The Bald Hypocrisy of So-Called Secular Scientists

[Born Again Bob]

Dear Friends,

How many times in your ministry to the snivelling Hell-bound have you heard them whinge: "I don't believe the eternal verities contained in the Bible (for example, about creation and the origin of the species) because SCIENCE has disproven them"? Why, if I've heard it from one jizz-splattered atheist, I've heard it from a thousand.

What grills my grits is that they refuse to think through the basis of their beliefs. Let's say, for example, that a particular numbskull has bought into lie, spread by ratfaced Jewish child molesting physicists, that the world started in a Big Bang. (Which, per Jewish wives, is the LAST Big Bang the universe has seen.) Well, how does this particular person KNOW that the Big Bang happened? They didn't witness it. They didn't gather the data or do the calculations that show it to be true. They READ IT IN A BOOK and THEY KNOW THAT OTHER PEOPLE BELIEVE IT. Well, guess what? The Bible is a book, and a damn sight more people believe in the Holy Gospel that in the droolings of Albert Feinstein and co -- and for a damn sight longer.

So what EXACTLY is the basis for preferring secular science to the Holy Gospel? Nothing but -- BLIND FAITH!

You know, sometimes I think that the best part about being saved is looking forward to God LAUGHING HIS ASS OFF at the stupid excuses people give for not accepting Christ -- just before God kick-punts them into the eternal lake of fire!

GOD WILL NOT BE MOCKED!

Yours in Him,
BAB

[Sacha-DG]

Re: The Bald Hypocrisy of So-Called Secular Scientists

Dear Friends,

How many times in your ministry to the snivelling Hell-bound have you heard them whinge: "I don't believe the eternal verities contained in the Bible (for example, about creation and the origin of the species) because SCIENCE has disproven them"? Why, if I've heard it from one jizz-splattered atheist, I've heard it from a thousand.

What grills my grits is that they refuse to think through the basis of their beliefs. Let's say, for example, that a particular numbskull has bought into lie, spread by ratfaced Jewish child molesting physicists, that the world started in a Big Bang.

I am an athiest and I believe that 'universe' means 'everything that exists'. Therefore, I must conclude that the universe has always existed.
I do not believe that that the world started with any kind of bang. I believe that the evidence of the big bang, such as the red shift, shows that the universe changed in its structure at some point due to a large explosion or 'big bang'.

(Which, per Jewish wives, is the LAST Big Bang the universe has seen.) Well, how does this particular person KNOW that the Big Bang happened? They didn't witness it. They didn't gather the data or do the calculations that show it to be true. They READ IT IN A BOOK and THEY KNOW THAT OTHER PEOPLE BELIEVE IT.

You can observe the red shift yourself, and like it or not, if you look at the physics behind it, it does indeed support the big Bang theory.

Well, guess what? The Bible is a book, and a damn sight more people believe in the Holy Gospel that in the droolings of Albert Feinstein and co -- and for a damn sight longer.

Before Christ, Christianity and the Bible did not even exist, how many people believed it then? None. Belief in Christianity began as a minority, but was it wrong then?

So what EXACTLY is the basis for preferring secular science to the Holy Gospel? Nothing but -- BLIND FAITH!

Empirical evidence? I think so.
You criticise athiests for 'blind faith', yet you practice it yourself. I hope you know the Bible says that hypocrites are damned.

You know, sometimes I think that the best part about being saved is looking forward to God LAUGHING HIS ASS OFF at the stupid excuses people give for not accepting Christ -- just before God kick-punts them into the eternal lake of fire!

That's the best part about being saved? Wow. That must suck.