Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Given what the Bible (KJV1611) says, there is not one good reason for us to be frolicking around worrying about such matters as where the universe came from or why we are here. It's no wonder that the consumption of Ritalin, Lexapro, Xanax, Zoloft, Effexor, Wellbutrin, Prozac, Paxil, Celexa, Remeron and Zyban are at such an all time high.
X
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
All that we can take from the work of the likes of Hawking is what a good job Our Lord Noodle did, how could it have been otherwise?
Five Thousand Years Ago:
The Beginning
THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER created the universe and a bunch of planets, including Earth. No one except Himself was around to see it, but we suspect it was rather dull. The initial creation, obviously, must have been spectacular, but He then spent the next ten to one hundred years painstakingly preparing the universe to appear older then it actually is. Photons were placed individually, en route to earth, ostensibly emitted millions of years ago from stars across the galaxy. In reality, we know that each proton was divinely placed and red-shifted (The universe appears to be expanding, much like cooked pasta, as illustrated by observed light from distant galaxies shifting toward the Marinara Spectrum. Some scientists cite this as support for His preference for red sauce, but they are most likely idiots) appropriately to make the universe appear to be billions of years old. We are still finding His camouflage methods at work today; each time scientists discover apparent evidence of billions-of-years-old universe, we can be assured that this is just more elaborate preparation He put in place.
Earth was created in approximately 0.062831853 seconds and was similarly disguised to appear much older. We can be certain that the FSM spent even more time preparing the earth, because, being all-knowing, He was well aware that soon enough there would be nosy people poking around everywhere. Know as “scientists,” these nosy people have a sick need – probably sexually motivated (As evidence of sexual motivation on the part of scientists, let’s choose an occupation at random, say genecology. These so-called professionals spend their entire lives looking at female sex organs – or poontang, as it’s known in academic circles. Look a little deeper into the fold, and you will find that nearly 99 percent of all gynaecologists have a scientific background. To illustrate just how significant that is, pick another group at random – say myself. I’m not a scientist, and I hardly ever see female sex organs. I find it hard to believe this is just a coincidence. I’m not saying all scientists are perverts, but I think it’s safe to say the nearly all of them are) – to figure out how things work, and so it was even more important that our apparent reality be well designed to hide the truth.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Earlier this week an excerpt from Stephen Hawking's new book The Grand Design was published in The Times of London. Hawking's book, a smorgasbord of typical atheistic talking points and straw man arguments meant to make Christians look like a bunch of nit-wits, argues that the universe could have conceivably come from nothing; an assertion that stands in stark contrast to the beliefs of the Christian church.
Christians have long held the belief that in order for anything to exist there must have been a creator. The computer chair that I am currently sitting in did not materialize out of nothing: someone made all of the individual parts and assembled it, allowing me to sit on it right now. Using that logic we can ascertain that the Earth and the galaxy in which we reside did not spontaneously come into existence; someone had to have intelligently designed it.
For many years atheists have attempted (unsuccessfully) to debate that the Earth did not come from a creator, but when asked where, they mumble inaudibly and then attempt to move on to the next answer. Usually saying something like "I can't tell you where we came from, and neither can you, because no one was there to see it." Yet if we as have learned nothing else, it is that the galaxy, the Earth, humanity and our ecosystem are all incredibly simplistic entities. Scientists would have you to believe that the human body or the Amazon Rain Forest are all infinitely complex organisms, so in-tune with their surroundings and ingrained with the earth that it is simply ridiculous to accept that they were created by one being, but were instead the product of millions of years of evolution. What atheists and evolutionists forget is that God is capable of anything a human mind can conceive.
Atheists and evolutionists will have you believe that the Earth is billions of years old. They will point to fossils and rock formations that can all be dated back millions of years ago. They will take you to the Grand Canyon and explain that there was no way it could exist if the Earth were only six thousand years old. The believer, filled with the capability to conceive of anything God could theoretically could do, would point out that since God is infinitely powerful, he theoretically could have formed it six thousand years ago, but made it look like it was formed billions of years ago.
For you see, readers, God is greater than anything that can be conceived. The human mind is not limitless, but God is. God is greater than the greatest thing you can think of, otherwise he wouldn't be God. What is greater? The gradual erosion caused by a river over the course of millions of years to form a chasm thousands of feet deep, or God making a chasm that is thousands of feet deep that looks like it was made gradually over millions of years, but really only took a few days?
Even if Hawking is correct and the world and the universe did spontaneously come into existence that still doesn't disprove God. God, being greater than nothing coming into existence as the result of nothing, clearly would have greenlit and supervised the nothingness coming into somethingness as a result of nothingness.
Ultimately, though, my problem with Hawking comes from his callousness. Who does he think he is? What authority does he have to speak on an issue like this? As a physicist, Hawking is as qualified to talk about theological issues as I, a political pundit, am to perform amateur surgery. But just as I only perform minor operations on people during social get-togethers, Hawking should leave the religion-talk for the wine and cheese parties."Spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper [fuse] and set the universe going."
