3 million year old nigra?

[Andreas]

Originally posted by: JonFish85:

1) There was nothing
2) Nothing exploded into something.
3) There was a big pool or mud.
4) The mud decided to grow hands and legs and hair and become a monkey / negro.
5) The monkey / negro one day fell out of a tree, dropped off its hair, turned white, started walking, talking and dancing?

I thought you said you know science.

Scientist don't believe what you wrote.

When one talks about stupidity of evolution, one must speak the truth

I trust only Jesus and God. No one else!

[Andreas]

So you are saying, Mrs Van Bellows, that 6 BILLION years of evilution produced........you? That is the evidence you present FOR evilution?

I don't think scientist believe life started 6 billion years ago.

The Eart itself, theysay, is 4,55 billion years old .

I trust only Jesus and God

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Look, the fact is that no one knows FOR SURE what happened way back when.

But out of all the theories, speculations and guesswork going on about it, evolution is one that actually makes sense!

So you are saying, Mrs Van Bellows, that 6 BILLION years of evilution produced........you? That is the evidence you present FOR evilution?

[Remy Lebeau]

Look, the fact is that no one knows FOR SURE what happened way back when.

But out of all the theories, speculations and guesswork going on about it, evolution is one that actually makes sense!

Can you read?

1.) There are no transitionary fossils
Toss the fossil record out. It DOES NOT support evilution

DARWIN'S BIGGEST PROBLEM, "...innumerable transitional forms must have existed but why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth? ...why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this perhaps is the greatest objection which can be urged against my theory". Origin of the Species.

2.) No dating method that has been proven accurate
Dating processes are far from infallible and are based on three arbitrary assumptions (a constant rate of decay, an isolated system in which no parent or daughter element can be added or lost, and a known amount of the daughter element present initially.) Examples: For CO2, the decay must be constant and the abundance of O2 must be known accurately. There must have been no incorporation of Carbon into the mineral at the time of crystallization or a leak of Carbon from the mineral following crystallization. The system must have remained closed for both O2 and Carbon since the time of crystallization. The relationship between the data obtained and a specific event must be known. Apply this to any compound psuedo-scientist wish to use for a dating method. Dating methods are actually THEORHETICAL in nature.

3.) So-called "prehumans" are still alive today(example:aborigines/neanderthals)
Not just prehumans, but many other lifeforms. They are called living fossils.

The Coelacanth, horseshoe crab, cockroach, okapi, crocodile, lungfish, sturgeon, mackerel, freshwater bass, herring, needlefish, lobster, crawfish, sharks, jellyfish, sponges, frogs, bees, ants, butterflies, termites, dragonflies, salamanders, arachnids, millipedes, and neanderthals to name a few.

4.) No mutation has ever been observed to promote positive changes(only cancer, retards, conjoined twins, etc)
There is no evidence whatsoever which would conclude that ANY CREATURE ALIVE would EVER transform into another unique species

Stephen J. Gould, Harvard , "Every paleontologist knows that most species don't change. That's bothersome....brings terrible distress. ....They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they remain the same species and that's not due to imperfection and gaps but stasis. And yet this remarkable stasis has generally been ignored as no data. If they don't change, its not evolution so you don't talk about it." Lecture at Hobart & William Smith College, 14/2/1980.

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world. ...just as the peculiar behavior of light forced physicists to conclude that Newton's laws were incomplete, so the Cambrian explosion has caused experts to wonder if the twin Darwinian imperatives of genetic variation and natural selection provide an adequate framework for understanding evolution..." Time Magazine, 12/4, 1995, p.67, 74

So tell me, Van Hellbound, how exactly does evilution make the most sense considering there is no evidence whatsoever to support it? There is just as much evidence for evilution as there is for the giant spagetti monster who lives in Ireland.

[Dr. Ernest C. Ville, D.C.S.]

Look, the fact is that no one knows FOR SURE what happened way back when.

But out of all the theories, speculations and guesswork going on about it, evolution is one that actually makes sense!

Evilution makes sense? So you believe that:

1) There was nothing
2) Nothing exploded into something.
3) There was a big pool or mud.
4) The mud decided to grow hands and legs and hair and become a monkey / negro.
5) The monkey / negro one day fell out of a tree, dropped off its hair, turned white, started walking, talking and dancing?



How stupid can you get? I am a scientist and work closely with others in the scientifical world. I can conclusively state that evilution is a fact...... A fact proving that "scientists" just sit around and play "mad libs" with huge numbers (10 million, no 10 biiiiillion, no a zillion!) and put on pasty glasses and pretend to be authoritative. They are just regular folks, folks who hate God and will burn forever for their lies.

