[Brother Temperance]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Friend, do you seriously think "cake" is a chemical compound?

He probably thinks that it's a made-up drug.

[Nirvash]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosion ^

I also suggest that you take a look here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_explosion

And do check the dictionary too... It wouldn't hurt.

So.. well done there, you smart "scientist" you.
You're really showing how smart and educated you truly are here...

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

We know from the Bible (KJV1611) that sinners like you are going to burn for eternity in the lake of fire. Now whether there is a lot of hydrogen and oxygen around for this to happen, or whether it is just a giant steam explosion does not make a great deal of difference - the end result is the same. Once again "science" has proven itself to be an immense time waster (and a waste of the Lord's bandwidth).

Praise Jesus, the Bible (KJV1611) is proven right once again.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Here was my point: x



Here is where you are: x

Next time wear stilts so that the point doesn't go over your head.

Right..
Your knowledge and your so-called "points" are on par with Nirvash's..

You said:

Chemical changes can make something incredibly volatile become incredibly docile. However, since chemical change doesn't exist according to you, the beef I consume should make me sick from the E. Coli, and I should be eating raw eggs and sugar instead of a baked cake. Yet sadly, I'm not, because chemical change saved my life.

So obviously, you actually thought cake was a chemical compound.
As I said, you're on par with Nirvash.

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

An explosion doesn't need to involve fire, you total fool.
And in case you didn't know (can't be too sure with you): Fire doesn't equal an explosion either.

And stop acting like you didn't say what you actually said.
That you're an uneducated moron has been established before, but this time you can't dodge it. Everyone who isn't an uneducated mormon themselves can see it now, from reading the nonsense you actually thought! (And maybe STILL think?)
You said an explosion was:

exploding is when a chemical reaction takes compound(s) and turns it into another.

And that is still complete BS.
Friend, if you're going to claim "science = truth" then I suggest that you actually learn it first..

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Yes if changes into gas when heated rapidly that can cause a explosion but it does not burn. This only happens at hight temps.

Enough of this nonsense. Our very own researchers at the Landover Baptist Institute for Creation Research have absolutely established the origins of mankind:



The full story can be found here.

You really ought to read this web site more carefully. Then you would know The Truth. And there can be only one Truth - that found in the King James Bible. All the rest are lies. Do not be swayed by so-called evolution books and web sites - they are authored by Satan.

praying for your soul,
Buford

[ayerea]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

You forgot one very important thing. Every single atom is recyclable. That means the atoms in the first bacteria have been in millions of different organisms. The same atoms keep getting re-used over and over and over and over. Plus there is always more stuff coming into earth by way of meteors and such. So, its impossible to make that kind of calculation, because its impossible to tell how many atoms exist on this earth, and how many times each one has been used to make something, weather it be a tree or dirt, or a diamond. Your argument is invalid. (see girls know a few things too)

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

You forgot one very important thing. Every single atom is recyclable. That means the atoms in the first bacteria have been in millions of different organisms. The same atoms keep getting re-used over and over and over and over. Plus there is always more stuff coming into earth by way of meteors and such. So, its impossible to make that kind of calculation, because its impossible to tell how many atoms exist on this earth, and how many times each one has been used to make something, weather it be a tree or dirt, or a diamond. Your argument is invalid. (see girls know a few things too)

That sounds suspiciously like "reincarnation" to me, a Buddhist-Muslim superstition.

God does not do reincarnation. He creates matter and all living things out of the ether with just a snap of his holy fingers. That's the way He created the Earth 6000 years ago.

And God deletes matter as He chooses. That Joo-bastard Einstein who claimed that matter can be converted into energy by smashing atoms was lying, but then what do you expect from a scientologist.

And all that scientologist nonsense about "global warming" - just more drivel from communists like Al Gore. God controls the Earth's thermostat - he warms or cools as He deems necessary.

Either you're for God, or you're with the terrorists. There is no in between.

YIC,
Buford

[ayerea]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Actually its a proven and observable theory, Matter cannot be created or deleted, there is a set amount and thats it, the matter just changes state and changes into different atoms by different combinations of the 2 principle parts, proton and electron. And yes, you can get energy from breaking apart the atoms in a super dense radioactive material, its kinda how a nuclear bomb works... and if people here think math is right, try E=MC^2. Thats how it all works.
Oh and you sound like a sith lord.

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Oh and you sound like a sith lord.

