[Sionisx2]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

I've got equally strong proof that disease isn't caused by germs: go over to some fast food joint, (or make one yourself) buy a hamburger and leave it out in the open for about 3 months. After it is dutifully green and white-ish colored, eat it. Because if you have strong faith, you won't get sick.
And no, it's not because of God.

See how weak your argument is?

Fixed it for you.

To say that by eating that rotting burger, and the amazing amount of fungi and such that's on it isn't a direct result of your being sick, is borderline insanity, (much like these forums )or ignorance, sorry.

Shows that you don't really know what you're talking about..
"Drano" isn't the name of a compound (There's no such thing as 'drano acid'), nor is it even an acid..
It's a base.

Sorry, I mistook drano for a sulfuric drain cleaner.

BTW Why do you think the burger becomes all mis-colored if left out like that?
It's because a whole load of demons looking for a home have moved in, of course!
So obviously, eating it is a very bad idea, as those demons will end up in your colon if you do.

Or, you know, it could be because the moisture of the burger is a great place for mold spores to thrive. (OMG! Science! RUN!!!)


"Mold forms very easily in damp and wet conditions; especially on organic materials or products containing wet cellulose and that are low in nitrogen. The mold produces a kind of toxin known as mycotoxin, which is very harmful when consumed."

But wait! That's science... and we don't accept science here. I'm finished even viewing these forums. It's ridiculous.

[JennyD]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

But wait! That's science... and we don't accept science here. I'm finished even viewing these forums. It's ridiculous.

Science in itself is not at all ridiculous, and we certainly embrace it here. Sure, things follow physical laws, and those laws may be deduced through observation.

However, God creates those Laws. They are spelled out in the Bible! There is nothing wrong with observing how God's Laws play out in nature and explaining that beauty and wonder to the ignorant!

Science becomes ridiculous when it becomes a religion; when people believe Science created the universe instead of God, for example, or when they believe that a little voltage detector can determine whether they are possessed by demons left behind by Lord Xenu, or when they misguidedly put their faith in human science instead of the study of God's Laws and deduction of solutions therefrom.

Do you see the difference now?

[jessev]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

Just to note something. If you're talking about Scientology, I would hardly consider that a religion based on science. It was based on a book written by a novelist. I've read some of what's in their scientology book and gave me a chuckle. It makes very little sense to me. But from what I've observed, when someone believes in something, (regardless of what it is) completely blindly, can be a potentially dangerous thing. For me, science has always been the yearning to understand the universe around us. And while science can't explain everything, of course. There are many things that science has been able to explain that would not have been known otherwise. Afterall, simply deducing an answer from something you see is an example of science. I agree that there are many who take science a little too seriously in that they put their entire belief on a particular theory on being correct, when it may not be. But understand this: a scientific theory is not just some random explanation for something. It's a tested hypothesis that has not shown to be incorrect yet. Now I may be slightly unknowing on the specifics. But I'm not sure how many physical laws are explained much in the bible. Though, I know of a fair number of things that would appear to not agree with the observed natural laws of physics within the book.

Science in itself is not at all ridiculous, and we certainly embrace it here. Sure, things follow physical laws, and those laws may be deduced through observation.

However, God creates those Laws. They are spelled out in the Bible! There is nothing wrong with observing how God's Laws play out in nature and explaining that beauty and wonder to the ignorant!

Science becomes ridiculous when it becomes a religion; when people believe Science created the universe instead of God, for example, or when they believe that a little voltage detector can determine whether they are possessed by demons left behind by Lord Xenu, or when they misguidedly put their faith in human science instead of the study of God's Laws and deduction of solutions therefrom.

Do you see the difference now?

[MrMannnly]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

Just to note something. If you're talking about Scientology, I would hardly consider that a religion based on science. It was based on a book written by a novelist.

If it wasn't based on science, then why would it be called scientology? It's the same root word, back to the Latin scientia, meaning "to know". Scientologists believe that their religion is correct. So do scientists. That's how religions work.

I've read some of what's in their scientology book and gave me a chuckle. It makes very little sense to me.

Same here. I once picked up a NIV Version Bible and it had the same effect. Most pagan religions do that

But from what I've observed, when someone believes in something, (regardless of what it is) completely blindly, can be a potentially dangerous thing.

Thank God for faith! But blind beliefs, like those held by Catholics, Jews, Mormons, Scientists/Scientologists, etc are certainly dangerous. Their lack of the guiding hand of the Holy Ghost is visibly lacking in their lives.

For me, science has always been the yearning to understand the universe around us. And while science can't explain everything, of course. There are many things that science has been able to explain that would not have been known otherwise.

