X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shol'va
    Unsaved trash
     
    • Feb 2007
    • 39

    #1

    Biblical Archaeology: can it be trusted?

    I'd like to know if most of the finds produced by Biblical archaeology so far confirm the stories in the Old and New Testaments? Is Biblical archaeology a worthwhile pursuit, or is most of the "evidence" actually faked, by satanists?
  • Talitha
    Deaconess
    Gracious, genteel, kind, tender, and warm True Christian™ Sister
    True Christian™
    • May 2026
    • 15118

    #2
    Re: Biblical Archaeology: can it be trusted?

    Originally posted by shol'va View Post
    I'd like to know if most of the finds produced by Biblical archaeology so far confirm the stories in the Old and New Testaments? Is Biblical archaeology a worthwhile pursuit, or is most of the "evidence" actually faked, by satanists?
    Well, The Holy Bible(KJV1611) is enough proof for me.

    If God allows someone to find some stone or document to further that proof then all the better.

    If Satanists are involved then God will punish them on Judgement day.

    Sister Talitha

    Markswoman, Circumcisionist, Platinum Tither.


    HE took the damsel by the hand, and said unto her, Talitha Cumi; which is,
    being interpreted, Damsel, I say unto thee, arise!...Mark 5:41



    Comment

    • Rev. Dr. Davidson
      Forum Member
      Forum Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 1439

      #3
      Re: Biblical Archaeology: can it be trusted?

      Most of the 'finds' are speculation. They 'think' they've found this or that.

      They think they've found Babylon, they think they've found Sodom, and the list goes on. Some of it turns up interesting things. So, it's not ALL wrong, but everything should be checked against other sources.
      "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. . . . And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the manservant's do."
      (Leviticus 21:6-7)

      Comment

      • shol'va
        Unsaved trash
         
        • Feb 2007
        • 39

        #4
        Re: Biblical Archaeology: can it be trusted?

        Originally posted by Rev. Dr. Davidson View Post
        Most of the 'finds' are speculation. They 'think' they've found this or that.

        They think they've found Babylon, they think they've found Sodom, and the list goes on. Some of it turns up interesting things. So, it's not ALL wrong, but everything should be checked against other sources.
        I agree. I've seen all these Satan-inspired archaeology documentaries, and the "evidence" they put foward for this city being that Biblical location is rather dubious.

        Comment

        • Rev. Dr. Davidson
          Forum Member
          Forum Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 1439

          #5
          Re: Biblical Archaeology: can it be trusted?

          Originally posted by shol'va View Post
          I agree. I've seen all these Satan-inspired archaeology documentaries, and the "evidence" they put foward for this city being that Biblical location is rather dubious.
          So true... Road signs aren't a recent thing. Granted, only prominent cities had them in acient cultures, but you'd figure there were some somewhere. Something like "15 leagues to Babylon" shouldn't be that hard to find. It's interesting that they can figure out the acient names of Egyptian cities, but are vague when searching in the Middle East. Misinformation works better for them I guess. If 'no one' is sure, Mooslims and Joos can keep Christians in the dark.
          "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. . . . And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the manservant's do."
          (Leviticus 21:6-7)

          Comment

          Working...