As an atheist, as someone who doesn't believe in God, Hawking has no place running his mouth on a subject like this. The creation of our Earth is inherently and wholly a religious and theoretically subject, not a scientific one. Only religious people who have dedicated their entire lives to objectively studying the Bible, earning post-graduate degrees in religious studies from Christian Universities are really qualified to speak on the subject of Earth's creation, and thus far not a single one of the leading Christian researchers in the world have come to the same conclusion as Hawkings. These are people that have far more religious training, who went to Biblical colleges to unbiasedly study religion with an open mind, and determined that the Bible and the word of God is the only true path.
Doctors speak on subjects of medicine, lawyers speak on subjects of the law, economists speak on subjects of the economy while used car salesmen from Arkansas, stay at home mothers of 9 from Kansas and right wing radio pundits from Iowa who at one time in the early 80s made a living writing robot lesbian erotica are qualified to speak on subjects of Religion. Frankly, who cares what Hawking has to say about religion anyway? You wouldn't go to a lawyer if you needed a tooth pulled, you wouldn't see a car mechanic if you needed legal council, why would you go to a physicist for answers to religious questions?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
If Hawking is so smart why is he still in a wheel chair and why does he talk like Darth Vader?

The Hell Train is wheel chair accessable.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Well, if you listen to these physicists they will tell you that we are all made of "atoms", but then these atoms are composed of sub-atomic "particles" that no one has ever seen. Then comes all the "quantum" stuff where these particles really might be "waves", but not always and sometimes they are both - and they can be in two places at the same time, but under the right conditions they don't even "exist" at all. Then somewhere there was an unprovoked "Big Bang" that consisted of a "quark" soup and when the soup cooled down we all sat down and ate it due to evolution. That in a nutshell summarizes the "Laws of Physics".
God has a special plan for Steven Hawking. He is going to be sucked into a giant black hole and emerge out the other side into an alternate universe where he will be sodomized by Satan's tallywhacker for an eternity where protons and fignewtons do not decay and the universe is steady state.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Shouting gibberish doesn't make it intelligible, dear. Coming from you, imagine how much it doesn't matter to us.Originally posted by AreYouRetarded View PostAND HERE I WAS THINKING I WAS READING POSTS WRITTEN BY CHILDREN, BUT NOW IT'S CLEAR THAT YOU GUYS ARE ALL SEVERELY RETARDED.
MY APOLOGIES; I HAD NO IDEA YOU GUYS ALL HAD MENTAL DISORDERS.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
AND HERE I WAS THINKING I WAS READING POSTS WRITTEN BY CHILDREN, BUT NOW IT'S CLEAR THAT YOU GUYS ARE ALL SEVERELY RETARDED.
MY APOLOGIES; I HAD NO IDEA YOU GUYS ALL HAD MENTAL DISORDERS.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Where's your (spinoza's)God now, Hawking?!
2 Kings 15:5
"And the LORD smote the king, so that he was a leper unto the day of his death, and dwelt in a several house. And Jotham the king's son was over the house, judging the people of the land."
So smitten, is he, as Uzziah was - and still blind to the err of his ways. For someone who's so "smart" he sure is slow to take a hint.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
At least Our Lord pre-punished him here on earth, knowing this day would come.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
I imagine he'll be in a foot-deep puddle of fire with vertical edges, unable to roll his way out and eternally bumping against the edge, freedom from torture within his grasp . . . if only he could grab things.Originally posted by John Creeser View PostThey do have wheel chair access in hell?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
They do have wheel chair access in hell?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
Personally I think he's nothing more than a puppet that the atheist elite can make say whatever they want. Are we even sure that he's alive? Has any True Christian(TM) ever checked him for a pulse?
Instead we are presented with "the smartest man in the world" who can't say or do anything. He can't even write his own name, yet we're supposed to believe what comes out of some sort of voice synthesizer, just because "the smartest man in the world" is "saying" it?
By the way, how does someone who can't type or hold a pencil "write" a book?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripp
"God did not create the universe and the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics, the eminent British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking argues in a new book."
That statement begs the question, who made the laws of physics?" The answer of course is God.
This is from Romans chapter 1.
19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Mr. Hawking might want to review that bit of scripture.
Leave a comment:
-
Steven Hawking, a drooling idiot, proves that God hates cripples!
Dear Friends,
All Christians know that God hates cripples. God makes people cripple to punish them for their sins. The smart ones repent and will be cured by God. The stupid ones will stay cripple. And the really really retarded ones end up like Steven Hawking. No matter how much proof is provided for God's might, he keeps saying very stupid things. "Who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?" (Exodus 4:11)
God did not create the universe, says Hawking
This drooling idiot from Gkzkyazkokyz, does not just fail to grasp The LORD's Bible. He also has no clue as to how science actually works. Instead of gathering facts to prove his thesis, he just blurts things out without even a single shred of proof. Nowhere in his awful book does he ever provide any proof in any form, size or shape that God did not create the universe. We can only hope that one of these days someone disconnects his speech device so we will no longer have to listen to his insane rambling. I suppose we can find some comfort in knowing that he will burn in hell. "Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." (Matthew 5:22)LONDON - God did not create the universe and the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics, the eminent British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking argues in a new book.
Yours in Christ,
Pastor J.C. Manning, M.D., Ph.D.Tags: None
Leave a comment: