[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Those are the implications of your so-called science, learn to think.

No, my science implies that there must have been virtual particles at the birth of the Universe. It does not at any point claim that we are "all virtual particles. The ghost of a long dead universe dreaming itself".

Learn to debate properly.

[Brother Enoch]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Where did I say that, exactly? Oh wait, I didn't. You're lying, Brother Enoch, and that's a sin.

Those are the implications of your so-called science, learn to think.

[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Are we inviting it to join us now?

It thinks we're all virtual particles. The ghost of a long dead universe dreaming itself.

Where did I say that, exactly? Oh wait, I didn't. You're lying, Brother Enoch, and that's a sin.

Sore loser!

You quoted a from an entire post that rebutted your point, and used that to counter it. You are without a doubt the worst debator I have ever had the misfortune to meet. For a group with such supposed conviction, you argue your position so poorly.

[Brother Enoch]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Join us! You'll like it! You'll see!

Are we inviting it to join us now?

It thinks we're all virtual particles. The ghost of a long dead universe dreaming itself.

[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

You need to be jealous! Just take off that skirt, put a pipe in that mug, and ACCEPT JESUS!

Join us! You'll like it! You'll see!

It's a kilt.

A pipe in my mug? Then I just get tobacco in my evening cup of Earl Grey.

Why on Earth should I accept an Arabic man who claimed to be the Son of God, when he has such as you amongst his followers? I wouldn't wish to be associated with your group in any way other than as someone who opposes you in every way possible.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Sore loser!

[SUV]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

In other words, you can't. Off you go, back to sewing or being abused by your husband or forcing your viewpoint on your children or whatever it is you people do of an evening.

You need to be jealous! Just take off that skirt, put a pipe in that mug, and ACCEPT JESUS!

Join us! You'll like it! You'll see!

[BelieverInGod]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Has this idiot taken over every thread? Talk about Narcissism.

[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

That's for ME to Know® and YOU to find out

In other words, you can't. Off you go, back to sewing or being abused by your husband or forcing your viewpoint on your children or whatever it is you people do of an evening.

[SUV]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Care to prove the link between saying "Wow" and being on drugs? Preferably with scripture, since you refuse to allow any other method of proof when I use it...

That's for ME to Know(r) and YOU to find out

[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Oh.My.GOD.

Now he's not only drunk but also *smoking something*

Saying "Wow" means I'm doing drugs? That is the most utterly ass-backward logic I have ever heard.

Care to prove the link between saying "Wow" and being on drugs? Preferably with scripture, since you refuse to allow any other method of proof when I use it...

[SUV]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Wow

Oh.My.GOD.

Now he's not only drunk but also *smoking something*

[TheDrunkenScot]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Question for you, Drunken Scot:

How do atheists explain supernatural phenomena like miracles and prophecy in the Bible? And don't say "we don't believe in them". You can't keep using the same excuse over and over.

Wait, so I can't give the answer I honestly stand by? Wow, nice way to try and win the argument - just refuse to allow valid answers.

Okay then - to put it simply, miracles and "supernatural phenomena" are either rare, but explainable occurences, or they are occurences we cannot currently explain (the "God of the gaps" theory, wherein people only attribute to God what they cannot [yet] understand).
As for prophecy - the majority of prophecies in the Bible are awfully vague - in fact, the only "prophesier" I would consider statistically accurate enough to merit consideration would be Nostradamus, who predicted more things, more accurately, than most other fortune-tellers.

And as a rule, anything from the Bible is unable to be considered as "true" prophecy, as the original book was not even compiled until roughly 300AD, and your KJV was not compiled until 1611 (by the Church of England), so is an unreliable historical source.

[Brother Enoch]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Atomic fission =/= God saying "go boom now okay".



All black holes are singularities, not all singularities are black holes. The singularity point from whence the Big Bang began is a perfect example of this. Nice try though.

What is it then? It's my understanding that your physicists say objects beyond a certain mass collapse into black holes. All the matter in the universe in one body would certainly qualify as having sufficient mass to create a black hole. And according to that wheelchair guy, Richard Hawking or whatever (I read him on the crapper sometimes, keeps me regular), the only thing that escapes from black holes are positively charged virtual particles. So is the whole universe just virtual particles then? With all the negative particles from the original virtual particle pairs having entered the event horizon thus annihilating themselves along with the original super-super-massive black hole?

Yeah, I think I'll stick with Genesis.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: The Big Bang. The atheist Genesis.

Question for you, Drunken Scot:

How do atheists explain supernatural phenomena like miracles and prophecy in the Bible? And don't say "we don't believe in them". You can't keep using the same excuse over and over.