X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BelieverInGod
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Oh wow, this one even links to the thread this should be in.

    Really, you're not that special.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by GOd is black View Post
    disapointed i expected 'god' to smite me all that happend was my toast burnt
    It would appear that God smote your brain quite heavily a long time ago, you just haven't noticed yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • teenaged mocker
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    It's simple. They want you to burn in Hell. If you can't believe the Earth is flat, then you can't believe parts of the Bible, which means you can't believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God, which means you have no reason to believe Christ was your Savior. Understand?
    I'm flattered that all the scientists in the world care so much about my fate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by GOd is black View Post
    HAHAH, this is like poking a caged tiger 'if that tiger was even existant' im sure "god" is more than happy to have MJ sitting next to him in heaven with Allah and budda i wish i was a fly in you christians imagination would be hilarious to see what you thinks really , I know lets go on a road trip to visit "god" christ we cant can we going to have to kill yourselfs to do that arnt you. shit sorry, christ should have known.
    You are mocking the Lord and doomed to an eternity in he fires of hell. I would not be surprised if you were poked by MJ.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by 159753 View Post
    What possible reason could science have for lying to us about the shape and size of the earth?
    It's simple. They want you to burn in Hell. If you can't believe the Earth is flat, then you can't believe parts of the Bible, which means you can't believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God, which means you have no reason to believe Christ was your Savior. Understand?

    Leave a comment:


  • teenaged mocker
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    What possible reason could science have for lying to us about the shape and size of the earth?

    Leave a comment:


  • Phebe Carlyle
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    I have no idea where Martin Luther King, Jr got his speeches from, just if Wikipedia claims one things it is usually safe to assume that the opposite is the case.
    Any idea how many otherwise intelligent students have managed to lower their grades by using Wikipedia?
    Exactly, and that is why my only(if I MUST use something other than bible or recipe reference) source of information is Conservapedia and occasionally the wonderful Creation Sciencist works of Ken. (not Barbie's homer boyfriend)

    YIC,

    Mrs.P.Wintersnow

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by aim for heaven View Post
    something YOU won't hear from me very often. Yes you are correct there. I was looking for some simple citation that this simpleton might accept as fact. I did not believe him capable of handling a book review much less the book itself. You will have to excuse me now, after admitting you were correct, I suddenly feel very ill!
    Oh you may find that if you took the time to understand what I say you might realise that I speak the TRUTH after all we both KNOW that the universe and everything in it was created by GOD, it is just that you have not found the REAL one yet and I have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    I have no idea where Martin Luther King, Jr got his speeches from, just if Wikipedia claims one things it is usually safe to assume that the opposite is the case.
    Any idea how many otherwise intelligent students have managed to lower their grades by using Wikipedia?
    something YOU won't hear from me very often. Yes you are correct there. I was looking for some simple citation that this simpleton might accept as fact. I did not believe him capable of handling a book review much less the book itself. You will have to excuse me now, after admitting you were correct, I suddenly feel very ill!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by aim for heaven View Post
    Ok PASTA BOY here is how the lie-beral press tried to ''white wash'' MLK
    .
    .
    .
    I have no idea where Martin Luther King, Jr got his speeches from, just if Wikipedia claims one things it is usually safe to assume that the opposite is the case.
    Any idea how many otherwise intelligent students have managed to lower their grades by using Wikipedia?

    Leave a comment:


  • True Disciple
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by GOd is black View Post
    HAHAH, this is like poking a caged tiger 'if that tiger was even existant' im sure "god" is more than happy to have MJ sitting next to him in heaven with Allah and budda i wish i was a fly in you christians imagination would be hilarious to see what you thinks really ,
    Why do you want to be a fly?

    I know lets go on a road trip to visit "god" christ we cant can we going to have to kill yourselfs to do that arnt you. shit sorry, christ should have known.
    You seem to be threatening to commit suicide, something against which I fiercely object. Of course, it might just as well be me being confused by your eccentric grammar and haphazard use of interpunction...

    Leave a comment:


  • Benedict A. Davis
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by Jo Freddie View Post
    You expect us to believe anything that is on Wikipedia?

    Today's world is capable of sharing vast amounts of information at a rapid pace via the Internet. However, the accuracy of this information can be a serious question. Websites posing as genuine sources of knowledge or news are often serving their own hidden agenda under the guise of legitimacy. Nowhere is this more problematic than with the questionable process and ethics of Wikipedia.

    wikipedia is wrong
    Ok PASTA BOY here is how the lie-beral press tried to ''white wash'' MLK


    Miller (English, Arizona State) has written a complex, convincing analysis of the sources of King's major sermons and public works. In brief, Miller argues that King borrowed ideas, patterns, words, even whole paragraphs from two main sources: white Protestant ministers' radio sermons and the traditions of the African American folk pulpit. King melded these "borrowings" into consistently powerful sermons for social change. To Miller, this was not plagiarism, but perfectly consistent with the American homiletic tradition. King's ability to reshape old works was his greatest rhetorical strength. Miller's study provides a fascinating counterpoint to recent attacks on King's originality. It is highly recommended for all major libraries.
    - A.O. Edmonds, Ball State Univ., Muncie, Ind.


    BOOK REVIEW-
    his review is from: Voice of Deliverance: The Language of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Its Sources (Paperback) This superb book deserves to be widely read. It is well known that King plagiarised much of his academic work and many of the passages from his sermons and speeches, but Miller compelling explains this practice as the hallmark of the oral culture of African American religion that produced its finest example in King himself. Although Miller doesn't cite classical literature, King's method of creating his own unique works from the building blocks of others is a central and completely accepted insight into scholarship on Homer's Odyssey and Iliad, and it is well known that Shakespeare closely followed the plots of third rate plays to produce his own masterpieces

    Leave a comment:


  • Jo Freddie
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by aim for heaven View Post
    From Wikipedia
    You expect us to believe anything that is on Wikipedia?

    Today's world is capable of sharing vast amounts of information at a rapid pace via the Internet. However, the accuracy of this information can be a serious question. Websites posing as genuine sources of knowledge or news are often serving their own hidden agenda under the guise of legitimacy. Nowhere is this more problematic than with the questionable process and ethics of Wikipedia.

    wikipedia is wrong

    Leave a comment:


  • GOd is black
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    HAHAH, this is like poking a caged tiger 'if that tiger was even existant' im sure "god" is more than happy to have MJ sitting next to him in heaven with Allah and budda i wish i was a fly in you christians imagination would be hilarious to see what you thinks really , I know lets go on a road trip to visit "god" christ we cant can we going to have to kill yourselfs to do that arnt you. shit sorry, christ should have known.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phebe Carlyle
    replied
    Re: Creationism is wrong

    Originally posted by GOd is black View Post
    So he can only burn my toast? or could i annoy him till he cooks my pizza?
    Okay im guessing last guess was wrong so im going to go with hitlers assasin, or the man who could have thought of the condom so he couldnt have been brought into this evolved world. close yet? or is it Michael Jackson the kiddie fiddler?
    Well, Jesus Christ my Lord and Savior died (temporarily) for MY sins. Perhaps you are are suggesting that Michael Jackon is burning in hell for yours because you are admitting to being a kiddie fiddler!

    I don't care who killed Hitler, he was a papist brown-noser. The one redeeming feature about Hitler is that he killed many Jesus hating joos.

    YIC,

    Mrs.P.Wintersnow.

    Leave a comment:

Working...