X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    Really, jiggling bosoms... hmm.

    Much of my missionary work is done at the hooters in Champaign Urbana (home of the University of Illinois), and from experience I can tell you that most of the girls who work there do not have jiggling bosoms.


    Too much plastic?

    And what live dinosaur have you seen to show that it did not have jiggling bosoms? *in lieu of a live dinosaur, I will also accept proof with a fully intact mummified dinosaur with a flat chest* Until you can show me that it DIDN'T have them, you can not say for certain that I am wrong.

    YIC
    V
    It would have had pectoral muscles, not mammary tissue. It's mammary tissue that "jiggles".

    Although I have to admit that the mental visual of a T rex in a Wonder Bra was pretty funny.
    Last edited by Old Iron Crotch; 06-14-2007, 06:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    BJ mentioned jiggling bosoms, which is what you find on the waitresses at Hooters. Dinosaurs did not have those.
    Really, jiggling bosoms... hmm.

    Much of my missionary work is done at the hooters in Champaign Urbana (home of the University of Illinois), and from experience I can tell you that most of the girls who work there do not have jiggling bosoms.

    And what live dinosaur have you seen to show that it did not have jiggling bosoms? *in lieu of a live dinosaur, I will also accept proof with a fully intact mummified dinosaur with a flat chest* Until you can show me that it DIDN'T have them, you can not say for certain that I am wrong.

    YIC
    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    So what does that have to do with how big the creatures breasts are???? Oh I get it, Dinosaurs naturally had bras to avoid damaging themselves with their over sized hooters. Typical Darwinist stunt to try to hide behind a semantic game. Face it, this creature is utterly implausible.
    Originally posted by Brother V View Post

    Then we can ask Brother BJ how he used the word breast... which he didn't...
    Actually, he did use the word breast.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    How about you just say you were wrong when you said that only mamals had breasts.

    Then we can ask Brother BJ how he used the word breast... which he didn't... he said bosom. You were the one who made the incorrect statement that "only mamals have breasts", when chickens have breasts.

    BJ mentioned jiggling bosoms, which is what you find on the waitresses at Hooters. Dinosaurs did not have those.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    Not in the sense tha BJ was using the word.
    How about you just say you were wrong when you said that only mamals had breasts.

    Then we can ask Brother BJ how he used the word breast... which he didn't... he said bosom. You were the one who made the incorrect statement that "only mamals have breasts", when chickens have breasts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    So you now know the intent of every word used? Interesting.

    Breast in the dictionary



    At MW.com the human definition is first, but second describes pretty much any animal. So... you still think that chickens don't have a breast?

    Not in the sense tha BJ was using the word.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    The term "breast" as applied to a bird is a misnomer, albeit a popular and longstanding one. A chicken "breast" is actually just pectoral muscle, not a true breast. A true breast contains mammary (milk-producing) tissue.
    So you now know the intent of every word used? Interesting.

    Breast in the dictionary

    1.Anatomy, Zoology. (in bipeds) the outer, front part of the thorax, or the front part of the body from the neck to the abdomen; chest.
    2.Zoology. the corresponding part in quadrupeds.
    3.either of the pair of mammae occurring on the chest in humans and having a discrete areola around the nipple, esp. the mammae of the female after puberty, which are enlarged and softened by hormonally influenced mammary-gland development and fat deposition and which secrete milk after the birth of a child: the breasts of males normally remain rudimentary.
    At MW.com the human definition is first, but second describes pretty much any animal. So... you still think that chickens don't have a breast?

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Iron Crotch
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    Really?

    What was that part of the chicken that I had for lunch yesterday?



    what's that thing there?

    My goodness, it's on both pictures... does that say... um... BREAST???

    How many times in this thread are you wrong? What other things are you wrong about?

    Did you mean to say nipples? Because no one in this thread ever claimed that the bones found had nipples.

    Good luck.

    YIC
    V

    The term "breast" as applied to a bird is a misnomer, albeit a popular and longstanding one. A chicken "breast" is actually just pectoral muscle, not a true breast. A true breast contains mammary (milk-producing) tissue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Dances with Joy View Post
    One more time, BJ.
    Only mammals have breasts. DInosaurs were not mammals. Ergo, dinosaurs did not have breasts.
    Really?

    What was that part of the chicken that I had for lunch yesterday?



    what's that thing there?

    My goodness, it's on both pictures... does that say... um... BREAST???

    How many times in this thread are you wrong? What other things are you wrong about?

    Did you mean to say nipples? Because no one in this thread ever claimed that the bones found had nipples.

    Good luck.

    YIC
    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    Becuase science is progressive, we need new words because we encounter new species. You have a book that's made up by some fools who then say they are god.
    Praise science!
    That's not progressive.
    That's called not being able to make your mind up about something.
    Silly Scientists keep making up darn fool "theories" and then another one comes along and changes it. Why? BECAUSE IT'S WRONG!
    What a waste of time!

    Genesis tells me all I need to know about God's Earth and how it was made.

    Praise the Lord

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    These Scientists just keep on making up new words as they go.
    We only need one book.

    The Bible (KJV1611)

    All the answers under one cover!!
    Becuase science is progressive, we need new words because we encounter new species. You have a book that's made up by some fools who then say they are god.
    Praise science!

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    It's part of the class synapsida. For the people who don't know what a class is: it's a term from the taxonomy. Other classes are: birds, mammals, reptiles,...
    These Scientists just keep on making up new words as they go.
    We only need one book.

    The Bible (KJV1611)

    All the answers under one cover!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: science = truth. All hail science!

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    Now don't be a silly boy Peter.
    I am the most open-minded forward thinking True Christian™ you could ever meet.
    I even sometimes drive my own Car when the Chauffeur is in Jail again for drink driving.
    Darn Negra.
    Is that the argument you give to say you are not brainwashed?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

    Originally posted by Virginia D. Templeton View Post
    Have you heard of Dimetrodon? The Darwinists can't decide whether it was a mammal, a reptile, or both.
    It's part of the class synapsida. For the people who don't know what a class is: it's a term from the taxonomy. Other classes are: birds, mammals, reptiles,...

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: science = truth

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    The only ones who are brainwashed, are the religious people (especially the extreme religious people, like you for example).
    Now don't be a silly boy Peter.
    I am the most open-minded forward thinking True Christian™ you could ever meet.
    I even sometimes drive my own Car when the Chauffeur is in Jail again for drink driving.
    Darn Negra.

    Leave a comment:

Working...