More sickular nonsense: genetic sequencing to find disease cause

[BelieverInGod]

Re: More sickular nonsense: genetic sequencing to find disease ca

One subject’s genome cost just $50,000 to decode.

But they're not in it for the money, nope, not at all. They really just want to help people.

If genes mix, explain these sets of twins

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20249682,00.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9438648/

Obviously God has decided to pass the "sins of the father" onto only one of the children and blessing the other. It's not the first time he's played favourites with twins.

Romans 9:12-13
It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: More sickular nonsense: genetic sequencing to find disease ca

[Petal]

Re: More sickular nonsense: genetic sequencing to find disease ca

Those silly sickular scientists will believe anything, as long as it isn't in the Bible.

that be true, Mr.Pastor Peters. here be a bunch of them sickular science folk sequencin thier gene pool

[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: More sickular nonsense: genetic sequencing to find disease ca

Why shouldn't we teach the controversy and give equal time to the striped-stick theory?

Amen, Pastor Issac! You know, secular scientists and various internet evilutionists/Darwinists are always banging on about a perceived lack of "peer reviews" in regard to Godly science research; they conveniently ignore that striped-stick theory (and indeed all scientific fact within the Bible) is subject to an ongoing open peer review by Christians, and continues to pass muster.

And due to our privileged relationship with the LORD, every Christian is an impartial expert regarding Biblical science. Unsaved scientists cannot see what we see, their minds are closed and their hearts are hard; they know they are fools, but their pride prevents them from humbling themselves before Almighty God. Their professional jealousy renders them ineffective in the face of Godly Science ... indeed, angry secular scientific impotence is the fuel which drives the ongoing persecution of Creation Scientists, and the persecution of every Christian who dares to question their silly 'evolution' religion.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Those silly sickular scientists will believe anything, as long as it isn't in the Bible.

From the JYT:

Disease Cause Is Pinpointed With Genome

Two research teams have independently decoded the entire genome of patients to find the exact genetic cause of their diseases. The approach may offer a new start in the so far disappointing effort to identify the genetic roots of major killers like heart disease, diabetes and Alzheimer’s.

In the decade since the first full genetic code of a human was sequenced for some $500 million, less than a dozen genomes had been decoded, all of healthy people.

Geneticists said the new research showed it was now possible to sequence the entire genome of a patient at reasonable cost and with sufficient accuracy to be of practical use to medical researchers. One subject’s genome cost just $50,000 to decode.

That is just ridiculous. First, those "congenital" diseases are actually from God:

John 9:2-3: And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

Are those sickularists going to try to stand in the way when God wants to glorify Himself? How dare they play God like that!

Second, genetics and DNA are just a theory, and one that contradicts Genesis:

Genesis 30:37-39: And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and chesnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white appear which [was] in the rods. And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that they should conceive when they came to drink. And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted.

Why shouldn't we teach the controversy and give equal time to the striped-stick theory?