X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aristotle
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by michael the hater View Post
    so why have i seen a post with regards to anal sex being ok on this forum?
    Because it is a well known fact that there is a direct correlation between homosexuality and atheism.

    i am not constantly trying to argue against god but i like to see all sides before i make a decision. big bang theory is just one theory.
    Hey, we are not the ones that go around claiming that giant black hole monsters are out there eating up stars.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lisa H
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by michael the hater View Post
    so why have i seen a post with regards to anal sex being ok on this forum?

    i am not constantly trying to argue against god but i like to see all sides before i make a decision. big bang theory is just one theory.
    The big bang theory is just a lie stolen from the Bible. God created everything, it is not hard to understand.

    Leave a comment:


  • michael the hater
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    Actually brother, the reason that atheists are constantly trying to argue that there is no God, is because they want to justify having anal sex. Theirs is a movement founded entirely upon one unholy abomination: the act of inserting phallic objects into the anuses of one another. Not only that, but the only reason people have found to justify anal sex is atheism. As long as there is a God, people know that anal sex is disgusting to Him, and therefore totally unjustifiable as a way of life. But if they can somehow convince people that there is no God, they can easily recruit other whores and faggots into their perverted lifestyle.
    so why have i seen a post with regards to anal sex being ok on this forum?

    i am not constantly trying to argue against god but i like to see all sides before i make a decision. big bang theory is just one theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by Jeremiah Abernathy View Post
    It's funny how Athiests delude themselves into believing this Big Bang "theory" isn't complete hogwash. They go out of their way to convince us Godly Christians that we're idiots for believing in God, and that we should instead believe that some massive ball appeared out of nothing for no reason and then randomly blew up in an explosion that defies their own science to somehow create the Universe. Now which seems more ridiculous to you? A God creating a perfect Universe with a purpose or a magical bomb somehow coming into existence from nothing so it can make a cosmic explosion for no reason? Luckily there are people out there smart enough to see this scientific "theory" for what it really is. I feel Athiests only try so hard to convince others of the Big Bang because they want to validate their belief in what they know is a lie.
    Actually brother, the reason that atheists are constantly trying to argue that there is no God, is because they want to justify having anal sex. Theirs is a movement founded entirely upon one unholy abomination: the act of inserting phallic objects into the anuses of one another. Not only that, but the only reason people have found to justify anal sex is atheism. As long as there is a God, people know that anal sex is disgusting to Him, and therefore totally unjustifiable as a way of life. But if they can somehow convince people that there is no God, they can easily recruit other whores and faggots into their perverted lifestyle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeremiah Abernathy
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    It's funny how Athiests delude themselves into believing this Big Bang "theory" isn't complete hogwash. They go out of their way to convince us Godly Christians that we're idiots for believing in God, and that we should instead believe that some massive ball appeared out of nothing for no reason and then randomly blew up in an explosion that defies their own science to somehow create the Universe. Now which seems more ridiculous to you? A God creating a perfect Universe with a purpose or a magical bomb somehow coming into existence from nothing so it can make a cosmic explosion for no reason? Luckily there are people out there smart enough to see this scientific "theory" for what it really is. I feel Athiests only try so hard to convince others of the Big Bang because they want to validate their belief in what they know is a lie.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by michael the hater View Post
    and your gullible enough to believe a book that has no backing
    The Bible does too have backing. It has all the backing a book can get: the backing of the Word of God©!

    2 Timothy 3:16 (King James Version)

    16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

    Leave a comment:


  • michael the hater
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    please dont complain about how i use your forums quote function. i remember a time you begged me to use it, now i'm using it wrong. what next? haha!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nobar King
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Please figure out how to write with quotes. Your text IS NOT QUOTED and should be OUTSIDE the quote box.

    Leave a comment:


  • michael the hater
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    How likely is that? Who's going to believe that? Can your scientists prove any of it? It's like Startrek, it's all in the fevered imagination of atheists, stressed because their world is falling apart!

    and can you prove any of your faith? no you cannot because it exactly that. just faith. faith proves nothing. faith proves you believe in something in its entireity. that doesnt mean its true.

    i'll edit these for you shall i?

    Year 0 - no one even knows whats going on or even what/who/where they are.
    Somewhere in 15th century - Christians believe the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; Galileo says it's not.
    A bit later - Christians believe the earth is is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists believe the earth revolves in a circle
    A bit later - Christians believe the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists believe the earth revolves in an ellipse
    A bit later - Christians believe the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists believe the earth follows a straight path in the time space continuum. (what has this got to do with the earths placement in the universe? that statement doesnt mean the earth travels in a straight line through the universe. it is a generic statement that can be applied to anyone or thing in the entireity of the universe. you yourself travel through the space time continuum in a "straight" line. that doesnt mean your always walking forwards. )



    1. Isn't the first explanation the most likely to be true?
    not always.

    2. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
    yes. often the simplest explanation is the right one. so your idea of an all powerful being came from nothing to create something from nothing to make us? thats not that simple if you go into the complexities of it all. in fact the big bang theory is probably easier!

