X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peter
    replied
    Re: science = truth

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    I don't think she can help it Pastor.

    She has been Brainwashed by Science and I expect she didn't go anywhere near a good Christian School to learn some hard facts.
    The only ones who are brainwashed, are the religious people (especially the extreme religious people, like you for example).

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    I don't think she can help it Pastor.

    She has been Brainwashed by Science and I expect she didn't go anywhere near a good Christian School to learn some hard facts.
    You may be right on this one. Dances is just another example of the kind of closeminded, reactionary thinking that comes from a secular humanist education.

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Good point Sister Virginia; even the left knows it's ideas are ridiculous even they know it so they will try to force any reasonable critic of them to shut any way they can. Dances is just an enforcer for the Darwinist Cabal.

    Dances, why don’t you stop being a tool for just this once?
    I don't think she can help it Pastor.

    She has been Brainwashed by Science and I expect she didn't go anywhere near a good Christian School to learn some hard facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Dances, why don’t you stop being a tool for just this once?
    I could make the same request of you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View Post
    Typical liberal tactic: instead of trying to rebut my arguments, you just spew cuss words against one of our members.

    You're one pathetic little slut.
    Good point Sister Virginia; even the left knows it's ideas are ridiculous even they know it so they will try to force any reasonable critic of them to shut any way they can. Dances is just an enforcer for the Darwinist Cabal.

    Dances, why don’t you stop being a tool for just this once?

    Leave a comment:


  • Virginia Day Templeton
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Typical liberal tactic: instead of trying to rebut my arguments, you just spew cuss words against one of our members.

    You're one pathetic little slut.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View Post
    You're saying that dinosaurs weren't mammals, and I've pointed out that (within the Darwinist camp) things aren't so clear-cut.

    Since we've never found a living dinosaur, who knows? Breasts aren't made of bone, so they wouldn't fossilize. I think Brother BJ knows a bit more about this stuff than you do.

    I think BJ doesn't know a hell of a lot about much of anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Virginia Day Templeton
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    You're saying that dinosaurs weren't mammals, and I've pointed out that (within the Darwinist camp) things aren't so clear-cut.

    Since we've never found a living dinosaur, who knows? Breasts aren't made of bone, so they wouldn't fossilize. I think Brother BJ knows a bit more about this stuff than you do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View Post
    Have you heard of Dimetrodon? The Darwinists can't decide whether it was a mammal, a reptile, or both.

    What's your point? Are you going to claim that it had breasts?

    Leave a comment:


  • Virginia Day Templeton
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Have you heard of Dimetrodon? The Darwinists can't decide whether it was a mammal, a reptile, or both.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Bah! More petty word games. You still haven't explained how a creature this large wouldn't be in danger of being killed by it's own breasts.

    One more time, BJ.
    Only mammals have breasts. DInosaurs were not mammals. Ergo, dinosaurs did not have breasts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Taxonomy is a synonym of classification. The word comes from the Greek: "taxis" and "nomos".
    Bah! More petty word games. You still haven't explained how a creature this large wouldn't be in danger of being killed by it's own breasts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Don't be throwing around false allegations boy, or we will press charges! We have a team of high priced jew taxonomists that keep us tax free, Praise Jesus. Including my Arabian Stallions, thank you Lord.
    Taxonomy is a synonym of classification. The word comes from the Greek: "taxis" and "nomos".

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Dinosaurs are not reptiles.

    OK - they were saurians.
    But that does not change the fact that only mammals have breasts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Peter View Post

    Actually, it were reptiles.
    The dinosaurs were reptiles (to avoid that people misunderstand my previous post)

    Leave a comment:

Working...