Creation is not science

[Yhalothar]

For something to be a science or even a theory is must be falsifiable. You cannot disprove "God did it" therfore creation is not science.

[Deaner]

Re: Creation is not science

For something to be a science or even a theory is must be falsifiable. You cannot disprove "God did it" therfore creation is not science.

Not being able to "disprove" God did it is what makes God so great. Jesus wins everytime. Why the hell would I want to follow science which tells me at some point in time, although they don't know exactly when, I fell out of a monkey's cooter?

[Yhalothar]

Re: Creation is not science

Not being able to "disprove" God did it is what makes God so great. Jesus wins everytime. Why the hell would I want to follow science which tells me at some point in time, although they don't know exactly when, I fell out of a monkey's cooter?

No actually Jesus loses for having no proof. Do you believe apollo is dragging the sun through space on his chariot? The burden of proof is on you. So you're upset because at some point in time this species was less complex? Well fine, be upset. That still doesn't make it science.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Creation is not science

For something to be a science or even a theory is must be falsifiable. You cannot disprove "God did it" therfore creation is not science.

So what you're basically saying is:
The theory of evolution is science, and it's science because it can be proven false..
But if all science is falsifiable - then all science is false. It follows logically.
As otherwise, it would be impossible to falsify it.
You can't prove the truth to be false since it's true:
There can never be evidence to the contrary, for then it wouldn't BE true.
Thus, evolution is false.

Praise Jesus and may foolish scientists like you get your just reward in HELL!

[Yhalothar]

Re: Creation is not science

But if all science is falsifiable - then all science is false. It follows logically.

No if all of science is falsifiable than all of science is falsifiable. However the fact your using scientific laws facts and theories to use your computer shows that there must be something to this crazy science thing. Evolution hasn't been falsified however we can't live for millions of years and watch it taking place which is why macro evolution is still a theory. Evolution also has numerous applications which work every day. Creation has none.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Creation is not science

No if all of science is falsifiable than all of science is falsifiable.

So what are you trying to say now.. That you can falsify truth?
You illogical science supporters never fail to crack me up, you all like to think you're so sensible..
But really: You got your heads screwed on backwards or something.

However the fact your using scientific laws facts and theories to use your computer shows that there must be something to this crazy science thing.

It only proves that computers is possible when built in certain ways.
It doesn't prove that your theories as to WHY that works is correct.

Evolution hasn't been falsified

Then how do you know if it can be falsified or not?

however we can't live for millions of years and watch it taking place which is why macro evolution is still a theory.

Indeed it is. And a very stupid theory on top of that.

Evolution also has numerous applications which work every day. Creation has none.

MACRO-evolution has any applications? Such as?
What you're talking about is micro-evolution and nobody here denies the existance of that.

[Yhalothar]

Re: Creation is not science

"Then how do you know if it can be falsified or not? "

Show me a dragonfly with a plant cell wall. There. Falsified.

"MACRO-evolution has any applications? Such as?"

This guy gives a few http://youtube.com/watch?v=tnb_pmRDpqU and also destroys creation in the process

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Creation is not science

Show me a dragonfly with a plant cell wall. There. Falsified.

No.
Unless the theory actually claims that there are dragonflys who has plant cell walls.. you haven't falsified the theory.
You've only falsified a bizarre statement that you yourself made.
But according to yourself, that weird statement is now science since it was falsified:
And that tells us all something about how STUPID science truly is.

This guy gives a few http://youtube.com/watch?v=tnb_pmRDpqU and also destroys creation in the process

I don't have the time to watch the entire video based on a promise from someone as illogical as you.
But seeing as you so obviously have watched it.. Right?
Why don't you save us both some time and just tell me of one yourself?
Or can't you?

[Yhalothar]

Re: Creation is not science

"Unless the theory actually claims that there are dragonflys who has plant cell walls.. you haven't falsified the theory.
You've only falsified a bizarre statement that you yourself made."

No you dont understand. If there was a dragonfly with a cell wall evolution would be falsified.

"And that tells us all something about how STUPID science truly is."

Stop complaining about science, you wouldn't exist without it. Unlike religion it has tangible benefits.

"I don't have the time to watch the entire video based on a promise from someone as illogical as you."

I'm illogical? Explain all powerful please. You don't have 9 minutes? You must be a busy man.

I'm still waiting for some evidence that creation is science

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Creation is not science

The greatest arguments against evolution come from science. Did you know that no transitional forms have ever beyond found beyond the intraspecific? Or that lying evolutionists have come up with a ridiculous theory called saltation to explain this -- one that contradicts not only common sense but also evolutionary doctrine itself? Or that some of the leading evolutionary thinkers have renounced their position in favor of Biblical Creation?

Face it, your little theory has more holes in it than Benazir Bhutto's tits.

[Yhalothar]

Re: Creation is not science

Saltation is merely evolution happening very rapidly, then halting, then happening very rapidly. Anyway i'm not here to prove evolution, I don't need to. Your "creation" cannot be called science, or theory. There is absolutely nothing to back it up.

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Creation is not science

No you dont understand. If there was a dragonfly with a cell wall evolution would be falsified.

I understand perfectly.. It's you who seem to be confused as to what falsifying a theory would mean..
You're basically claiming that if I falsify a claim that isn't present in, say the theory of gravity, I can claim to have falsified the theory of gravity!
Needless to say, that is absurd. The claim must be present in the theory for the theory to be falisifed when the claim is!
That should be obvious for a small child..

And there is nothing in the theory of evolution stating that dragon flies have plant cell walls -
Thus, it can't be falsified by the fact that dragonflies don't have any plant cell walls..

BTW You just claimed they didn't have any cell-walls whatsoever!
You don't even know what you're typing it seems..

So in fact:
You didn't falsify the theory. But only your stupid statement.

Stop complaining about science, you wouldn't exist without it. Unlike religion it has tangible benefits.

I wouldn't exist without science?
And here I thought humans had been reproducing long before science ever existed.. I guess I was wrong all along!

I'm illogical? Explain all powerful please.

You're free to read my previous posts again.
I've shown you to be illogical plenty of times..
And in this post too.

You don't have 9 minutes? You must be a busy man.

I am. And you keep wasting my time with nonsense.
Stop dodging the subject and name an application please.

I'm still waiting for some evidence that creation is science

Creationism isn't what you regard as "science", and good thing that:
Because as we've proved in this thread - What you call "science" is false and illogical.
And so are the ones who practice it.. atleast if they're anything like you.

[Dr. Zaius]

Re: Creation is not science

Someday you'll be albe to see the meaning of TRUE science, and then you will be able to understand the difference between creation and evilution.

[Duvenoy]

Re: Creation is not science

The Theory or Evolution can be easily falsified with the fossil record. All of the strata bearing fossils is neatly arrainged in layers identified by geological periods. All that is necessary is to find is a fossil of, say, a species common in, say, the Cretacious in, say, Cambrian strata. The Cambrian Croc, for example.

As all species were miraculously created at the same moment, and 'macroevolution' is a massive load of horse evidence, it is only a matter of time before that fossil is discovered.

I continue my search for the Devonian Bunny, a creature reputed to still exist, probably in Texas.

doov