Dec 2018
    • 2376

    #1

    The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

    Brothers and sisters in Christ, the other day I was viewing a military documentary with my youngest boy, Kenny. He told me that he'd heard America had never lost a war, and was confused because he thought we lost in Vietnam. I told him that we DID win in Vietnam, but the liberals and hippies stabbed us in the back in Washington. Then I gave him a taste of the rod (Proverbs 13:24, Proverbs 26:3), made him recite the Pledge of Allegiance, and sent him off to read his Bible.

    Is this what they're teaching our children in school? That we're a bunch of sissy losers? The has NEVER lost a war. EVER. Okay, the War of 1812 was basically a draw, and half of the country lost the Civil War, and the Korean War didn't really work out as planned, and Vietnam wasn't as successful as it should've been, and the Iraq War sort of opened up a power vacuum that led to the rise of ISIS, and the War in Afghanistan is still dragging on with no end in sight (thanks Obama), but we've NEVER lost a war. This got me to thinking that, to really emphasize this unassailable fact, we need to go back and finish the job. I'm going to lay out the case for re-invading Vietnam.


    1. They're still communists
    Vietnam is a one-party state, and that party is the Communist Party of Vietnam. We invaded that gook-infested jungle in the first place to root out the commies, and we succeeded in killing hundreds of thousands of them. However, we didn't get ALL of them. Like fleas, the ones that survived kept multiplying until they were back in full force.


    2. They kill babies for fun
    Infanticide has been legal in Vietnam since the 1960s. In fact, they have one of the highest abortion rates in the world. 40% of all gook babies are murdered in the womb. Some of those infant souls might have found Christ and been saved. Not likely, but possible.


    3. They eat dogs
    "Oh, that's just a stereotype you racist, it's not true!" Well then why did the gook government have to step in and tell the people to stop eating dogs because they were getting rabies from it?


    4. They have no respect for their betters
    The gooks are insubordinate little cretins. They need to be reminded of their place. America is #1. Vietnam shouldn't even crack the top 80.


    5. We have Republicans in power
    Who were the primary architects of the Vietnam War, you ask? President John F. Kennedy (Democrat), President Lyndon Johnson (Democrat), Defense Secretary Robert McNamara (Democrat), Secretary of State Dean Rusk (Democrat), General William Westmoreland (Republican, but he let Democrats tell him what to do), President Richard Nixon (RINO), and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger (Jewish "Republican" Zionist). If you're wondering why we lost, look no further. Democrats are limp-wristed cowards who can't fight in wars, let alone win them. With The Donald and whoever his best and brightest happen to be at that particular moment at the helm, the gooks wouldn't stand a chance.


    6. They are heathens who deny Christ and worship Satan
    There is no evidence of a single in the entire nation of Vietnam. About three quarters of the little yellow monkeys practice paganism. 12% or so are Buddhists. 7% of gooks are Mary-hailing papists who quite literally lick cats as they devour them for supper. God wants us to exterminate heathens (Deuteronomy 2:33-34, Deuteronomy 7:1-3, Numbers 33:51-52, Romans 6:23, 2 Thessalonians 1:8). Let's take Vietnam for Christ!


    7. Vengeance
    Romans 12:19 says "Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord." Jesus has been waiting over 40 years for revenge. How much longer must we keep Him waiting before we wipe the smirks off their little gook faces and send them to Hell?



    8. We won't make the same mistakes as last time
    We won practically every single military engagement of the Vietnam War. Even their beloved Tet Offensive was ultimately ineffective militarily. No, the war was lost at home. It was the hippies, the negroes, the feminists, the college professors, the rock musicians, the Jews, the socialists, the draft dodgers who spat in the faces of our troops, who marched and picketed, who worked for the Comintern to make us lose. Well, we won't let it happen again. I propose a two-front war, one force invading Vietnam and the other to be deployed against troublemakers and subversives on our own soil. Make war, not love! This is what Jesus would want (Matthew 10:34-36).


    There you have it. 8 solid, undebatable reasons for us to reinvade Vietnam. I've sent this proposal to my congressional representatives as well as directly to the White House. I pray that Donald will add this to his reelection campaign in 2020. We're Making America Great Again. Vietnam has never been great, or even good... but it could be.


    I was sinking deep in sin far from the peaceful shore,
    Very deeply stained within, sinking to rise no more;
    But the Master of the Sea heard my despairing cry,
    From the waters lifted me, now safe am I!
  • Johny Joe Hold
    Mayor of Freehold
     
    • Feb 2010
    • 12294

    #2
    Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

    Good idea, Brother Lukes.

    I've read that today Vietnam is full of business and deals. Maybe there is a way President Trump could simply pay the government there to issue a proclamation the U.S. won the war. The President could cut a ribbon in front of a sign, UNITED STATES EAST.

    This President is great at making deals. Why not one to win the Vietnam War?
    Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

    Comment

    • Phil Ander
      True Christian™
      True Christian™
      • Jan 2016
      • 626

      #3
      Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

      Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post

      This President is great at making deals. Why not one to win the Vietnam War?

      I call it the bone spur effect. Just imagine what the world would be like now if a couple of small osseous abnormalities had not forced the military to decline Donald's earnest desire for service. The number of deferments that were forced upon him only go to highlight his determination to serve.


      Had Donald been allowed to serve, the excellent military training at New York Military Academy would have served America well. Wise beyond his years the young Trump would not doubt have been rapidly promoted and would have the ear of the generals and the politicians of the day.


