Originally posted by Elmer G. White
View Post
Originally posted by keseos
View Post

Actually. It doesn't. By now you might have realized that to defend secular science you should be familiar with it, not just trust your fallible mind to produce good data.
From the atheist viewpoint, astronomy, the expansion of the Universe is not based on changing asterisms. The stars that you see (again, according to the secular explanation) all belong to the local group of stars called the Milky Way Galaxy. The movement of these stars within the Milky Way Galaxy does not require any expansion of the whole universe. The circumnavigation of stars on their paths around the galaxy is adequate.
Expansion of the Universe has been justified based on the red shift. In addition, the velocity of their recession is directly proportional to the distance of the galaxy from us. This is called the Hubble law named after a secular philosopher. To debate science in a proficient manner you should study it. To debate religion in a proficient manner you should study it, too. It seems that you world view is based on your subjective interpretations of some scattered data that you have been able not to miss. Are you willing to take the risk of education, putting your preconceptions to the test in an unbiased manner?
Ephesians 4:18
Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
Yours in Christ,
Elmer

Leave a comment: