X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • god is a lie
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by BelieverInGod View Post
    No those quotes were meant to point out that I am not to tempt God by purposely drinking poison to prove a point.

    I noticed that you completely ignored the Pentecostals I linked to.
    OK so you claim that a true christian can drink poison, but you can't prove it (because that would be "tempting god") and if you were ever to drink poison without knowing it you would have no proof that you had drunk it afterward and therefore would again have no proof of it happening. Added to that, if you were to die after drinking poison unknowingly then that would simply mean that you are not a true christian...

    you have all your bases covered with that one dont you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Logan
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    First off, we are the same species. Says enough about you then I guess?
    You are going to hell, and us heaven. Don't you see the difference?
    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    You say hunderds of thousands of scientist(S) have failed.. Hmm go and look it up there is clear proof of that.
    Agreed, there is lots of proof the scientists have failed.
    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Your next comment is worthless.
    You are worthless.
    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    It says gaping holes in evolution theory, have you even seen the HUGE holes in yours? Evolution theory isn't complete yet => Holes that still need to be awnsered.
    There are gaping holes in evolution because it's wrong. nuff said.
    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    My eyes are starting too bleed.
    Perhaps an exorcism is in order?

    Leave a comment:


  • True Disciple
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    What are you trying to say? Your link only proves that Pokemon and evolution both come from the same source: Satan.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnmccurdy
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Evolution is absolutely ridiculous, only those stupid atheists would believe that. The fact we don't have tails is proof we did not evolve from monkeys.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obama Lama
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cranky Old Man
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Just die and make room for more intelligent people.
    While it is nice of you to kill yourself to increase the average intelligence of human kind, I would advice against it. God does not appreciate people taking their own lives.

    Leave a comment:


  • GOD=life
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Just die and make room for more intelligent people.
    See, that's what I mean with the atheist style of "tolerance".

    They openly call for Christians to die, often in a cruel and horrific way.

    And then they have the audacity to complain that we aren't tolerant.

    Very logical... not!

    Leave a comment:


  • Obama Lama
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Actually weird haircuts and clothing are against God's law. See the various threads about Goths for the Bible passage.

    You mistaken on "our interpretation" The Great Commission of Landover is follow The Bible fully and literally.

    This is what I mean.
    Just die and make room for more intelligent people.
    Not coming back anymore, can't be bothered you people are beyond reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    If this is what so called christianity is about then you can all burn.
    That's not religion, that's childish. It's like children in school pestering someone because he wears glasses or has a weird haircut or whatever.
    Actually weird haircuts and clothing are against God's law. See the various threads about Goths for the Bible passage.

    You mistaken on "our interpretation" The Great Commission of Landover is follow The Bible fully and literally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obama Lama
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    You claim it's all a lie, well how can you tell that yours is not a lie about something that happened thousands of years ago if it happened at all.
    I have not done bothered to do any research for this because for me this is merely for fun.
    I have done my research and drawn my own conclusions. But the fact that all of you take this stuff so seriously is just laughable.


    I have nothing against religion of any kind. I do have however something against discrimination. Wich is exactly what you people are doing.
    You want examples?
    There is a subforum here for men only. There are numerous threads in there e.g " when can i hit a woman" or " it's your fault i raped you". Etc.

    If this is what so called christianity is about then you can all burn.
    That's not religion, that's childish. It's like children in school pestering someone because he wears glasses or has a weird haircut or whatever.

    Leave a comment:


  • GOD=life
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Is there ANY proof at all, except for your "bible" for anything you people believe?
    Yes. Read this forum, there are numerous threads on this topic. Your failure to do research weakens your argument, not mine.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    I'm not saying real science is PERFECT but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than what you believe in.
    Look up "climategate": atheist scientists are known to use fraudulent "evidence" to support their claims. And even with the widespread fraud, there are still holes.

    But really, where did you learn that an expression of confidence equals a rational argument? You have shown no proof, no evidence, nothing. Just an appeal to the false authority of scientists.

    That's a fallacy, friend.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    What I seriously fail to understand is how people can follow a book that has no proof what so ever except for some words.
    That's because your conclusion is based on a false premise. It's circular reasoning. First you deny all of the proof that points to the KJV 1611 Bible, then you are surprised others don't. Simple as that. It's your own ignorance that speaks.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Saying homosexuality is a disease?
    Yes, and society suffers as a result.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs. Rogers
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    You say your 'science' has no holes? Is there ANY proof at all, except for your "bible" for anything you people believe?
    Of course not, you silly boy -- "proof" is a formal mathematical procedure! However, there is plenty of robust evidence which supports the science within the Bible; one only has to read the Bible, and then apply what one has read in the Bible to the world at large. Everything in this world can be molded to fit Biblical science; therefore, the evidence is irrefutable. Glory!

    Leave a comment:


  • Obama Lama
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by GOD=life View Post
    Calm down, friend. It was merely in jest I didn't mean to hit a nerve.


    Yes, so? Why would I say it otherwise?


    Thank you for your positive and constructive attitude I'm not even being sarcastic. Most of you atheists would be advocating mass-murder of Christians by now.


    That's a fallacy and only underscores that evolution theory is not a scientific theory that stands on its own, but rather is one that is constructed in direct opposition to God. It's not meant to prove anything, it's meant to disprove God. Naturally, it fails miserably, no matter how much atheists regard it as their gospel.

    As such, the idea of evolution theory being scientifically sound is absurd and cannot be taken seriously by any rational man.


    Thank you for at least admitting that the gospel of evolution has holes. How about we make a deal: while you fix the holes in your theory, we will stick to our scientific theory that has no holes.


    My apologies, I am used to conversing with fellow Christians of high intellectual caliber. Please point out the words you find difficult and I will explain their meaning in pedestrian vernacular.

    Oh i am perfectly calm, i'm even enjoying myself at your ignorance. You say your 'science' has no holes? Is there ANY proof at all, except for your "bible" for anything you people believe? I don't think so. As for real science there are millions of examples of all sorts of things. Nearly everything that is said has been proven. I'm not saying real science is PERFECT but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than what you believe in.
    An example I posted in another thread:
    You say earth has been made by god right? Well, I say it hasn't. And scientists are redoing exactly what has happend to make the earth, a.k.a the big bang. On a much smaller scale of course.

    What I seriously fail to understand is how people can follow a book that has no proof what so ever except for some words. And how you can be so ignorant to what time your living in. Saying homosexuality is a disease? Saying eating "gay" deer will make you gay? And funniest of all saying that the democrates have messed up all the animals so that they would participate in gay "relationships"?

    I got all the above mentioned out of one thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • GOD=life
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    First off, we are the same species. Says enough about you then I guess?
    Calm down, friend. It was merely in jest I didn't mean to hit a nerve.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    You say hunderds of thousands of scientist(S) have failed.. Hmm go and look it up there is clear proof of that.
    Yes, so? Why would I say it otherwise?

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Your next comment is worthless.
    Thank you for your positive and constructive attitude I'm not even being sarcastic. Most of you atheists would be advocating mass-murder of Christians by now.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    ..., have you even seen the HUGE holes in yours?
    That's a fallacy and only underscores that evolution theory is not a scientific theory that stands on its own, but rather is one that is constructed in direct opposition to God. It's not meant to prove anything, it's meant to disprove God. Naturally, it fails miserably, no matter how much atheists regard it as their gospel.

    As such, the idea of evolution theory being scientifically sound is absurd and cannot be taken seriously by any rational man.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Evolution theory isn't complete yet => Holes that still need to be awnsered.
    Thank you for at least admitting that the gospel of evolution has holes. How about we make a deal: while you fix the holes in your theory, we will stick to our scientific theory that has no holes.

    Originally posted by Obama Lama View Post
    Lastly, please check your spelling. My eyes are starting too bleed.
    My apologies, I am used to conversing with fellow Christians of high intellectual caliber. Please point out the words you find difficult and I will explain their meaning in pedestrian vernacular.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obama Lama
    replied
    Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

    Originally posted by GOD=life View Post
    Don't worry, uncontrolled emotion is normal among primitive species.


    Gee, I never saw it that way. Your parents must be so proud that you succeeded in a single sentence where hundreds of thousands of scientist have failed


    Wow, that's a slam dunk. I especially like how you used "next" here. It's not like there isn't extensive debate among scientists about the gaping holes in evolution theory, now is there?


    So you're saying evolution theory is not falsifiable? If it's not falsifiable, then it's not a scientific theory, which is what we've been saying all along!

    First off, we are the same species. Says enough about you then I guess?
    You say hunderds of thousands of scientist(S) have failed.. Hmm go and look it up there is clear proof of that.
    Your next comment is worthless. It says gaping holes in evolution theory, have you even seen the HUGE holes in yours? Evolution theory isn't complete yet => Holes that still need to be awnsered.

    Lastly, please check your spelling. My eyes are starting too bleed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...