Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Point is, this book uses science and evidence to tell us that what you people believe is complete outdated rubbish.
^___^
Have a nice day.
X
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View PostSick? What's sick is the idea that God gives people horrible birth defects for no reason at all -- your idea. God is love; He would never harm one of His children unless that child or its ancestors had committed grievous sins against Him.
What's sick is the idea that God would inflict birth defects, period. Birth defects are sometimes genetic accidents, sometimes the result of toxins one or both of the parents were exposed to. They are not punishments from God, and they are certainly not the result of sins committed by a fetus.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Sick? What's sick is the idea that God gives people horrible birth defects for no reason at all -- your idea. God is love; He would never harm one of His children unless that child or its ancestors had committed grievous sins against Him.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View PostThe same way it could sin anywhere else: by playing with its naughty parts (Onanism), cursing or mocking God, having lustful or blasphemous thoughts, et cetera. Or its ancestors could have been exceptionally wicked or even unsaved, which would also justify such punishment.
And you people call ME sick.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
The same way it could sin anywhere else: by playing with its naughty parts (Onanism), cursing or mocking God, having lustful or blasphemous thoughts, et cetera. Or its ancestors could have been exceptionally wicked or even unsaved, which would also justify such punishment.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View PostWhat's your point? That baby obviously committed terrible sins in the womb and reaped the consequences. I'd say that's the definition of normal.
How could a baby sin in the womb?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
What's your point? That baby obviously committed terrible sins in the womb and reaped the consequences. I'd say that's the definition of normal.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
I wasn't even thinking about homosexuality. You, on the other hand, seem to be obsessed with it.Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View PostIf God made it, it's normal.
So babies born with only half a skull and no brain are normal?
This is anencephaly. This condition occurs when there is failure of formation of the fetal cranial vault. The brain cannot form properly when exposed to amniotic fluid. Note that this fetus died in utero--there are signs of maceration, with skin slippage and reddening.
And to to forestall your obvious reply, homosexuals choose their immoral lifestyle. The duck didn't choose to have four legs.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
If God made it, it's normal.
And to to forestall your obvious reply, homosexuals choose their immoral lifestyle. The duck didn't choose to have four legs.
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Originally posted by Sister Talitha View PostOK Lets stop playing with you Heathens.
Leviticus 11: 20-23 (King James Bible)
All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you. Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;
Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.
But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.
.AMEN.
Fowl are birds, no? Name one bird that goes about on all fours. Birds(fowl) don't have four feet, they have two, and they certainly don't walk on their wings.
Locusts and beetles have six legs, not four. There are no four-footed flyers.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
We were talking about people. Unless you hippies now claim that "bacteria are people too", then you have still failed to prove that anyone else was alive before Adam and Eve. Good luck trying.Originally posted by Peter View PostThe bacteria.
No matter how politely you ask, no-one here is going to rape you.Originally posted by G-Baby View PostForce me..
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
Where?Originally posted by Peter View PostActually it says that pi is 3.
Semantics.Grasshoppers don't have arms, but legs.
Bacteria aren't people, you blithering Dutch idiot. Nor are they mentioned in the Bible.The bacteria.Last edited by Virginia Day Templeton; 06-16-2007, 09:16 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Disgusting atheistic drivel -- in book form!
OK Lets stop playing with you Heathens.
Leviticus 11: 20-23 (King James Bible)
All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you. Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;
Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.
But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.
.AMEN.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: