[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

ok, no the origins of species didn't mention google, now tell me, what significance does that have.

and by the way you seem to be missing the point of my original post aswell. i'll ask again.
does the bible say anything about google?

No, I'm not missing your point. You don't even have a point. It's just a useless red herring.

No, the Bible does not mention google (though it does predict the internet) and no it doesn't mention all the other billions of brand names, domain names, websites, trademarks, and all the other inventions in the world. Maybe the Prophets were too busy writing the WORD OF GOD down and exacting GOD's judgement upon the infidels to bother making a trade index catalog for the future.

It's not about what the Bible doesn't say. What you don't seem to be able to grasp is what the Bible does say. It directly contradicts evilution or abominablegenesis or whatever the latest theory-of-the-week might be.

It is explicitly written how the world was made and how life was formed in the Bible. It's the first book of the Bible, if you didn't notice. It's on the first page.

Get it? Good.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Are you intentionally missing the point?

ok, no the origins of species didn't mention google, now tell me, what significance does that have.

and by the way you seem to be missing the point of my original post aswell. i'll ask again.
does the bible say anything about google?

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

The Origin's of Species was a book written about a single specific topic (natural selection), where as the bible is suposedly the literal word of god. and as it was claimed the bible says nothing about abiogenesis, it also says nothing about google, so if abiogenesis is not real because it's not in the bible, than google must not be real either.

Are you intentionally missing the point?

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Did the Origin of Species mention google?

The Origin's of Species was a book written about a single specific topic (natural selection), where as the bible is suposedly the literal word of god. and as it was claimed the bible says nothing about abiogenesis, it also says nothing about google, so if abiogenesis is not real because it's not in the bible, than google must not be real either.

[The Hand]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

how am i a google worshipper? i simply asked if the bible said anything about google. because by the logic previously presented you cant believe in it if its not in the bible.

Did the Origin of Species mention google?

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

You have turned from monkey worship to google worship?

Exodus 20:3 - Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Enjoy hell, heathen, I know me and Jesus are going to enjoy watching you burn!

how am i a google worshipper? i simply asked if the bible said anything about google. because by the logic previously presented you cant believe in it if its not in the bible.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1. go study your physcis more.

3. dude, it is the earth magnetic field that causes the decay..

=.=

4. and what will the judge say "it's all false!". Show me evidences of all those that happen.

The half-life of a nuclide depends solely on its nuclear properties; it is not affected by external factors such as temperature, pressure, chemical environment, or presence of a magnetic or electric field.

maybe the judge would say that "it's all false", if he was a creationist. but there are also judges that believe in evolution, and people that believe in evolution, and around 95% of the scientific comunity say evolution is correct. (oh, and that study is not seperating those who only study things related to evolution, it is ALL scientists, so of that 5%, not all even study biology)
evidance of evolution
-fossil records
-biology
-genetics
and many others.
what evidance do you have for creation? oh... right.... a book.

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1) there are several theories within abiogenesis science, but just because something is difficult, it dosen't mean it is impossible, as you said "they bond with h2o easier" but that doesen't mean they won't bond with others. however as i have said previously, i am not a scientist and only have a basic understanding of abiogenesis.

3) actually the earth's magnetic field is only involved in one dating method. and this method is only used by young earth creationists. radiometric dating has nothing to do with the magnetic field of the planet.

4) what, imagine i am in court and i said that abiogenesis and evolution are to seperate theories. i don't think i would get laughed at, mainly because the statement is true. the problem is that people often confuse evolution with abiogenesis, and cosmology.
i will seperate these for you.
Cosmology is about the origins of the universe.
Abiogenesis is about the origins of life on earth
Evolution is about how groups of already living things change over time.

they are all seperate theories.

1. go study your physcis more.

3. dude, it is the earth magnetic field that causes the decay..

=.=

4. and what will the judge say "it's all false!". Show me evidences of all those that happen.

[Chris T]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

but let me give you another. GOOGLE. try to find that in a bible. if god is omnipotent he should have mentioned something about google.

You have turned from monkey worship to google worship?

Exodus 20:3 - Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Enjoy hell, heathen, I know me and Jesus are going to enjoy watching you burn!