    3. Why do scientists keep changing their mind?
    because its a learning curve. you dont just wake up one morning and know everything!

    Son, all I can say is Follow Jesus, not the vagaries of science so-called.

    and i'll say please open your mind instead of hanging onto a single lifeline. i'm not saying stop believing. by all means continue to do that i have nothing against people who have faith.


    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by michael the hater View Post
    a blackhole can be a singularity but a singularity doesnt have to be a blackhole. and (before it was witnessed) scientists believed that nothing could escape a blackhole... until they saw a hyper-nova. this is when a star is in its final days and goes super nova. however because of the size of the star it collapses in on itself creating a blackhole. the blackhole then proceeds to "eat" what it can of the explosion but actually "eats" to much and you can see energy escaping the blackhole from either end of it. you got nothing.
    How likely is that? Who's going to believe that? Can your scientists prove any of it? It's like Startrek, it's all in the fevered imagination of atheists, stressed because their world is falling apart!

    and your gullible enough to believe a book that has no backing..... i understand the similarities between God creating the universe and the big bang but saying we're gullible for believeing a scientist.... why should i believe you? oh wait i know the answer to this... its in the bible and the bible is truth.... well from our perspective science holds truth....

    who to believe? i wonder....
    Year 0 - everyone knows the earth is the center of the universe
    Somewhere in 15th century - Christians know the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; Galileo (a scientist) says it's not.
    A bit later - Christians know the earth is is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists say the earth revolves in a circle
    A bit later - Christians know the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists say the earth revolves in an ellipse
    A bit later - Christians know the earth is stationary at the center of the universe; scientists say the earth follows a straight path in the time space continuum.

    1. Isn't the first explanation the most likely to be true?
    2. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
    3. Why do scientists keep changing their mind?

    Son, all I can say is Follow Jesus, not the vagaries of science so-called.

    1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
    1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.


    Leave a comment:


  • michael the hater
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by Brother Enoch View Post
    Hmmm, isn't a singularity a black hole? And wouldn't a black hole that had the entire universe in it be the biggest possible black hole? And don't scientists say nothing, not even light can escape a black hole? So how did the universe get out of that huge black hole smartypants? Hmm? Or are we still in it?

    Gotcha!
    a blackhole can be a singularity but a singularity doesnt have to be a blackhole. and (before it was witnessed) scientists believed that nothing could escape a blackhole... until they saw a hyper-nova. this is when a star is in its final days and goes super nova. however because of the size of the star it collapses in on itself creating a blackhole. the blackhole then proceeds to "eat" what it can of the explosion but actually "eats" to much and you can see energy escaping the blackhole from either end of it. you got nothing.

    Originally posted by WinnerNotSinner View Post
    You're so gullible you'll believe anything a lab assistant with a joke science degree wants you to believe. If the earth was created by a big bang, why does it not say this in the Bible?
    and your gullible enough to believe a book that has no backing..... i understand the similarities between God creating the universe and the big bang but saying we're gullible for believeing a scientist.... why should i believe you? oh wait i know the answer to this... its in the bible and the bible is truth.... well from our perspective science holds truth....

    who to believe? i wonder....

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by TheDrunkenScot View Post
    Dammit, you got me. Bend over, Billy. We'll make a man out of you yet.
    I knew it! You admit that you are a homosexual predator who has been lying in wait for me all this time! Well keep your nasty appendages to yourself, buster! I don't take kindly to fruitcakes trying to get a piece of my manly musculature! This is for my wife Ethel only! And her only when she behaves! You go crawl back under whatever unclean rock you came from, homer! Foul, man hunting homersexural!

    Burn in Hell, homer!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Enoch
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by TheDrunkenScot View Post
    No, my science implies that there must have been virtual particles at the birth of the Universe. It does not at any point claim that we are "all virtual particles. The ghost of a long dead universe dreaming itself".

    Learn to debate properly.
    It must be frustrating for you to realize that a True Christian(tm) understands your 'science' better than you yourself do.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDrunkenScot
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    Your malicious insults do not assuage me one bit. I've got you on the run now. You are changing the subject, trying to make personal attacks. You know in your heart that the only reason you say there is no God is that you want an excuse to continue your proud sinning. Admit it.

    Edit: I believe the sin you crave so much is anal sex. With other men. Just admit it.
    Dammit, you got me. Bend over, Billy. We'll make a man out of you yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

    Originally posted by TheDrunkenScot View Post
    You quoted a from an entire post that rebutted your point, and used that to counter it. You are without a doubt the worst debator I have ever had the misfortune to meet. For a group with such supposed conviction, you argue your position so poorly.
    Your malicious insults do not assuage me one bit. I've got you on the run now. You are changing the subject, trying to make personal attacks. You know in your heart that the only reason you say there is no God is that you want an excuse to continue your proud sinning. Admit it.

    Edit: I believe the sin you crave so much is anal sex. With other men. Just admit it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...