[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Thank you Pastor, that was resounding, simply resounding. A further point to crush this vile heretic:

All scientist claim that science is observable, repeatable and measurable.

• We can observe God’s Creation all around us.
• He is omnipotent so He could repeat it absolutely any time he wanted.
• We can measure the Years of Creation by reference to the Genealogies in the Old Testament and then simply add the present year. (6,004 years since creation)

Creation is a science. QED

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Is that why they call it a "Theory"? Yet the Bible is God's Law!

AMEN!!! Shout GLORY!!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Evolution is proven [...]

Is that why they call it a "Theory"? Yet the Bible is God's Law!

[ClarificatiOnDarwin]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Evolution is proven whereas most of the bible cannot be proven.

[Bryan Tamariki]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Secular science is a group of theories (not 'facts') made up by men. The Bible is the Word of God. I choose to believe the Bible.

[ClarificatiOnDarwin]

Re: Can you call creation science?

That's not true and you know it. That video is from a kitty website that shows cats doing cute things. Please take this forum seriously.

[Aristotle]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Um...no not really. The watermark in the bottom is from a funny site with cat pictures. As for cats evolving from scorpions. Scorpions fall under the arachnid species, while cats fall under the mammal species. Cats could have never evolved from scorpions. As for God's leftover parts, He really must be all knowing to put parts from a different species into another animal, only to have the animal still be a mammal.

Haven't you followed all that eviloutionist propaganda. According to them, there was nothing but these weird looking scorpion and cockroachy things in the Cambrian and some of them scorpions turned into cats and dogs and other animals while the cockroachy critters (trilobytes I think they were called) just stayed as cockroaches.

I know it sounds as believable as Santa Claus but that's what these evilotionists believe.

[GiveMeStrength]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Science is a lie, the only truth is the Bible!

[NCOH]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Um...no not really. The watermark in the bottom is from a funny site with cat pictures. As for cats evolving from scorpions. Scorpions fall under the arachnid species, while cats fall under the mammal species. Cats could have never evolved from scorpions. As for God's leftover parts, He really must be all knowing to put parts from a different species into another animal, only to have the animal still be a mammal.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Evolutionists are pointing to this video, saying it proves cats evolved from scorpions:

All the video proves is that God had some leftover scorpion parts, which he used when He invented cats.

[Aristotle]

Thank you, Brother Bathfire

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Just to show the fallen nature of Man, I had read the Bible through a dozen times and missed the importance of 1Timothy 6:20 each time. Thank you, Brother Bathfire, for correcting my error. Don't you love the way Paul put down those snooty scientists?

Now, I know there are those fallen Christians who think that Paul didn't write 1 Timothy or the other Pastorals. However, they weren't there, so how do they know? Personally, I would rather believe in the Bible than some babbling self-proclaimed expert.

[virginWhore]

Re: Can you call creation science?

wow i think i just discovered something. I got out on google on the word science, and I found this.

science c.1300, "knowledge (of something) acquired by study," also "a particular branch of knowledge," from O.Fr. science, from L. scientia "knowledge," from sciens (gen. scientis), prp. of scire "to know," probably originally "to separate one thing from another, to distinguish," related to scindere "to cut, divide," from PIE base *skei- (cf. Gk. skhizein "to split, rend, cleave," Goth. skaidan, O.E. sceadan "to divide, separate;" see shed (v.)).

So science is the act of dividing, or creating division. Thats what satan does, isnt it? God brings us together and satan divides us.

so do i really have to look any further than satan?


also, does anyone really think that the creation didn't happen? well were here, right.

vw

[Jeremiah Abernathy]

Re: Can you call creation science?

I prefer the term "Creation Truth" myself.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Can you call creation science?

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

[Pastor Nereu Gargalo]

Re: Can you call creation science?

Can you?

I got into a debate with my high school science teacher and he said that you cannot call creation science.

THANK YOU!

We do not call it science, we call it TRUTH! We here at Landover are the personification of Truth, Righteousness, Goodness, Honesty and Fact! That Landover Baptist exists is PROOF that Jesus watches over us.

6: And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,

7: Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.


All those who know His Love know this:
1st John 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

These scientist types are just trying to squirm out of our Lord Jesus Christ's inevitable grip. Just as that fog headed simpleton Bertrand Russell wanted to say "Not enough proof God, not enough proof." I bet he tried it and is now bathing nicely in the LAKE OF FIRE!

I exist, therefore Jesus Christ exists.
PRAISE!