The story of humans unravels
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion...s-1783865.html
Most of the article is technical and total garbage, so skim it or not as your stomach allows. The main point is that the monkey worshippers can't keep their facts straight, and their dogma implodes every time they find a new bone. This time is the skulls of retards from Soviet Georgia. The skull size is 40% smaller than from normal Caucasians, so they might be from Hamites instead, though who knows how they would get there. They could be from Oriental midgets too, for that matter.
Anyway, the point is that the tiny retard skulls are in a place where they "shouldn't" be, so instead of the "out of Africa" model now the Darwinists are working on a new "out of Africa and into Europe and then back to Africa and then out again" theory. And they are serious about it too.
The big lesson from this? Flood their websites with posts and mock them over this new find. They will still try to spin it as "millions of years old", but just reply that if they got this wrong, then why should we believe anything else they say.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion...s-1783865.html
Most of the article is technical and total garbage, so skim it or not as your stomach allows. The main point is that the monkey worshippers can't keep their facts straight, and their dogma implodes every time they find a new bone. This time is the skulls of retards from Soviet Georgia. The skull size is 40% smaller than from normal Caucasians, so they might be from Hamites instead, though who knows how they would get there. They could be from Oriental midgets too, for that matter.
Anyway, the point is that the tiny retard skulls are in a place where they "shouldn't" be, so instead of the "out of Africa" model now the Darwinists are working on a new "out of Africa and into Europe and then back to Africa and then out again" theory. And they are serious about it too.
The big lesson from this? Flood their websites with posts and mock them over this new find. They will still try to spin it as "millions of years old", but just reply that if they got this wrong, then why should we believe anything else they say.