Aha, you reveal yourself as a Star Wars fan. You should stop watching that science fiction trash, and watch good, wholesome patriotic shows like 24.



Remember, if you go with "science" rather than Jesus, you risk not only eternal damanation, but waterboarding by agent Jack Bauer himself.

You're either with Christ, or with the terrorists. You know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road...they get run over.

YIC,
Buford

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Actually its a proven and observable theory, Matter cannot be created or deleted, there is a set amount and thats it, the matter just changes state and changes into different atoms by different combinations of the 2 principle parts, proton and electron. And yes, you can get energy from breaking apart the atoms in a super dense radioactive material, its kinda how a nuclear bomb works... and if people here think math is right, try E=MC^2. Thats how it all works.
Oh and you sound like a sith lord.

I see that our sickular school system has produced another generation of imbeciles. Your so-called "proven and observable theory" is not so sacrosanct as an immutable law of nature. These man-made "theories" are often violated, particularly in special relativity and paired particles, and the first and second "law" of thermodynamics only is valid in closed systems. No one has yet determined whether the universe is a closed system.

Take off your iPod, pay attention, get cracking with the books, and read the Bible (KJV1611) while you are at it.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

I see that our sickular school system has produced another generation of imbeciles. Your so-called "proven and observable theory" is not so sacrosanct as an immutable law of nature. These man-made "theories" are often violated, particularly in special relativity and paired particles, and the first and second "law" of thermodynamics only is valid in closed systems. No one has yet determined whether the universe is a closed system.

Take off your iPod, pay attention, get cracking with the books, and read the Bible (KJV1611) while you are at it.

And don't you have to love how that theory, and the theory of the big bang so grossly contradicts each other?

One says: No matter or energy may be created, only changed.
The other says: First there was nothing, then something came from nothing, and prooceeds to explode!


Stupid scientists can't make up their minds on what lie to push..

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

And don't you have to love how that theory, and the theory of the big bang so grossly contradicts each other?

One says: No matter or energy may be created, only changed.
The other says: First there was nothing, then something came from nothing, and prooceeds to explode!


Stupid scientists can't make up their minds on what lie to push..

The so-called "scientists" come up with these wacko theories like evolution, global warming, big bang (sounds obscene!), and "sexual reproduction" (why do they hate the stork?).

I've been trying to understand their motive for inventing these pagan lies, when they should be reading the Bible (which has the answers to all of life's questions). Then yesterday, shortly after I took my thorazine, it finally occurred to me why the scientists are such an evil cult.

It's the same motive for al Qaeda to crash airplanes into our Godly Pentagon and World Trade Center.

THEY HATE OUR FREEDOM!

I realize this will come as a Revelation to many of you.

I need to get in touch with Rush Limbaugh and reveal this important information, so that he can broadcast it on his show. The nation must be warned!

YIC,
Buford

[Rorschach]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

I've seen many articles questioning the legitimacy of Carbon-14 dating. It's true, there are a lot of flaws in it to be answered.

To answer an earlier question, scientists believe they can date the earth to 3.5 billion years through a process called uranium-lead dating. According to them, certain elements in and on the earth contain trace amounts of uranium. Through the same process as Carbon-14, they "date" these samples. Uranium dating is supposedly accurate anywhere from 1 million years to over 4.5 billion.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

To answer an earlier question, scientists believe they can date the earth to 3.5 billion years through a process called uranium-lead dating. According to them, certain elements in and on the earth contain trace amounts of uranium. Through the same process as Carbon-14, they "date" these samples. Uranium dating is supposedly accurate anywhere from 1 million years to over 4.5 billion.

How could they know that?
Do they have samples they KNOW to be 1 million years to 4.5billion years already?
(So they could test them with this method and get the same results..)

Of course they don't have such. They couldn't have.
(Especially since the earth is only 6,000years old.)
This is yet more nonsense created to fool feeble-minded atheist idiots.
But you're not a feeble-minded atheist idiot, now are you?

[Rorschach]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

How could they know that?
Do they have samples they KNOW to be 1 million years to 4.5billion years already?
(So they could test them with this method and get the same results..)

Of course they don't have such. They couldn't have.
(Especially since the earth is only 6,000years old.)
This is yet more nonsense created to fool feeble-minded atheist idiots.
But you're not a feeble-minded atheist idiot, now are you?

I'm almost hurt you question my faith in the Lord. Atheists try too hard to corrupt our society and destroy our religion. They want to turn us into a generation of gay parents, aborted babies, and godless schools.