Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

[Brother Enoch]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

Except that we never said stars were alive. None of these theories of evolution ever said that stars were living, we actually say the opposite. It is called evolution because all these things "evolve," i.e. they progress and change over time.

Um no. That's called aging. Yes things age.

Evolution is the silly notion that atoms got bored not being alive and decided to become bacteria instead, then turned into dinosaurs, because they hated being so small and had some kind of complex about it, so they decided on hugeness, then they were all killed because the universe threw a rock at them, except the smart ones who turned themselves into mice then eventually decided to be monkeys, because trees are more fun than holes in the ground, and maybe the universe wasn't mad anymore and might let them get a little bigger without throwing another rock, then they turned into humans, except for the monkeys who didn't like indoor plumbing and stayed monkeys.

[Dirk]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

1. Where did Helium evolve from?
2. How did a star form?

Answer me these questions according to your believe before going further.

2 amazing questions atheists can't answer.

[Malaysia_Christian]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

Let's discuss it. Without using the bible, let's discuss why it is "impossible."

1. Where did Helium evolve from?
2. How did a star form?

Answer me these questions according to your believe before going further.

PS: This is Christian Forum. If I'm posting in Atheist forum saying "without using evolution and big bang, let's discuss why it it impossible?" I think my post will get no reply.

Because science compliments the Bible, and not lies.

[Brother Enoch]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

Let's discuss it. Without using the bible, let's discuss why it is "impossible."

Okay. But same condition to you.

I can't use the Bible? You can't use any scientific text, discovery or thought of any other person.

It's just you and me. I give up Jesus as my authority, you give up Galileo, Newton, Mendeleev, Darwin et al.

Agreed?

Okay. You first.

[Petal]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

It is called evolution because all these things "evolve," i.e. they progress and change over time.

then why come we never ever sees a stars evolve into somethang else? an i not belives that there be baby stars cuz that would means that 2 grown stars got marrieds an then dids the lurvin nasty an then the momma star gots pregnint an stuff. i thinks them picktures of star nurserys be fotoshopped, it be a conspiracys

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

Except that we never said stars were alive. None of these theories of evolution ever said that stars were living, we actually say the opposite. It is called evolution because all these things "evolve," i.e. they progress and change over time.

But when we ask you why a 747 can't evolve out of a junk yard, you tell us it's because only living things can evolve.

Please make up your minds.

[paula]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

According to you people because stars aren't alive.

According to the Bible (you do realize this is a Christian board right?) because it just didn't happen.

Except that we never said stars were alive. None of these theories of evolution ever said that stars were living, we actually say the opposite. It is called evolution because all these things "evolve," i.e. they progress and change over time.

[Levi Jones]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

Thank you, sister BIG for your response to the same proposal that has been laid down hundreds of times.

To the unsaved trash, learn to use the search feature. Sorry, I'm not in the mood.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Cosmic, Stellar, and Chemical Evolution

According to you people because stars aren't alive.

According to the Bible (you do realize this is a Christian board right?) because it just didn't happen.

[paula]

Let's discuss it. Without using the bible, let's discuss why it is "impossible."