So is the study of the Bible; are you saying that when we study the Bible we are employing "science"? When a child is curious about the bug on the wall and pops it into his mouth, is that science? Are we making up our own definitions here?

Afterall, simply deducing an answer from something you see is an example of science. I agree that there are many who take science a little too seriously in that they put their entire belief on a particular theory on being correct, when it may not be.

Anyone who puts their faith in "science" instead of an omnipotent God is simply out of their minds; I cant think of a gentler way to put it. Honestly, if you were to try to guess what's in a box, would you blindly guess, or would you ask the person who put it in there? Now that is a reasonable theory in any dimension

But understand this: a scientific theory is not just some random explanation for something. It's a tested hypothesis that has not shown to be incorrect yet.

This is the worst fallacy that "scientists" roll out every so often, and I am sick and tired of it. I can say that the moon has invisible pink unicorns running around and call that a scientific theory--it hasn't been proven wrong yet. It's absurd, and it's a slap in the face to a God who has given you a mind of reason.

Now I may be slightly unknowing on the specifics. But I'm not sure how many physical laws are explained much in the bible. Though, I know of a fair number of things that would appear to not agree with the observed natural laws of physics within the book.

Everything that we ever needed to know about the Universe (which, by the way, is a combination of Uni- meaning "one" and -verse, meaning word... ONE WORD, think about it--Genesis 1:1) is in the Bible. There is nothing in there that requires the billions of dollars that the Obamania administration is just funneling into the groveling throats of greedy scientists. Scientists just spent something like $150 billion of our taxpayer dollars on a giant merry-go-round to find the so-called "God Particle", and I only spent $200 on my Bible and I know that there isn't one. I can predict it now with 110% certainty and I didn't spend a fraction of what they spent! You want an economic savings plan for the U.S.A., well I just found one!

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

Bump.

It has been almost four years, and still no serious challengers.

I think we can consider "germ theory" to be officially dead.

Take THAT, Satan!

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[napa valley nan]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

whats your theories about the 'disease' of alchohol? My parents were both alholics for which reason I went to Alanon Anonymous, for the adult children of the alcoholic. they would always speak on 'the disease' of alcoholics and that's part what helped me forgive, but i go back / and / or forth on it. What does the alcoholic germ look like?

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

whats your theories about the 'disease' of alchohol? My parents were both alholics for which reason I went to Alanon Anonymous, for the adult children of the alcoholic. they would always speak on 'the disease' of alcoholics and that's part what helped me forgive, but i go back / and / or forth on it. What does the alcoholic germ look like?

Excellent point, Nan.

Alcoholism is strongly associated with the sin of drunkenness, so there's yet another heavy point in favor of the sin theory of disease.

Unless some germ theory believer wants to claim the prize by explaining which microbe is responsible for alcoholism.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Little Donkey]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

Alcoholism is strongly associated with the sin of drunkenness, so there's yet another heavy point in favor of the sin theory of disease.

For the most part, I don't believe in any so-called "Theories". However, Pastor if you call it a Sin Theory then I must admit an exception. The Sin Theory explains all cases of death. People are born with sin and God will smite them unless they become Saved. But even among the Saved, people tend to get forgetful and accumulate minor sins without regular cleansing and forgiveness. It only takes one tiny, tiny sin compounded over many years for God to have no choice but to smite thee down.

[napa valley nan]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

Excellent point, Nan.

no I am saying not Yes or No..I was asking about your thoughts on the Disease of Alcoholis .

It was easier to forgive /but not forget/ my 'accidents' etcetra and bad memories when I got told my parents were victim of a DISEASE called alcoholism..but I always wondered Did someone put guns to their heads and MAKE THEM drink like they did No I don't think so.

But it is harder to forgive if we are asked to say Yes, there was no 'disease' they were just selfish mess piles. Doctors say it is a disease but I do not know. Thats why I wondere if they found microbes making them and other people drink

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

For the most part, I don't believe in any so-called "Theories". However, Pastor if you call it a Sin Theory then I must admit an exception. The Sin Theory explains all cases of death. People are born with sin and God will smite them unless they become Saved. But even among the Saved, people tend to get forgetful and accumulate minor sins without regular cleansing and forgiveness. It only takes one tiny, tiny sin compounded over many years for God to have no choice but to smite thee down.

Friend, the Bible and I disagree strongly with what I have bolded above.

Sin is a voluntary choice to rebel against God (Is 30:9). No one is born a sinner (Ezk 18:19-20), there are no such things as involuntary, compulsory, or accidental sins (Ezk 3:19, I Jn 3:4), and there is no such thing as irresistible temptation (I Cor 10:13).

