X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • James Peter
    Papist Stooge
    • Aug 2009
    • 401

    #16
    Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

    Yes they are! Jesus even says so in the Bible!

    Matthew 16:17 Jesus replied, 'Simon son of Jonah, you are a blessed man! Because it was no human agency that revealed this to you but my Father in heaven.
    18 So I now say to you: You are Peter and on this rock I will build my community. And the gates of the underworld can never overpower it.
    19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of Heaven: whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.'

    AHA! I bet you never knew that, did you? But I learned it in Youth Group, so I know it's true!
    in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti

    Comment

    • Nobar King
      Municipal Code Archivist - Deuteronomy 28:58
      Christ's Guardian
      True Christian™
      • Sep 2007
      • 23748

      #17
      Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

      How does that support your wild conclusions?
      May you be a blessing to every life you touch.

      Comment

      • James Peter
        Papist Stooge
        • Aug 2009
        • 401

        #18
        Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

        See, there Jesus said Peter is His rock on earth. And Peter founded the Catholic Church, so it is the only True Church! Hosana in the highest.
        in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti

        Comment

        • JennyD
          Honorary True Christian™
          Sweet Placid Sister
          Forum Member
          • Dec 2007
          • 9567

          #19
          Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

          Originally posted by James Peter View Post
          How can you disagree with what the Vatican says? They are God's voice on earth!
          How can the Vatican't contradict the Bible, then, and say that the Bible is wrong when it comes to Creation?
          Originally posted by James Peter View Post
          See, there Jesus said Peter is His rock on earth. And Peter founded the Catholic Church, so it is the only True Church! Hosana in the highest.
          Is Peter presently alive, or dead?

          Does the Bible indicate apostolic succession? Where?
          www.palibandaily.com - Your Christian News Source
          Huckabee/Palin Gingrich 2012 will reclaim America for Christ! PRAISE!

          Christian Ladies:
          Savor your separation in style at the Monthly Visitor!

          Comment

          • James Peter
            Papist Stooge
            • Aug 2009
            • 401

            #20
            Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

            "what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2:2)

            Titus 1: 5For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee:



            Acts 1: 15And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,)
            16Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.
            17For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry.
            18Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.
            19And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.
            20For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein: and his bishoprick let another take.
            21Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us,
            22Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
            23And they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.
            24And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
            25That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
            26And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.


            Psalm 109: 8Let his days be few; and let another take his office.
            in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti

            Comment

            • JennyD
              Honorary True Christian™
              Sweet Placid Sister
              Forum Member
              • Dec 2007
              • 9567

              #21
              Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

              I should have been more specific.

              Did Jesus direct apostolic suggestion?

              I can see that there is language that, if you twist the words until they shriek with the agony of the damned, can be interpreted to mean that a cabal of dress-wearing, boy-raping perverts should appoint themselves the Earthly representatives of the Most High.
              www.palibandaily.com - Your Christian News Source
              Huckabee/Palin Gingrich 2012 will reclaim America for Christ! PRAISE!

              Christian Ladies:
              Savor your separation in style at the Monthly Visitor!

              Comment

              • James Peter
                Papist Stooge
                • Aug 2009
                • 401

                #22
                Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

                I don't know whether Jesus directed apostolic suggestion, as I'm not sure what that even means. As for succession, well:

                Search the world's largest database of answers about the beliefs and practices of the Catholic faith. Learn more about Catholicism through articles, books, videos and more.


                OBJECTOR: Doesn’t the Catholic Church believe in the idea of apostolic succession? I find no evidence in the Bible for such an idea.

                CATHOLIC: Yes, the Catholic Church does believe that the New Testament teaches the concept of apostolic succession, and it is not the only church today that espouses such a doctrine. For example, the Orthodox churches believe in apostolic succession, as do some forms of Episcopalianism and Lutheranism. But tell me first what you understand by this term.

                OBJECTOR: Apostolic succession, as I understand it, is the idea that bishops today are successors or descendants of the apostles whom Jesus appointed to go into all the world and preach the gospel. It supposes that the original apostles ordained men as bishops, who in turn ordained others, and that this process continues today.

