Of course we all know that non-Americans possess SOME ability to communicate, but so do birds, pigs, and Californians. The point I am making is that they rely mostly on context and volume, not on Webster's, for understanding.
Consider the French, for example. The gurgling noise they make in the back of their throat can be made along a continuum of volume. Softer levels make positive indications, such as "this cheese is good", or "I am drunk". Medium levels express excitement, usually uttered when soliciting consent from a prospective sexual partner who is too large to rape. High levels indicate danger and serve as a warning. Other surrender monkeys who understand French know by this sound to take out their semen stained handkerchiefs and wave them, or any other white, flag-like implement present to hand.
It is really just a New Age idea that came about in the sixties that animals and foreigners are able to communicate through symbols. People who believe this are more likely to have sex with animals and foreigners as well.
Consider the French, for example. The gurgling noise they make in the back of their throat can be made along a continuum of volume. Softer levels make positive indications, such as "this cheese is good", or "I am drunk". Medium levels express excitement, usually uttered when soliciting consent from a prospective sexual partner who is too large to rape. High levels indicate danger and serve as a warning. Other surrender monkeys who understand French know by this sound to take out their semen stained handkerchiefs and wave them, or any other white, flag-like implement present to hand.
It is really just a New Age idea that came about in the sixties that animals and foreigners are able to communicate through symbols. People who believe this are more likely to have sex with animals and foreigners as well.
Deuteronomy 7:3-4
3Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
3Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
Comment