Only unsaved people sin, and a Christian, once saved, never sins again. If you sin, it is proof that you are not saved. (I Jn 3:6-9)

The doctrine of "original sin" is a lie. It's just an excuse for people to avoid responsibility for their own sins. People try to say that they can't help but sin, and, pardon my French, but that's just a bunch of bull hockey. Anybody can avoid sin. All you have to do is not do it. I don't see what's so hard about that.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Little Donkey]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

Friend, the Bible and I disagree strongly with what I have bolded above.

Sin is a voluntary choice to rebel against God (Is 30:9). No one is born a sinner (Ezk 18:19-20), there are no such things as involuntary, compulsory, or accidental sins (Ezk 3:19, I Jn 3:4), and there is no such thing as irresistible temptation (I Cor 10:13).

Only unsaved people sin, and a Christian, once saved, never sins again. If you sin, it is proof that you are not saved. (I Jn 3:6-9)

The doctrine of "original sin" is a lie. It's just an excuse for people to avoid responsibility for their own sins. People try to say that they can't help but sin, and, pardon my French, but that's just a bunch of bull hockey. Anybody can avoid sin. All you have to do is not do it. I don't see what's so hard about that.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

Praise Jesus! This is why I am here, to learn and overcome years of illogical indoctrination. Thank you Pastor

[Pentix]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

Persons wishing to collect the $250,000,000 may submit their evidence in writing along with a nonrefundable $5000 processing fee. They are busy people and do not wish to waste time on foolish responses, and this is why the $5000 nonrefundable processing fee is required.

i couldnt help but laugh when i read the $5000 fee. of course i understand the reason behind it.

you obviously dont believe in the germ theory. i would like to know what you believe causes people to become sick.

[Russell Holbeck]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germ Theory Believers (Germunists)

i couldnt help but laugh when i read the $5000 fee. of course i understand the reason behind it.

you obviously dont believe in the germ theory. i would like to know what you believe causes people to become sick.

Hello Pentix.

There are many things that can cause illness even something like a broken spirit look at Proverbs 17:22 it says:

A merry heart doeth good like a medicine: but a broken spirit drieth the bones.

Thank you.

Rusty

P.S. You should introduce yourself at the Introduction Forum that would be good manners.

[maxfailing]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

You can't change a theory into a Law. It doesn't work that way, never has and never will.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: $250,000,000 Challenge to Germunists

You can't change a theory into a Law. It doesn't work that way, never has and never will.

Hi, and welcome to our friendly forum! The truth is, scientists change their minds all the time. This so-called "germ theory" is only one such fabrication created in the imagination of the Big Pharma Profit Division.

A few examples of changing scientific "theory" include:

• Spontaneous generation - is a principle regarding the origin of life from inanimate matter, which held that this process was a commonplace and everyday occurrence, as distinguished from univocal generation, or reproduction from parent(s).
• Transmutation of species, Lamarckism, inheritance of acquired characteristics - first theories of evolution.
• Maternal impression – the theory that the mother's thoughts created birth defects.
• Miasma theory of disease – the theory that diseases are caused by "bad air. “
• Recapitulation theory – the theory that "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny".
• Telegony – the theory that an offspring can inherit characteristics from a previous mate of its mother's as well as its actual parents
• Out of Asia theory of human origin

Oh, but when you consider the Truth© as revealed in God's Holy Word (the Holy Bible), you'll find information about the natural world that never changes!

• Both man and woman possess the seed of life (Genesis 3:15) discovered by man in 17th century
• Earth is held in place by invisible forces (Job 26:7) discovered by man in 1650
• Blood is necessary for life (Leviticus 17:11) discovered by man in 19th century
• Oceans have natural paths in them (Psalms 8:8) discovered by man in1854
• Light is a particle and has mass (a photon) (Job 38:19) discovered by man in 1932
• Stars give off signals (Job 38:7) discovered by man in 1945
• Oceans contain fresh water springs (Job 38:16) discovered by man in 1920
• Dust is important to survival (Isaiah 40:12) discovered by man in 1935
• Hubert Spencer's scientific principles (Genesis 1) discovered by man in 1820
• Air has weight (Job 28:25) discovered by man in the 16th century
• Light can be split up into component colors (Job 38:24) discovered by man in 1650
• Matter is made up of invisible particles (Romans 1:20) discovered by man in 20th century
• Water cycle (Ecclesiastes 1:7) discovered by man in 17th century
• Lightning and thunder are related (Job 38:25) discovered by man in 19th century

Praise Jesus!

Challenge yourself to learn the Truth©