                CATHOLIC: You have the basic idea down correctly, although I would refrain from using the word descendants, because the bishops, who are successors of the apostles, are not physical descendants of the apostles. They are and were men chosen from among the members of the Church to lead the flock as shepherds. These bishops are the primary pastors of the Church.

                Priests (presbyters), who are ordained by the bishops, are their assistants in ministry. They have valid orders because they are connected to the original apostles through their bishops’ succession. In a secondary sense, they too have apostolic succession. This implies that the local Church is not the individual parish but the diocese of which the bishop is pastor.

                Why is this idea objectionable?

                OBJECTOR: The hierarchical structure that you outline is not in the Bible. Jesus gave us his teachings through the apostles. They handed on that teaching to the next generation, but they themselves died off toward the end of the first century. The only "apostolic succession" in the Bible is a handing on of the truth that Jesus taught. For example, Paul says, "I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you" (1 Cor. 11:23). And Jude speaks about "the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints" in Jude 3. These are the truths contained in the New Testament.

                CATHOLIC: We agree that the apostolic ministry handed on the teachings of Christ. Paul as a faithful servant taught the truth of Jesus Christ, but we Catholics contend that what was passed on was not teaching only. He and the other apostles passed on the office of shepherd for the Church. The function of a bishop is to teach Christ’s gospel and shepherd the Church of a local diocese. This was intended by Christ and faithfully transmitted by the original apostles.

                OBJECTOR: Unwarranted additions like this crop up from time to time in the Catholic Church, but they are not in Scripture.

                CATHOLIC: Let me see if I understand you. You believe that Jesus passed on his teachings to the apostles and then they passed them on to successive generations of Christians? If so, why couldn’t Jesus also have passed on duties or office to the apostles?

                OBJECTOR: He appointed the apostles as the foundation of the Church, as Paul says in Ephesians 2:20, but he did not mean for the office of apostle to continue after their deaths. There is simply no evidence in the New Testament to suggest that the office of the apostle was meant to be continued.

                CATHOLIC: Apostolic succession means that the authority of the apostles was passed on to the early bishops of the Church. You say this is not biblical? I presume that you mean that the early Church had no bishops that were considered successors of the apostles.

                OBJECTOR: That would be one consequence my position. There were pastors in the early Church, of course, but they were not bishops and definitely were not considered as authoritative as the apostles.

                CATHOLIC: I have evidence that that isn’t true. One witness to the structure of the early Church is St. Ignatius of Antioch, whose seven authentic letters are dated no later than A.D. 117 or 118, so he must have known some of the apostles themselves, as Antioch was a center of missionary activity frequented by Paul in Acts 11:26–30 and 13:1–3. Ignatius says, "It is fitting in every way . . . that you be knit together in a unified submission, subject to the bishop and presbytery that you may be completely sanctified" (Letter to Ephesians 2:2). Again he says of the Church, "Jesus Christ . . . is the will of the Father, just as the bishops, who are appointed in every land, are the will of Jesus Christ. So it is proper for you to be in harmony with the will of the bishop" (ibid., 3:2–4:1). He also wrote, "It is clear that one should see the bishop as the Lord himself" (ibid., 6:1). These quotes show first that Ignatius considered the bishops of the Church to be the "will of God" (i.e., their office was appointed by God) and second that obedience to the bishop was considered obedience to God himself. In some sense, the bishop represented God in the same way that the apostles did.

                OBJECTOR: But Ignatius may be expressing only his own view, not one widely shared among the early leaders of the Church. And further, Ignatius is not Scripture.

                CATHOLIC: The idea that Ignatius expressed only his own views is common among modern readers. Today, people tend to read these ancient views atomistically and individualistically. But that is not how ancient Church leaders functioned. They almost always sought to express the faith held in common rather than their own views. You see the importance of this continuity in St. Irenaeus of Lyons (second century): "We can enumerate those who were appointed by the apostles as bishops in the churches as their successors even to our time" (Against Heresies 3.1). And in the next section, Irenaeus begins to list the successors of Peter at Rome with these words: "But since it would be too long, in a work like this, to list the successions in all the churches, we shall take only one of them, the church that is greatest, most ancient, and known to all, founded and set up by the two most glorious apostles Peter and Paul at Rome while showing that the tradition and the faith it proclaims to men comes down through the successions of the bishops even to us" (ibid., 3.2).

                OBJECTOR: These early leaders, while venerable, are not the same as Scripture.

                CATHOLIC: But they are expressing a tradition that we see in Scripture. In Paul’s teaching, we hear him saying, "what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2:2). Paul envisions four generations of succession here: (1) Paul, (2) Timothy, (3) others taught by Timothy, and (4) others taught by Timothy’s hearers.

                OBJECTOR: But that verse just confirms my point. Paul is telling Timothy to teach what he heard, not to ordain others.

                CATHOLIC: You’re placing an either/or where there should be a both/and. Yes, Paul is telling Timothy to transmit the teaching he has given to him, but he also is saying that this teaching should be committed to faithful men. Both the teaching and the men are important. And it is clear from Titus 1:5 that Paul wanted Timothy and Titus to ordain other men as presbyters (priests) and bishops.

                OBJECTOR: But this does not mean that these men were going to have the same authority as Paul the apostle.

                CATHOLIC: In 2 Timothy 2:2, Paul teaches that there is continuity between himself and successive generations. This was envisioned by Jesus himself when he told his original apostles, "As the Father has sent me, even so I send you" (John 20:21). That same authority is expressed in Matthew 10:1: "He called to him his twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal every disease and every infirmity." These texts suggest that Jesus gave his authority to the apostles—the same authority that he had from the Father. What good would that authority be for the successive generations of the Church if it was not passed on, as 2 Timothy 2:2 seems to suggest?

                OBJECTOR: We agree that Jesus gave his authority to the apostles, but we disagree that it was passed on to others. Or, maybe I should say that the authority lies in the teaching, not in the office.

                CATHOLIC: I find that contradicts Acts 1:15–26. There we read about the election of Matthias as Judas’s successor. If you read this passage carefully, you will see that it shows that there was an apostolic college that had to be passed on through ordination. The whole point of the election is that there was a position (or office) vacated by Judas. In verse 16, Peter considers Judas’s betrayal as a fulfillment of Old Testament prediction. And he also quotes from the Greek Septuagint translation of Psalm 109:8 (Psalm 108:8 in the Septuagint numbering) to show that filling the office was foreseen in Scripture. Verse 20 reads, "His office let another take." The word translated "office" is episkope, which in New Testament language means "episcopal office" (see 1 Tim. 3:1).

                OBJECTOR: This is all very interesting, but all it shows is that Judas’s office had to be filled, not that the apostolic office was passed on after the original apostles died. If you look at Acts 1:21–22, you will see that the man to be chosen had to be an eyewitness to Jesus’ Resurrection. That can’t be said of "the successors of apostles."

                CATHOLIC: Obviously! That requirement could not last forever, but the passage shows that the office of overseer had to be filled. If we didn’t have other indicators in the New Testament about the office of bishop, your point would be valid. But when we put Acts 1:15–26 in conjunction with the instructions in 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus about ordaining men to the office of bishop (i.e., episkope), we must conclude that the office of bishop was intended to continue after the apostles’ deaths.
                in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti

                Comment

                • JennyD
                  Honorary True Christian™
                  Sweet Placid Sister
                  Forum Member
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 9567

                  #23
                  Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

                  Yes, I made a typo. Apologies.

                  From your Wall O' Text I discern that no, Jesus did NOT speak a word about apostolic succession.

                  This dialogue indicates that the Catholic cult rests apostolic succession upon the traditions of men, not the Word of God. The early church leaders are NOT Scriptural sources; they are revealing traditions of men.

                  Just like forbidding priests to marry, and praying to Mary, and selling "indulgences", Catholics prefer their traditions over God's Word.

                  Are you so blind as not to see this?
                  www.palibandaily.com - Your Christian News Source
                  Huckabee/Palin Gingrich 2012 will reclaim America for Christ! PRAISE!

                  Christian Ladies:
                  Savor your separation in style at the Monthly Visitor!

                  Comment

                  • James Peter
                    Papist Stooge
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 401

                    #24
                    Re: Creationism dismissed as 'paganism' by Vatican!

                    Well where in the Bible does it say the Bible is the only thing you have to follow?
                    in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti

                    Comment

                    Working...