      The course of war would have been changed forever, and America would have prevailed. The traitor Jane Fonda would have been jailed or executed rather than flashing her well worn bits in "fitness" videos and there would be a truth commission to expose the moral degenerates who opposed the war. Ho Chi Minh city would be Richard M Nixon city.


      Sadly this did come to pass. It could have easily been, if not for a couple of bone spurs.
      58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD; 59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. 61 Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the LORD bringk upon thee, until thou be destroyed.


      Deuteronomy 28: 58- 61

      Comment

      • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
        True Christian™ Lady Extraordinaire, an Honorary Male Biblicist
         
        • Jul 2014
        • 8356

        #4
        Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

        I remember when I was a small child hearing my father explaining the Vietnam war to my brothers. His explanation of the less-than-100% desirable outcome was the USA's unfortunate choice of allies, specifically Australia and New Zealand. The Austrian is not noted for his fighting prowess (this was already known, see also Gallipoli), ditto the New Zilnder, and, gooks aside, they formed the US's only support.

        Next time around we need to get more white folks on board.
        Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!

        Comment

        • Johny Joe Hold
          Mayor of Freehold
           
          • Feb 2010
          • 12294

          #5
          Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

          Originally posted by Phil Ander View Post
          The number of deferments that were forced upon him only go to highlight his determination to serve.

          The course of war would have been changed forever, and America would have prevailed.
          So true. I envision there will be statues of President Trump in every park and town square in the U.S. in a few years. It would have been so fitting if he were holding an M1 rifle and wearing a helmet. But, that opportunity was taken from him by doctors back then.
          Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

          Comment

          • Phil Ander
            True Christian™
            True Christian™
            • Jan 2016
            • 626

            #6
            Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

            Originally posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey View Post
            I remember when I was a small child hearing my father explaining the Vietnam war to my brothers. His explanation of the less-than-100% desirable outcome was the USA's unfortunate choice of allies, specifically Australia and New Zealand. The Austrian is not noted for his fighting prowess (this was already known, see also Gallipoli), ditto the New Zilnder, and, gooks aside, they formed the US's only support.

            Next time around we need to get more white folks on board.

            Is your father still alive? He seems a wise man. If not alive, I hope he is in Heaven. I never understood why the Austrians tried to invade Gallipoli which was in Turkey which was part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Why would you invade yourself unless its some sort of tax scheme?


            I would welcome a fireside chat (NOT a reference to Hell) with your father about Vietnam and Gallipoli.


            Cheers


            Phil
            58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD; 59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. 61 Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the LORD bringk upon thee, until thou be destroyed.


            Deuteronomy 28: 58- 61

            Comment

            • Dennis Lukes
              Innkeeper for Christ
              True Christian™
              • Dec 2018
              • 2376

              #7
              Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

              Originally posted by Johny Joe Hold View Post
              So true. I envision there will be statues of President Trump in every park and town square in the U.S. in a few years. It would have been so fitting if he were holding an M1 rifle and wearing a helmet. But, that opportunity was taken from him by doctors back then.
              We can only hope. Most sculptors are fruity leftists. San Francisco is so far the only city to have built statues commerating Trump, and they are immensely disrespectful (WARNING DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK!!!) He deserves so much better. Not just statues, but cities and counties renamed in his honor. Perhaps if he takes Vietnam, it could be admitted to the Union as the State of East Trumpia.
              I was sinking deep in sin far from the peaceful shore,
              Very deeply stained within, sinking to rise no more;
              But the Master of the Sea heard my despairing cry,
              From the waters lifted me, now safe am I!

              Comment

              • James Hutchins
                True Christian™
                Just a Regular Nice Guy
                 
                • Jun 2009
                • 29433

                #8
                Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

                I have to say, the gooks (or slants, I cannot tell them apart) do a great job getting the stains out of my white shirts and Church Robes(r). So I'd hate to see them wiped off the face of the Earth. I know our Pastor Ezekiel has spent many a sweaty monsoon season there, trying to tech the budding young men Christianity and how to give to Jesus and gain an approving smile from Him.
                I suggest a summit the Pastor Ezekiel and President Trump. The two True Leaders(tm) of the Free World(c) are the ones that, along with the invisible Hand of God(tm) guiding them, determine the fate of these horrific people.

                Carpet bomb and clean the place. Put in a JesusLand(c) and some hotels. I am sure FreeMarketFred knows some people he could put the LBC elders in touch with to arrange financing. Along with a good, over night hand laundry or two.
                Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
                Amos 3:6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?
                Numbers 21:6 And the LORD sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died.
                Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
                Matthew 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
                Matthew 10:36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

                Comment

                • Joanna Lytton-Vasey
                  True Christian™ Lady Extraordinaire, an Honorary Male Biblicist
                   
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 8356

                  #9
                  Re: The Case for Re-invading Vietnam

                  Originally posted by Phil Ander View Post
                  Is your father still alive? He seems a wise man. If not alive, I hope he is in Heaven.
                  Well I hope he's still alive - the children are planning to stay with my parents over the summer. He was alive when I called him an hour or so ago. He's only 63.

                  Originally posted by Phil Ander View Post
                  I would welcome a fireside chat (NOT a reference to Hell) with your father about Vietnam and Gallipoli.
                  Daddy's very interested in your tax-dodge theory. I've sent you a PM with his number, so you can call him and arrange to drop by next time you're in Freehold. They're at the old Keach property. (Mom says feel free to bring the wife and kids.)
                  Vaccinated by the love of Jesus!!!

                  Comment

                  Working...