[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Actually, the pull it out of amber. It'd be weird to pull amber out of one's behind. I'm not sure it's physically possible.

Spare us the details of the latest homer perversion.

Here's a good one: Some egghead monkey worshiping jew professor is claiming he found a bee that's older than the earth!

It gets even sillier, Pastor. According to this:

unsaved liberal MSM "news" source

scientists have found a lamprey fossil from 360 million years ago, or about 60,000 times as old as the universe. What's more, they say it shows that lampreys have hardly evolved in all that time. So which is it, monkey-worshipers: do life forms evolve, or not?

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: Secular Science Lies

I believe that SATAN has sent Mikey, in the form of a demon, back to earth to prowl the Interweb and pander for the AntiChrist.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Something smells fishy.....

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Actually, the pull it out of amber. It'd be weird to pull amber out of one's behind. I'm not sure it's physically possible.

I don't want to know what you've pulled out of your behind, homer.
Sweet Lord Jesus pukes at your homerism.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Actually, the pull it out of amber. It'd be weird to pull amber out of one's behind. I'm not sure it's physically possible.

Try some flapjacks with pine sap syrup. Your gay caballero pals will have to conga-line to the hospital.

[Petal]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Actually, the pull it out of amber. It'd be weird to pull amber out of one's behind. I'm not sure it's physically possible.

why are you doubtin them possibililitys? you pull every one of your posts outta your butts!

[Poor little Kev]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Actually, the pull it out of amber. It'd be weird to pull amber out of one's behind. I'm not sure it's physically possible.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Secular Science Lies

Here's a good one: Some egghead monkey worshiping jew professor is claiming he found a bee that's older than the earth!

Scientist finds 100 million-year-old bee

PORTLAND, Ore. - A scientist has found a 100 million-year-old bee trapped in amber, making it possibly the oldest bee ever found. "I knew right away what it was, because I had seen bees in younger amber before," said George Poinar, a zoology professor at Oregon State University.

The bee is about 40 million years older than previously found bees. The discovery of the ancient bee may help explain the rapid expansion and diversity of flowering plants during that time.

Poinar found the bee in amber from a mine in the Hukawng Valley of northern Myanmar, formerly known as Burma. Many researchers buy bags of amber from miners to search for fossils. Amber, a translucent semiprecious stone, is a substance that begins as tree resin. The sticky resin entombs and preserves insects, pollen and other small organisms.

Also embedded in the amber are four kinds of flowers. "So we can imagine this little bee flitting around these tiny flowers millions of years ago," Poinar said.

An article on his discovery will appear Friday in the journal Science, co-authored by bee researcher Bryan Danforth of Cornell University.

The pollen-eating bee has a few features of meat-eating wasps, such as narrow hind legs, but the body's branched hairs are a key feature of pollen-spreading bees.

The bee — about one-fifth the size of today's worker honeybee — has a heart-shaped head.

But the ancient bee was probably an evolutionary dead end and may not have given rise to modern bees, scientists said.

"It's exciting to see something that seems so different from what we think of as modern bees," Danforth said. "It's not an ancestor of honeybees, but probably was a species on an early branch of the evolutionary tree of bees that went extinct."

These guys just pull this stuff out of their behinds, don't they.

[Petal]

Re: Secular Science Lies

I'm not entirely sure about those, but I know for a fact that a type of invisibily cloak is available. It takes a picture of whatever is on the other side, and then shows it on the cloak. It's not exactly high-tech, but it gets the job done.

that pure loon. what if i were wearin that cloak an Miss.Lilith were standin on the other sides? we both be kidnappeds by drunken sailors, that what!

i not want to sails them vodka seas, Mr.Truth.

[Poor little Kev]

Re: Secular Science Lies

I'm not entirely sure about those, but I know for a fact that a type of invisibily cloak is available. It takes a picture of whatever is on the other side, and then shows it on the cloak. It's not exactly high-tech, but it gets the job done.

[Hushed_Agony]

Re: Secular Science Lies

It's perfectly obvious what the secularist trash are getting up to here. By messing around with futuristic inventions, they hope to create a time machine, which will enable their allies in the Catholic Church to travel back in time and molest themselves as children, in order to recruit themselves into homerism. Just look at poor Mark Foley for proof.

Brother T,
I have found my one and only time machine that I will ever need....because anytime is time for Jesus!

YIC Hushed

[Enobarbus]

Re: Secular Science Lies

ScIeNtist are mostly homosexual demons so they don't have enough children for God to kill.

I'm sure that most secular scientists are probably homers and they are all under the thrall of the dark lord, of that there can be no doubt.

[tommy]

Re: Secular Science Lies

*sigh* Yet another way that these "scientists" are trying to overtake God. It reminds me of the magicians in pharoah's court trying to copy God's miracles of the 10 plagues. The very fact that God hasn't smoten every scientist's oldest male child is a mystery to me and more proof of God's undying patience. Glory!

ScIeNtist are mostly homosexual demons so they don't have enough children for God to kill.

[Marshall]

Re: science gets stupider and stupider

I think I'd notice if I was faster than light.

And how does looking up equal looking back in time? That's stupid.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: science gets stupider and stupider

HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA not funny.

You're right, there is nothing funny about scientists and intellectuals trying to bamboozle people into losing their faith in God and the decent Christian morality which is all that stops Hillary Clinton from establishing the new Khmer Rouge.

EDIT: When I refer to "decent Christian morality", I mean that there are enough voters out there motivated by Godly principles to stop Clinton ever taking power. Upon re-reading that sentence, it could appear as though I was trying to claim a link between Hellary and some form of morality, which was not my intention at all, I assure you.