Fortunately, I stick closely with the Holy Word of God (KJV 1611, of course). Its teachings are infallible -- not ONE word in it has been proven wrong in the two thousand plus years since it was written. Science is ALWAYS wrong -- every time someone else comes along, they add 10 million to a date. They must think we're all crazy and retarded! Unfortunately, you have shown that you are by believing this negra-dung. Enjoy hell.

[SalvationSeeker]

Look, the fact is that no one knows FOR SURE what happened way back when.

JESUS knows!
And He has told us through His holy word, the KJV1611.

You'd rather trust a sickular scientist than Jesus, who was actually there?
How stupid can you get?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Look, the fact is that no one knows FOR SURE what happened way back when.

But out of all the theories, speculations and guesswork going on about it, evolution is one that actually makes sense!

[Brother_Mike]

He doubts evilution because there are no transitionary fossils
No dating method that has been proven accurate
So-called "prehumans" are still alive today(example:aborigines/neanderthals)
No mutation has ever been observed to promote positive changes(only cancer, retards, conjoined twins, etc)
And evilution is not supported by the Holy Bible KJV 1611

I've already defeated you on this subject in the old forum you silly woman. Why are you still supporting this monkey worship crap in the face of your utter defeat?

Preach it Brother! I gave you reps for that post! Show the monkey-people who's in charge!

[Remy Lebeau]

You see this, Zekey, yet you still doubt evolution?

It's like you're looking at the blue sky yelling 'it's green! It's green!'

He doubts evilution because there are no transitionary fossils
No dating method that has been proven accurate
So-called "prehumans" are still alive today(example:aborigines/neanderthals)
No mutation has ever been observed to promote positive changes(only cancer, retards, conjoined twins, etc)
And evilution is not supported by the Holy Bible KJV 1611

I've already defeated you on this subject in the old forum you silly woman. Why are you still supporting this monkey worship crap in the face of your utter defeat?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

You see this, Zekey, yet you still doubt evolution?

It's like you're looking at the blue sky yelling 'it's green! It's green!'

If the Holy Bible says that the sky is green, then by Christ it is! But of course, God's Holy Word never makes such ridiculous claims. Only you and your monkey-worshippers would try and force the public to believe that a monkey skull could be 3 billion years old, when the Bible clearly tells us that the earth is around 6,000 years old. How crazy can you get?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

You see this, Zekey, yet you still doubt evolution?

It's like you're looking at the blue sky yelling 'it's green! It's green!'

[MoonFlower]

Why in the world would they name a skeleton...and name it SATAN??!!! Was it THAT ugly?!

Moon

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Well, secular monkey-worshiping scientists are at it again. They have dug up a monkey skull from behind an old nigra shack and say they've found "proof" of their already discredited theory of evilution. Read the whole ridiculous story HERE.

LONDON (Reuters) - A 3.3 million-year-old skeleton of the earliest child ever found shows the ancient ancestor of modern humans walked upright but may also have climbed trees, scientists said on Wednesday.

They found the well-preserved remains of a three-year-old girl of the species Australopithecus afarensis -- which includes the fossil skeleton known as "Lucy" -- in the Dikika area of Ethiopia, 400 kms northeast of the capital Addis Ababa.

"It represents the earliest and most complete partial skeleton of a child ever found in the history of paeleoanthropology," said Dr Zeresenay Alemseged, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

The skull, torso and upper and lower limbs, including the hand, show both human and ape-like features. The state of the ancient bones suggest she was buried in a flood which may also have caused her death.

The remains provide the first evidence of what babies of early human ancestors looked like. The nearly complete skeleton will also provide information about the child's height and structure.

But some of the features from the upper part of the body, including the shoulder blade and arms are more ape-like. The fingers are long and curved which suggest she might have been able to swing through trees.

"The finding is the most complete hominid skeleton ever found in the world," Zeresenay Alemseged, who is head of the Paleoanthropological Research Team, told a news conference in Addis Ababa.

He said the fossil was older than the 3.2-million-year-old remains of "Lucy" discovered in 1974 and described by scientists as one of the world's greatest archaeological finds.

"The new bones belong to a three-year-old girl who lived 3.3 million years ago, 150,000 years before Lucy," Zeresenay said.

The fossil has been named "Selam," which means satan in Ethiopia's official Amharic "language".

JUVENILE "LUCY"

Dr Simon Underdown of Oxford Brookes University in England described it as a massively exciting discovery of a juvenile "Lucy." "This tremendous fossil will make us challenge many of the ideas we have about how and why we came to walk on two feet," he said.

Well, I can answer that for you buddy. We White folks walk upright because God created us in His image. I suppose nigras walk upright, sort of, because they've been copying us for 5,000 years or so.

That old skull was probably just the remains of some nigra's supper from last winter. You know they'll eat anything they can catch over there in the jungles, and it is a fact that AIDS got started by some spear chuckers in africa having sex with monkey brains....This whole thing is just more craziness from jews who will find any excuse to spit on Jesus.