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

De:21:12: Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

OK, you believe now? Your Faith has been restored? Or are you simply a mindless atheist denying everything you can't understand?

you are missing the point, what i'm saying is that just because something isn't in the bible dosen't mean it dosen't exist. I will admit i made a poor choice for an example. but let me give you another. GOOGLE. try to find that in a bible. if god is omnipotent he should have mentioned something about google.

actually you deny all you can't understand (denying science that you have little to no grasp of), i accept that there are many thing i will not understand in my lifetime, but that does not stop me from trying to understand them. i don't fully know how every part of a car works, but i don't deny that a car exists.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1. the bible dosen't say anything about finger/toe nails, does that mean that toe/fingernails don't exist?[...].

De:21:12: Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house; and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails;

OK, you believe now? Your Faith has been restored? Or are you simply a mindless atheist denying everything you can't understand?

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Haven't you ever read the bible? I don't remember reading about any "Amino acids" in there.

Your own religion claims abiogenesis to be false. Early earth (about 6000 Years ago) had oxygen, and the reaction to create your silly amino acids cannot happen with oxygen present. Don't you feel silly?

Also evilution was reverse-engineered by false scientists, It can't compete with the perfection of Genesis in the good ol' KJV1611 bible.

1. the bible dosen't say anything about finger/toe nails, does that mean that toe/fingernails don't exist?

2. what religion do you speak of? and by the way, this theory is based on the world being 4.5 BILLION years old.

3. no, evolution was created by REAL scienitists, that use the scientific method, and examine all evidance. not just find things that support your theory and disregard all other evidance.

[Steven E]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

Ok.

1. where did the bonding between amino acids came from, remember, amino acid don't bond with each other well, they bond with H2O easier and faster. What makes them bond together in sea?

2. Suit yourself

3. Basically all datings are based on earth magnetic field. With failing magnetic field strength, the dating graph (reverse exponent) with be larger, tricking people to think it's "millions of years old" rather than actual 6 thousand years.

4. Haha, that's a joke. People will have hard time to believe that. Imagine you're a witness in a court and tell this to the judge. I think the whole court will laugh at you.

1) there are several theories within abiogenesis science, but just because something is difficult, it dosen't mean it is impossible, as you said "they bond with h2o easier" but that doesen't mean they won't bond with others. however as i have said previously, i am not a scientist and only have a basic understanding of abiogenesis.

3) actually the earth's magnetic field is only involved in one dating method. and this method is only used by young earth creationists. radiometric dating has nothing to do with the magnetic field of the planet.

4) what, imagine i am in court and i said that abiogenesis and evolution are to seperate theories. i don't think i would get laughed at, mainly because the statement is true. the problem is that people often confuse evolution with abiogenesis, and cosmology.
i will seperate these for you.
Cosmology is about the origins of the universe.
Abiogenesis is about the origins of life on earth
Evolution is about how groups of already living things change over time.

they are all seperate theories.

[Logan]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1) Amino acids (often called "the building blocks of life") and most amino acids can be created from chemical reactions unrelated to life.

Haven't you ever read the bible? I don't remember reading about any "Amino acids" in there.

4) In the sense that one happens (abiogenesis) and then after the other happened (evolution), but other than that, they are still separate theories.

Your own religion claims abiogenesis to be false. Early earth (about 6000 Years ago) had oxygen, and the reaction to create your silly amino acids cannot happen with oxygen present. Don't you feel silly?

Also evilution was reverse-engineered by false scientists, It can't compete with the perfection of Genesis in the good ol' KJV1611 bible.

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Results of my 10 year evolution experiment REVEALED!!!!Must R

1) Amino acids (often called "the building blocks of life") and most amino acids can be created from chemical reactions unrelated to life.

2) ok.

3) Actually, radiometric dating isn't based on C-14 levels, radioCARBON dating is, but that is only one form of radiometric dating. In fact is not the prefered method. Carbon dating can only be used to date back as far as 58,000-68,000 years, because of that it is not used to date the age of the earth.

4) In the sence that one happend (abiogenesis) and then after the other happened (evolution), but other than that, they are still seperate theories.

Ok.

1. where did the bonding between amino acids came from, remember, amino acid don't bond with each other well, they bond with H2O easier and faster. What makes them bond together in sea?

2. Suit yourself

3. Basically all datings are based on earth magnetic field. With failing magnetic field strength, the dating graph (reverse exponent) with be larger, tricking people to think it's "millions of years old" rather than actual 6 thousand years.

4. Haha, that's a joke. People will have hard time to believe that. Imagine you're a witness in a court and tell this to the judge. I think the whole court will laugh at you.